Wolves in sheep’s clothing

[UPDATE: Here is a link to an update to this post.]

I see Pat Powers has made my point with another anti-conservative rant that included attacks toward me for "cutting and pasting" content. On the very next post, Pat Powers cut and pasted 788 words. It is typical of liberal elitists to set rules for others, but not follow them themselves.

And he is making a big deal out of his ten questions, but he has yet to answer the twelve that I have presented. Again, do as I say, not as I do.

And like those on the far-left, Pat Powers seems to be sensitive about the truth being told about the worldview of secular humanists. Somehow he classifies that as being invective, but doesn’t think twice abut trashing others and finding it humorous when an anonymous blogger trashed the conservatives who supported John Thune. It should make conservatives wonder why Pat Powers is so sensitive about one who helps the conservative cause understand its enemy…the secular humanist movement. Perhaps it is because his livelihood includes his wife’s public education participation in the secular humanist movement.

Pat Powers also failed to address the point my research made…there has been a divide in the SD GOP for a long time. Even his Democrat buddy Todd Epp agrees with that. And Epp makes the point that this feud between Pat Powers and myself is the continuation of the conservative versus liberal SD GOP battle. As Pat Powers falsely claims that he is a conservative and I am not, I don’t think that Todd Epp would say that I am the liberal is this dual.

And if Pat Powers doesn’t like being exposed as the Judas Iscariot of the conservative movement, then he should have watched what he said in Pierre during a pro-life rally. Clearly conservatives do not owe Pat Powers a thing, including answers to his ten questions.

Beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing.

(Note that I did not cut and paste a single word.)