Cory Heidelberger and his herd of indoctrinated Neo-Marxists are reacting to Trump's foreign policy positions with this:
President Bill Clinton laid out the surest way to beat ISIS in his speech last night: “If you’re a Muslim and you love America and freedom and you hate terror, stay here and help us win and make a future together. We want you.”
Cory and Bill Clinton are 100% wrong. ISIS needs a means to infiltrate American borders, and Clinton's policy provides that. As I will discuss later in this post, the Clintons are part of the global economic and power elite. In order for them to get America to go along with global governance, America can no longer be great. The Muslim Brotherhood, in concert with the Black Lives Matter movement, could help bring about that destruction of America the great. Cory is too much of a partisan to see that as a possibility. Nor is such discussion welcome on his so-called Dakota Free Press.
As Cory supports Islamic fascism by accusing the opposition of promoting fear, he is himself promoting fear of Russians:
“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Mr. Trump’s call was an extraordinary moment at a time when Russia is being accused of meddling in the U.S. presidential election. His comments came amid questions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s computer servers, which researchers have concluded was likely the work of two Russian intelligence agencies [Ashley Parker, “Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails,” New York Times, 2016.07.27].
Of course, whether or not you believe that may depend on how credible you find the big cybersecurity firms like CrowdStrike, FireEye and Mandiant (the big names that always pop up in situations like this). For what it's worth, these guys have something of a vested interest in playing up the threat of big hacks from nation-state level hackers. For a good analysis of why this finger-pointing may be less than credible, I recommend two articles by Jeffrey Carr, one noting that these firms come from a history of "faith-based attribution" whereby they are never held accountable for being wrong -- and another highlighting serious questions about the designation of Russia as being responsible for this particular hack (he notes that some of the research appeared to come pre-arrived at that conclusion, and then ignored any evidence to the contrary).
Still, the claim that the data came from the Russians has become something of a story itself. And, of course, who did the hack and got the info is absolutely a news story. But it's an entirely separate one from whether or not the leaked emails contain anything useful or newsworthy. And yet, because this is the peak of political silly season, some are freaking out and claiming that anyone reporting on these emails "has been played" by Putin and Russia. Leaving aside the fact that people like to claim that Russia's behind all sorts of politicians that some don't like, that should be entirely unrelated to whether or not the story is worth covering.
And yet, we already have stories arguing that "Putin weaponized Wikileaks to influence" the US election. That's ridiculous on multiple levels. Wikileaks releases all kinds of stuff, whether you agree with them or not. And the idea that this will actually impact the election seems... unlikely. Is the (not at all surprising) fact that the DNC is fully of cronyism and favoritism really suddenly going to shift voters to Trump? Of course, Wikileaks implicitly threatening someone with legal action for saying there's a connection between Russia and Wikileaks is pretty ridiculous as well.
The media is now reporting on the unproven myth, creating by the false flag propaganda, that Russia is supporting Trump in order to change the subject from the issue of the Democratic leadership undermining Bernie Sanders in order to get their global crony capitalist into the White House. This shows again how the media is working for the economic elite. Republicans need to discard the notion that "capitalism" is "conservative". Today's capitalism is an implementation of liberal corporate capitalism, which has replaced a free market with an "administered" market via a partnership between big government and the private business sector.
If the Democrats are truly concerned about foreign influence on American elections, then they should note this:
For over 14 years, Daniel Estulin has investigated and researched the Bilderberg Group’s far-reaching influence on business and finance, global politics, war and peace, and control of the world’s resources and its money.
His book, “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” was published in 2005 and is now updated in a new 2009 edition. He states that in 1954, “the most powerful men in the world met for the first time” in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, “debated the future of the world,” and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a who’s who of world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media figures, and invited others – some quietly by some accounts like Barack Obama and many of his top officials.
Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB’s Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England’s Mervyn King.
As you see, the Democrats (specifically the Clintons, that is why Hilary was Secretary of State) are part of the agenda whereby the world's power elites influence our elections. And so are some of the Republican Establishment. Cory cannot allow his readers to understand that the Establishments of both parties are covertly working together. That might cause them to pause in their hate fest for a moment.
And Cory's faith in NATO is daft and dangerous:
Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided “to create an ‘Aristocracy of purpose’ between Europe and the United States (to reach consensus to rule the world on matters of) policy, economics, and (overall) strategy.” NATO was essential for their plans – to ensure “perpetual war (and) nuclear blackmail” to be used as necessary. Then proceed to loot the planet, achieve fabulous wealth and power, and crush all challengers to keep it.
I have made efforts to provide Cory and his ban of indoctrinated Neo-Marxists with reality, but they can't handle it as the Madville's latest ban on my comments continues at their so-called Dakota Free Press. The truth seems to get into the way of their hate fest, that is fueled by Heidelberger's propaganda.