Abortion, guns, and medical privacy

Now we have it. The far-left’s medical privacy to grant the right to kill pre-born babies is another lie. Now they choose to ignore medical privacy after the Virginia Tech massacre:

But Virginia court officials insist that because the judge ordered only outpatient treatment—and did not commit Cho to a psychiatric hospital—they were not required to submit the information to be entered in the federal databases for background checks.

Lawmakers pushed Sunday to eliminate such breakdowns. They called for uniformity between state and federal reporting to make background checks more dependable.

"I think everybody would agree that somebody with a psychological problem should not be allowed to purchase a weapon," said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. Republican lawmakers appearing on the Sunday news programs agreed.

"There was a definite failure of communication, and that ought to be changed with federal legislation," said Sen. Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania.

Two New York Democrats, Sen. Chuck Schumer, and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, announced legislation Sunday that would require states to upgrade their reporting of mental health records to the federal database. The bill would provide new money to states to help them automate their records, but also apply financial penalties on states that do not comply.

So now we now what the left means by pro-choice, these elitists get to choose when to apply rights. Typical situational ethics by humanists. Funny how they choose to ignore medical privacy when it is regard to a true Constitutional right (the Second Amendment), and then choose to use medical privacy to create a Constitutional right that does not exist…abortion.