Cory Heidelberger goes after Bob Ellis and myself:
More often than not, Bob Ellis and Steve Sibson are the car wrecks of South Dakota blogging: so ugly and gruesome I can't help looking.
But as I read Senator R.F. Pettigrew's Triumphant Plutocracy this very white Christmas, the spirit of South Dakota's first US Senator and patron saint of prairie radicals compels me to write the following: Ellis and Sibson are deluded tools of the plutocracy.Bob and Sibby aren't completely wrong. There is a vast secular, globalist threat to Christianity and family values, perpetrated by amoral agents devoted only to increasing their own power. it's called global corporate capitalism. Corporations have no God, no morality. Corporations care by design and duty for nothing but increased profits. They don't care what god you worship or what country you live in: they just want your money, your labor, and your loyalty/slavery.
I am not sure how Heidelberger can charge me with being a deluded tool of plutocracy, because my post that he referenced included this:
A key is the phrase public-private partnership that has been seen more and more often during the past decade. This means close ties between government and business. What results is not capitalism but corporatism – in which corporations and government cooperate both to discourage the open competition characteristic of genuine capitalism in favor of policy that is established and administered jointly, with each side doing favors with the other (e.g., "tax incentives" for business; support going to certain candidates for political office from business). This method is clearly a species of central planning.
And one of the examples I gave was the public-private partnership between the State Of South Dakota and SDN communications in regard to the High Speed REED. Heidelberger approves of that project. So when the plutocracy fits his special interest, his populist agenda goes out the window. I have more research on SDN, but I will leave that for another time. I bring it up here to set up the argument that it is the secular humanists that are guilty of being "deluded tools of the plutocracy" as they undermine traditional American values in order to establish their utopian one-world government.
Here is a link to a Paul Kurtz piece titled, "The New American Plutocracy". Kurtz piece is meant to undermine traditional American Principles and Christianity. Paul Kurtz also wrote the Humanist Manifesto II that states:
We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty and to move toward the building of a world community in which all sectors of the human family can participate. Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government.
And it is through this on-world government that Marxism will be implemented:
The problems of economic growth and development can no longer be resolved by one nation alone; they are worldwide in scope. It is the moral obligation of the developed nations to provide — through an international authority that safeguards human rights — massive technical, agricultural, medical, and economic assistance, including birth control techniques, to the developing portions of the globe. World poverty must cease. Hence extreme disproportions in wealth, income, and economic growth should be reduced on a worldwide basis.
Yeah, we all will be impoverished, so that means economic justice? Ask the people of the Soviet Union how well Marxism. And in case you don’t think communism prevents plutocracy, check this out about Vladimir Putin:
An unprecedented battle is taking place inside the Kremlin in advance of Vladimir Putin's departure from office, the Guardian has learned, with claims that the president presides over a secret multibillion-dollar fortune.
Rival clans inside the Kremlin are embroiled in a struggle for the control of assets as Putin prepares to transfer power to his hand-picked successor, Dmitry Medvedev, in May, well-placed political observers and other sources have revealed.
At stake are billions of dollars in assets belonging to Russian state-run corporations. Additionally, details of Putin's own personal fortune, reportedly hidden in Switzerland and Liechtenstein, are being discussed for the first time.
And remember my post on how Hillary Clinton and Marc Tucker are working to federalize education in order to implement their…it takes a global village? Check this out:
Here comes another inconvenient truth. Despite all the attention to Oprah for Obama and the pundit blabbering about the Democratic primary horse race the outcome has been predetermined. What people do not want to know is that power elites control what the Democratic ticket will be. When the primaries end the winner will be the reigning plutocracy.
Rich and powerful elites want Hillary Clinton the White House if the Democrats get their turn in the rigged two-party system. Just one big problem: The establishment plutocracy wants her more than most Americans trust or like her. No matter how much she spends and no matter how many big name endorsements she gets, her phoniness and arrogance prevail. She would be America's irritating Panderer-in-Chief. What to do?
For power elites the answer is crystal clear. Obama is too young and inexperienced and less trustworthy for the elites, meaning he is less corrupted by big money than Hillary. But he is perfect to offset Hillary's negatives. A majority of voters can succumb to months of slick advertising promoting the first woman president and first black vice-president and future president. And eight years as vice president will train Obama to be an obedient Washington insider.
If Cory Heidelberger, Paul Kurtz and another secular humanist have a problem with plutocracy, they better take a close look at what they are promoting. Undermining American sovereignty and Jesus Christ in order to have one-world communism will do nothing but make these power elites who are in charge wealthy. Just take the time and look at all the United Nation’s scandals.
And based on what Cory has posted, I do believe he is interested in populism. I would like to point him to a link I have in my TransCanada Pipeline sidebar titled, "Globalists vs us all" (Read the whole thiung, it is really good). Excerpt:
The forced and obvious conclusion is that the people in Washington are neither Democrats nor Republicans. Some of those species are still found endangered, inhabiting the crevasses in the House of Representatives, but a few score mating pairs is not a lot. But there are no Republicans nor Democrats left in the Executive or the Senate. These people are exclusively globalists, and the next election is important because of that party.
So, the 2008 election will be fought out between globalists on one hand (Romney, Giuliani, McCain, Thompson, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Biden and Dodd) and American sovereign parties on the other (Tancredo, Hunter, Paul and Kucinich). It will be a mistake and a mirage for Americans to believe any longer in the Democrat-Republican political theatre, which has been mass packaged by the media for our consumption. These Grammy-winning musicals only exist to play the masses off one another so the globalists, who have dictated the entire top money-tiers of both parties, may forge ahead with their plan to obliterate American sovereignty and crush the peoples beneath their plans for high profits and the global police state. To again gain the privilege of actually having the liberal-conservative contest, populists on both sides must throw out the tops of both parties. What happens in political reality today is a dumb show of convenience, that the puppeteers might install that most beautiful globalist who gets chosen "best actor."
Cory has a post that defends Kucinich. Bob Ellis seems to be pushing Hunter. I haven’t heard boo about Hunter in the media. I have been hearing a little on Ron Paul, and the more I hear and read, the more I like his message.So I hope Cory understands that there are populist-minded conservatives/Republicans. Some of us are trying to hold our leaders accountable. Not all of us follow the Party line like Pat Powers. I hope Cory will also do his part to hold those in the Democrat Party accountable.
I hope that getting the word out regarding the secular humanist's role in American culture opens some eyes. I certainly don’t want "deluded tools of the plutocracy" to continue to be in the dark. Traditional American principles and those who believe in Jesus Christ are not the problem. It is abandonment of Jesus Christ and traditional American principles that will give the plutocrats even more money and power. And that power is not just about money. The current education system is geared to provide what Cory calls slaves to the power elites.
