In my previous post, "Mac" said this:
Sibby, to continue to put things in proper perspective and to get away from your looney and paranoid diatribes, let me quote one of your favorite Presidents, George Herbert Walker Bush way back in 1991: "We have before us...the opportunity to forge for ourselves and future generations...a New World Order. A World where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations...when we are successful...and we will be...we have a real chance at this New World Order." Our current President took the pain staking steps to continue or reconcillation with the Muslim world. It was not a "foreign policy blunder" as you assert, but one more crucial step in successfully securing the New World Order. That is fact and that is not one of your kooky conspiracy theories.
So Pat Powers needs to understand that I am not paranoid believer in a conspiracy theory. And Mac is actually in favor of it. So what I said earlier about Sotomayor is right on the mark (and note; it is through the education system the "The Order" is implementing their radical Marxist based takeover of America):
The real difference between Sotomayor and Alito is this:
Yet as Obama's "empathy" nominee, she may need to stress rule of law over experience in her hearing, just to show she's not a judicial activist.
Rule of Law means adhering to the Natural Law foundation of the Constitution, as Alito does. The anti-constitutionalists advocate a "living" document that can be changed do to "historical experience". Note the word "historical" and that Sotomayor was a Yale law school graduate as you read this:
In the 1850s, three members of The Order left Yale and working together, at times with other members along the way, made a revolution that changed the face, direction and purpose of American education. It was a rapid, quiet revolution, and eminently successful. The American people even today, in 1983, are not aware of a coup d'etat.
The revolutionary trio were:
Timothy Dwight ('49) Professor in the Yale Divinity School and then 12th President of Yale University.
Daniel Coit Gilman ('52), first President of the University of California, first President of the Johns Hopkins University and first President of the Carnegie Institution.
Andrew Dickson White ('53), first President of Cornell University and first President of the American Historical Association.
Gilman is the key. Both John Dewey, the father of "Progressive" education and Woodrow Wilson attended the John Hopkins graduate school in the 1880s. And remember this from yesterday:
The story of big government in America begins in the Progressive Era, stretching from the 1880s through World War I. Enamored with 19th-century European historicist philosophy and unwilling to hold any truths as self-evident, American Progressives thought the natural right principles of the Constitution represented the greatest obstacle to political "progress" and "evolution." In place of the Constitution, Progressivism proposed an administrative state whose purpose would be the unending quest of evolutionary "progress" and whose powers therefore would be unlimited.
More than anyone, Woodrow Wilson advanced the new Progressive theory of human nature and human institutions and the corresponding Progressive critique of the principles of the American Founding and the Founders' Constitution. Wilson, who was president of Princeton and of the American Political Science Association before becoming President of the United States, was the first Chief Executive to openly criticize the Constitution, once comparing it to "political witchcraft." So hostile was he to the self evident truths of the Founding that in a 1911 address he remarked, "if you want to understand the real Declaration of Independence, do not repeat the preface."
The Progressive theory is based on Hegel (again note the 19th-century Eurpoean "historicist" as this relates to those who view the Constitution as "living") , who influenced both Dewey and Wilson while at John Hopkins:
This notable trio were all initiated into The Order within a few years of each other (1849, 1852, 1853). They immediately set off for Europe. All three went to study philosophy at the University of Berlin, where post-Hegelian philosophy had a monopoly.
- Dwight studied at the Universities of Berlin and Bonn between 1856 and 1858,
- Gilman was at the University of Berlin between 1854 and 55 under Karl von Ritter and Friedrich Trendelenberg, both prominent "Right" Hegelians, and
- White studied at the University of Berlin between 1856 and 1858.
Notably also at the University of Berlin in 1856 (at the Institute of Physiology) was none other than Wilhelm Wundt, the founder of experimental psychology in Germany and the later source of the dozens of American Ph.D.s who came back from Leipzig, Germany to start the modern American education movement.
Why is the German experience so important? Because these were the formative years, the immediate post-graduate years for these three men, the years when they were planning the future, and at this period Germany was dominated by the Hegelian philosophical ferment.
There were two groups of these Hegelians. The right Hegelians, were the roots of Prussian militarism and the spring for the unification of Germany and the rise of Hitler. Key names among right Hegelians were Karl Ritter (at the University of Berlin where our trio studied), Baron von Bismarck, and Baron von Stockmar, confidential adviser to Queen Victoria over in England. Somewhat before this, Karl Theodor Dalberg (1744-1817), arch-chancellor in the German Reich, related to Lord Acton in England and an Illuminati (Baco v Verulam in the Illuminati code), was a right Hegelian.
There were also Left Hegelians, the promoters of scientific socialism. Most famous of these, of course, are Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Heinrich Heine, Max Stirner and Moses Hess.
The point to hold in mind is that both groups use Hegelian theory of the State as a start point, i.e., the State is superior to the individual. Prussian militarism, Naziism and Marxism have the same philosophic roots.
Today we have a nearly complete Marxist based takeover of America by the fascist Progressive movement. The above research explains how the movement was created. And it is not just about Democrats:
America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones by Antony C. Sutton - the complete book with more details & facts about the hidden forces behind modern public education, psychology, economics, politics and world chaos. Covers Yale University's link to a secret German society, the Bush Family (i.e. George), and much more. Very well reserached and written.
Suggested Reading List - the Demise of the Educational System - OBE (Outcome-Based Education), NEA (National Education Association), educational psychology, German psychology & influences, demise of public education, educational sabotage, Wundt, Pavlov, Dewey, Skinner, Watson.
Heidelberger needs to note the "Bush Family".
It is the education system that is moving America, including both political parties, to the radical left. Fundamentally, a RINO is a member of the GOP who adheres to the Progressive agenda. They are about destroying the Natural Law foundation of America that created liberty. And Pat Powers is one of their crusaders. His problem lies with a relationship with an Educrat. And it is due to education that Powers does not have the capability to understand the ideological problem facing politics today. We really don't have a two party system, we have one Progressive party and two fraternities from Yale.
Comments