Limbaugh points out the Progressive agenda of the Planned Parenthood and the feminazis who lead it, which then gives us insight into the thinking of Sotomayor:
The Sunday New York Times published a recent interview with Supreme Court Justice Ruth "Buzzi" Ginsburg, and after expressing her annoyance over a 1980 decision that forbids using Medicaid tax dollars for abortions, Justice Ginsburg said this. I want to quote it: "Frankly, I had thought at the time Roe was decided, The Sunday New York Times published a recent interview with Supreme Court Justice Ruth "Buzzi" Ginsburg, and after expressing her annoyance over a 1980 decision that forbids using Medicaid tax dollars for abortions, Justice Ginsburg said this. I want to quote it: "Frankly, I had
That was the original purpose. I think in Ruth "Buzzi" Ginsburg's case, when she says that she thinks Roe was about "population growth, particularly growth in populations who don't have too many of," she's probably thinking about aborting conservatives. But the problem with that is it's the liberals that are aborting each other, or themselves, their future generations. Now, what's astounding about this is that a matriarch of modern liberalism was candid about the underlying objective of the abortion movement: That is to rid society of entire populations deemed "unworthy." Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was an early proponent of this. It's called eugenics, and her aim was to wipe out the African-American population.
Other infamous world figures acted upon similar instincts using other means to achieve their objectives: Concentration camps, mass gassings, so-called ethnic cleansings. Planned Parenthood is no different. Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood is no different than any of the people that use concentration camps, mass gassings, so-called ethnic cleansings. And what's just ironic as it can be is that the primary supporters of Planned Parenthood are liberals. But here comes Ruth "Buzzi" Ginsburg just out of the box admitting what this is all about. Now, it is all about "a woman's right to choose." I mean, that's the umbrella under which it all happens. But the thing about this group, Planned Parenthood... You put up an adoption center next to an abortion clinic and what will happen is the Planned Parenthood people come out and try to keep every pregnant woman possible from going into the adoption center.
There's money involved and all of that. Now, Justice Ginsburg has not yet stated which American population she would like to see wiped out using Medicaid, taxpayer-funded abortions. The New York Times interviewer didn't ask. Perhaps she assumed that New York Times readers already know what population of Ruth "Buzzi"... I'm mentioning this now because we got another one of these type people being investigated today at confirmation hearings. Sonia Sotomayor is probably right down the path with justice Ruth "Buzzi" Ginsburg on this issue. Well, see, to somebody like me who can read the stitches on the fastball and read between the lines, Justice Ginsburg's remarks tell the real story. They ought to dispel for all time any notion that the abortion movement is about privacy or choice or freedom, and it should also tell you why they are so damned... (I must say this) insistent that Medicaid -- that's poor people medical care -- money be used for abortions. I'll tell you why liberals reacted so strongly to my term "feminazi." My term feminazi hit waaaaay too close to home.
Read the Background Material...
• New York Times: The Place of Women on the Court
• CNSNews: Justice Ginsburg Says She Originally Thought Roe v. Wade Was Designed to Limit 'Populations That We Don't Want to Have Too Many Of'
• NewsBusters: Whiff of Eugenics: Ginsburg Tells NYT Roe Was About 'Populations That We Don't Want .... Too Many Of'
Comments