Here is another bloody shoe on the left's foot. Again, remember how the Progressives point to violent acts such as McVeigh and blame conservatives. Here are some details on yesterday's shooting at the miltary base in Texas:
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 11 people before being shot dead at Fort Hood, had said Muslims should "rise up" and attack Americans in retaliation for the US war in Iraq, a former army colleague said last night.
And then there is this:
Federal law enforcement officials say the suspected Fort Hood, Texas, shooter had come to their attention at least six months ago because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings and other threats.
The officials say the postings appeared to have been made by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who was killed during the shooting incident that left least 11 others dead and 31 wounded. The officials say they are still trying to confirm that he was the author. They say an official investigation was not opened.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case.
One of the Web postings that authorities reviewed is a blog that equates suicide bombers with a soldier throwing himself on a grenade to save the lives of his comrades.
And add this:
Officials were investigating whether Hasan was his birth name or if he may have changed his name, possibly as part of a conversion to Islam. However, they were not certain of his religion.
So what would have prevented the military from throwing, what looks like an Islamic enemy, from their ranks? Would the diversity nuts of the far-left Cultural Marxist movement scream discrimination? If so, then who now has blood on their hands? Or should I say on their foot. And let us not forget to add the anti-war peaceniks to the bloody shoe on the left foot.
So what are the anti-gun left going to say...ban guns in the military?
Comments