Sibby stumps the Democrats
The post I made regarding the South Daktoa Democrats billboard has the South Daktoa Democrats stumped. Here is all Chad Schuldt can say:
Trent spanks Sibby for his typical nuttiness yesterday about the Grassroot Democrats billboards in Sibby’s hometown.
Looks like Schuldt can't answer the following question:
Do those who support that billboard support the Virgin Mary’s right to chose aborting Jesus?
Chad Schuldt cannot give an honest answer so he resorts to calling me names. No wonder Daschle lost in 2004. Anyway, Trent did respond this way:
Really Sibby? We really need to answer a question as ridiculous as that? What if I say...YES. Then what? What does that mean? Does it mean I don't believe in God? Does it mean I don't believe Jesus was the son of God? Maybe it means that if I actually believe that Mary was really a virgin then I also believe that had she chosen to abort Jesus, God would have stepped in simply not allowed it. What can you tell from my answer Sibby? Please. Enlighten me.
At least Trent is honest and admits that the Democrat’s position is that the Virgin Mary should have the choice to abort Jesus. But then he admits that, "God would have stepped in simply not allowed it". So the Democrats know that God is against abortion. Its just that the Democrats are not on God’s side.
Trent ends his post with this:
Republicans, you can't have it both ways. If you're going to tell us how close to God you and your policies are, then don't get so defensive when Democrats gently remind everyone that Jesus and God are on our side sometimes too.
No Trent, I do believe God and Jesus is on your side. It is just that you Democrats are not on God’s side. Otherwise you would have had a problem with the Virgin Mary aborting God’s son Jesus. And you also would have a problem with anybody getting aborted, even the child of a rapist.
In addition the Democrats cannot accept their premise that taxing the rich to give to the poor is coveting. God expects us to take care of the poor through our own will. So then the Democrats also need to explain why Red states are more charitable than Blue states.
