Typical for Cory Heidelberger to twist the truth. His cultural Neo-Marxists worldview promotes hatred toward whites and males:
This is not a joke. This is an observation by sociologist Michael Kimmel, author of Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era, who tells the UK Guardian that the angry manly rage that fuels both ISIS and Trump stems from a sense of smallness:
One of the most prescient observers of violence I’ve ever read, James Gilligan, wrote a book called Violence. He argued that shame and humiliation underlie basically all violence: “Because I feel small, I will make you feel smaller.”
In my interviews with extremists, both “actives” and “formers”, I have found time and time again that they have experienced that sense of humiliation and shame.
In his famous statement, Osama bin Laden talked about how the west had humiliated the Muslim world … that conservative Muslims have been humiliated by hyper-modern society and the cosmopolitan McDonaldization of the world. For them, restoring the seventh-century caliphate is their way of reinstating traditional masculinity.
I call this “aggrieved entitlement”. If you feel entitled and you have not gotten what you expected, that is a recipe for humiliation.
It is the liberal left who suffer from “aggrieved entitlement”, which helps explains this:
Black-clad activists among hundreds of demonstrators protesting Donald Trump's swearing-in on Friday clashed with police a few blocks from the White House, in an outburst of violence rare for an inauguration.
At least 217 people were arrested in the melees, police said.
It he Cory Heidelberger and his fellow Neo-Marxist Trump haters who are guilty of being small, while they try to make whites, males, Christians, and conservatives look small. And you saw it on the Democratic side of the isle last hinght during Trumps address to Congress.
And Cory must believe that ISIS is a ban of Caucasians, or he has taken his level of false propaganda to a higher level. He must still be having trouble processing what happened during the last election, as his ability to think rationally has almost totally disappeared.
Also note his source falsely labeled bin Laden and his "radicalized" followers to be "conservative Muslims". Here is the truth:
The radical faction of Islam, known as the Salafi, are a movement created through British intrigue and coordination with occult secret societies, toward fomenting a “Clash of Civilizations”. And though the West is largely unaware of them, they are almost entirely responsible for the extremism that Islam is mistakenly perceived for.
Zarqawi, in his letter to bin Laden, described the Mujahideen, those who have been duped by the CIA to believe they are fighting a “holy war”, as follows: “These are the quintessence of the Sunnis and the good sap of this country. In general, they belong to the Sunni doctrine and naturally to the Salafi creed.”
That is, until the 19th century, and the advent of colonialism, and the common British strategy of “Divide and Rule”, which evidently exercised its hand in disrupting this situation. According to the Wikipedia article on Shariah:
During the 19th century the history of Islamic law took a sharp turn due to new challenges the Muslim world faced: the West had risen to a global power and colonized a large part of the world, including Muslim territories. Societies changed from the agricultural to the industrial stage. New social and political ideas emerged and social models slowly shifted from hierarchical towards egalitarian. The Ottoman Empire and the rest of the Muslim world were in decline, and calls for reform became louder. In Muslim countries, codified state law started replacing the role of scholarly legal opinion. Western countries sometimes inspired, sometimes pressured, and sometimes forced Muslim states to change their laws. Secularist movements pushed for laws deviating from the opinions of the Islamic legal scholars. Islamic legal scholarship remained the sole authority for guidance in matters of rituals, worship, and spirituality, while they lost authority to the state in other areas. The Muslim community became divided into groups reacting differently to the change. This division persists until the present day (Brown 1996, Hallaq 2001, Ramadan 2005, Aslan 2006, Safi 2003).
* Secularists believe the law of the state should be based on secular principles, not on Islamic legal theory.
* Traditionalists believe that the law of the state should be based on the traditional legal schools. However, traditional legal views are considered unacceptable by most modern Muslims, especially in areas like women’s rights or slavery..
* Reformers believe that new Islamic legal theories can produce modernized Islamic law  and lead to acceptable opinions in areas such as women’s rights.
* Salafis strive to follow Muhammad and his companions, tabiin (followers of the Companions), tabiut tabiin (followers of the tabiin) and those who follow these 3 generations.
An excellent article has now been posted, however, at Salafi Publications, which not only admits, but thoroughly exposes, the Masonic and deviant origins of the founders of the Salafi movement, and their successors, the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Muslim Brotherhood is a far cry from white male Trump supporters. Instead the Muslim Brotherhood have been working with the global oligarchy that Trump is challenging, who want cheap labor via illegal immigration. Sad that Cory sides with the crony capitalists' "Divide and Rule" agenda that oppresses the working class.
The Democratic versus Republican feud is just another example of the oligarchy's methods of "Divide and Rule". Sad that Cory refuses to see that, instead of feeling small and throwing stones at Republicans.