« Clinton now, Clinton then | Main | Daschle Democrats attack First Amendment »

September 20, 2005

Liberalism/socialism, the bigger enemy

From Rush Limbaugh:

But as I say, Bush essentially was saying, "Okay, libs, tried it your way down there for 60 years, now we're going to try it our way. Enterprise zones, attempts to get poor people into ownership of homes and businesses, et cetera." And I think that this has paralyzed the left even more. I think it's screwed them. What can they do? What can they do? It's exactly what they would have done, minus the conservative aspects. All they can do is complain and moan, as Kerry, Reid, and Pelosi are already doing, and guess who's moving forward? George W. Bush and those who joined him. And folks, I'm going to tell you something. At this stage, I am for anything, almost anything that wipes out the American left, because I have had it with the American left. If the American left hadn't dominated down there, even with this storm, the losses would not have been to the extent that they are. So anything that wipes these people out is fine and dandy with me. Anything that renders them politically impotent is fine with me, at this stage. You know, you balance all these things that we face in the future, and I'm telling you something. Liberalism/socialism, I don't care what you think about it, it represents a bigger enemy than whatever government spending and the way it's going to be spent in putting back together an American city in the Gulf Coast region.

Public education links

Blog powered by TypePad

Tracking