[UPDATE: Now that Pat Powers has allowed you SDWC readers to see what I am posting, perhaps you may want to go over to Madville TImes and ask Cory why he removed this blog post from his sidebar. What is it that he does not want his readers to know?]
Cory Heidelberger being thought of as a totalitarian teacher can easily be supported by all the posts he has done recently insisting that South Dakota Schools only allow law enforcement the right to bear arms. By definition that would make our schools a totalitarian police state. Last week we have an even more troubling example. Cory's wife found a posting that attacks one of Cory's totalitarian ideas...that we have government healthcare. He ends his post with this:
Your question for morning coffee: where are the left-wing posters that are anywhere near as nutty and deliberately deceptive as the right-wing hysteria that seems to surround us here in South Dakota?
If you go to the links Cory used in the above bigotry directed at those Cory disagrees with, you wil see that I effectively stood my ground as I proved that the positions were not nutty, hysterical, nor deceptive. I detailed some of my research with an earlier post. So I provided an answer to Cory's question:
Cory, you are that left-wing poster.
Cory responded with:
No, no, no. Someone other than Steve needs to answer this question. I'm not talking about those of us who bother to refute right-wing nuttiness. I'm asking for examples of lefties who make entirely new claims. Where is the active, original left-wing delusion and deception? (My contention here, of course, is that we liberals just don't do that kind of thing.)
So Cory is not able to counter my point, and instead wants to direct everyone to think like he thinks. So again, I challenged Cory's bigoted deceptions and responded to his faithful followers. At the end of the day, Cory deleted all my comments and left this note:
Hey, everyone, I've put Sibby on time-out. Let's be cool, and let's be real.
So is that how Cory treats all his students who disagree with the deceptive propaganda being forced down their throats in the government schools? Not only did he put me in "time-out" he put a gag over my mouth as not only all of my comments have been deleted, I have been blocked from adding more, including this one:
"(My contention here, of course, is that we liberals just don't do that kind of thing.)"
Cory, Dana P. gave us the example that destroys your contention, right here on this thread:
"No Sibby. It isn't because you are a Republican that your ideas are automatically without facts. It is because you quote discredited sources and ideas that are without any factual basis. You do know that these hucksters/carnival barkers are getting super-rich, taking money from people such as yourself - who don't want to ever question where in the heck they are getting their.....uh hem... ideas."
http://madvilletimes.com/2013/03/spearfish-crazies-warn-of-soviet-socialized-medicine-camps/#comment-130858
And then Cory deletes my responses to the Democrat's conspiracy theory. SO totalitarian.
That's Cory Heidelberger, the totalitarian teacher. His hatred and bigotry was also directed at Representative Jon Hansen:
In good news, Pat Powers reports the misogynist Rep. Jon Hansen (R-25/Dell Rapids) will quit the job District 25 elected him to do and enroll in law school this fall.
Cory's nuttiness has no ends:
Hansen will probably come out of law school a greater threat to my wife and daughter, not a better more respectful citizen. Must blog harder!
When Pat Powers exposed Cory's retiring from the Spearfish Schools and moving out of state, a comment by Julie Gross sums up Cory's "blog":
I hope that his brand of vindictiveness, personal grudge, and hate for anyone unlike himself can be turned around into tolerance.
I won’t hold my breath though.
I suspect that his homophobic & bigoted rants on his blog and at SD Magazine led to his current troubles.
Yes, Cory has completely left reality and believes everyone else is who he himself is, but sees himself as a god. Actually, his partner in Crime Erin is the cause for his leaving Spearfish:
I’m Cory’s wife, and I’m the reason we’re leaving South Dakota…temporarily. I’m a candidate for ordained ministry in the ELCA and I’ve hit the internship stage of my seminary degree. We’ll be out of state for my year-long internship somewhere outside of South Dakota (I haven’t received my final placement yet). After I’m finished with seminary, we very much hope to come back to SD.
Cory's biggest piece of deception comes when he supports his anti-Christian positions by stating his Christian wife agrees. It is now time to expose her so-called Christian beliefs as heresy from her ECLA mainline apostate church. I will start with "One World Religion: The Destruction of Christianity – by Christians!":
The Theosophical Society is a worldwide association dedicated to practical realization of the oneness of all life (Pantheism) and to independent spiritual search (Gnosticism). It was founded in New York City in 1875 by Helena P. Blavatsky, a Russian Jew by birth, along with Henry Olcott, William Judge and others. Madame Blavatsky traveled for twenty years in Europe, the Americas, Asia and the Near East studying mysticism and occultism – the satanic connection.
The One World Religion, based on Theosophy and Freemasonry is under the auspices of the United Nations and its first goal is to bring all the Protestant churches back to the Catholic Church. Ecumenism has done much to hasten that goal with the signing of agreements such as “ Evangelicals and Catholics Together” and the agreement between the Catholic Church and the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA).
And then there is this:
It's very interesting how naive Christian people can be. A member of the Task Force on Sexuality for the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, defending its acceptance of masturbation and same-sex marriage, said, "We are not coming in with an agenda." There's no agenda? These poor people don't understand that there even is an agenda! But that radical Jewish feminist I mentioned understands quite well that there is an agenda. She said this; "The feminist movement in Western culture is engaged in the slow execution of Christ and Yahweh. Yet very few of the women and men now working for social equality within Christianity and Judaism realize the extent of their heresy." This woman, by the way, has become a witch.
This is the reconstruction of human sexuality for the age of Aquarius. This is the new human being for the spiritual monistic world of tomorrow. I believe that, while we need to show love and openness to all these poor folk who have for one reason or another been brought into these perversions, ultimately we have to show them that this is part of a massive spiritual apostasy.
That was the ending to a lecture by Dr. Peter Jones. I am most of my way through his book, Spirit Wars: Pagan Revival in Christian America. He also wrote this:
You remember it was often thought that the great threat to America was the "Commies," the materialistic, atheistic Marxists, and there was a great fear at one point that America would be invaded. But it's very interesting that eventually America has been changed from the inside. There was no need for external invasion. I think it is extremely ironic that the Presidio, which was one of the great jewels of American military might, is now the place where the once-leader of the evil empire, Mikhail Gorbachev, has his State of the World Forum.
There are a couple of organizations there, actually. There's the State of the World Forum, the Gorbachev Foundation, which is a green movement to save the planet, and then also in the Presidio right now is a movement by the name of The United Religions, lead by Bishop Swing, not to be confused with Bishop Spong.
Cory doesn't like it when I try to explain to him that he is helping set up a "New Age Theocracy". Jones gives us the facts that are not welcome at the Madville Times:
The Temple of Understanding is one arm of the Theosophical Society. And a little later I want to show you how Mikhail Gorbachev is related to the Theosophical Society. The first Theosophical Society was founded in Chicago in 1870 by a Russian princess, Madame Blavatsky, who communicated with "ascended masters," namely the occult.
The Temple of Understanding is affiliated with the Gaia Institute and with the United Nations Global Committee of Parliamentarians on Population Development. In that group there is a very well known New Age leader, a Canadian billionaire by the name of Maurice Strong, who also proposes a one-world government. Maurice Strong, who has recently been asked by Kofi Annan to reorganize the United Nations, has a ranch in Colorado, where he has built a Babylonian sun god temple which serves as a center of New Age religious activities. He was the organizer of the first U.N. Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.
You see, these people are not simply playing around. They are not simply "spiritual people" who are concerned about religion. They have significant places of power in our world today. I really want to make that point. We can try to laugh off these organizations as if they didn't have much punch or influence, but I am beginning to wonder if that is the case.
And that would be the birth place of Agenda 21. And Cory has tried to argue that Agenda 21 in "non-binding", so those of us who voice concerns are just "crazies". Here we see the kind of mindset these people really have:
The United Religions adopted the global ethic that was worked out at the Parliament of the World's Religions in 1993, which I attended. "Worked out" is perhaps saying too much. It was a document that had been prepared long before the Parliament. We never got to vote on it. It was actually written by Hans Kung, who is a liberal Roman Catholic with a brilliant mind, and it was adopted by the Parliament of the World's Religions.
Kung speaks about his global ethic as "an irrevocable, unconditional norm for all areas of life, for families and communities, for races, nations and religions," and insists that the acceptance of this global ethic is a requirement for being recognized as authentically human in the new global society.
Very much totalitarian, and there is GOP involvement along with their corporatists:
The State of the World Forum began in 1995 and yearly brings together many heads of state. The first one brought together one hundred forty-one heads of state and fifty-nine former heads of state. These are not insignificant people that are brought together in such a meeting. We're talking about former secretaries of state James Baker and George Schultz, both co-chairmen of the Forum, former president George Bush, former prime minister Margaret Thatcher, and many others. I have a whole list of these kinds of people. Add to that other folk from important walks of life-Walter Cronkite, Ted Koppel, Rupert Murdoch, the futurist Alvin Toffler, John Nesbit, Jane Goodall, the researcher into chimpanzees, Carl Sagan, Theodore Hessberg, who was president of Notre Dame, Milton Friedman, and Eli Weisel, the Jewish novelist. Gorbachev has brought these people together on a yearly basis.
...
This movement is significantly financed. Perhaps "significant" is too weak a word. Among the major contributors who belong to Mikhail Gorbachev's council of the wise are some of the richest men in the world: Microsoft's Bill Gates, Dwayne Andreas of Archer Daniels Midland, David Packard, the computer tycoon, Ted and Jane of CNN Time Warner, as well as George Zimmer of Men's Wearhouse. Some of these people, as you can tell, are extremely wealthy. Bill Gates has recently given 1.7 billion dollars to the United Nations to finance Planned Parenthood and condom distribution.
So lets get back to goddess Erin and the feminists:
In this lecture I've decided to really concentrate on one aspect of the "new agenda." In my previous lecture I discussed the ancient Gnostic overturning of the Genesis account, and it is interesting to note that one of the particular fall-outs of that attempt to get out from underneath the Creator's power was a complete redefinition of sexuality.
Is there anything new under the sun? You thought that the new sexual movements were totally brand new, but in the Gnostic texts there are exhortations to "beware of maternity." Women in the Gnostic sects were encouraged to not become mothers. Why? Because as a mother you are placing yourself within the structures of the creation, and therefore obliging yourself to participate in the reproduction of those horrendous creational structures. Saying 114 of the Gospel of Thomas, which has now been included with the four canonical gospels, ends on this incredible note-that "Mary will become a true Gnostic when she becomes like one of us men." That's the way to salvation, ladies-you have to become like a man. Is American culture going this way, by any chance?
So abortion is a response to the "curse" of childbearing. How amny times have you heard liberals complainingabout pregnant bearfoot women in the kitchen. And next we have the male-hating plank of the feminst movement:
The monists keep saying that the Christians think sex is evil and that we have to suppress it. Of course, that's a major lie; it's not the case at all. The Bible celebrates our sexuality, and it celebrates it by emphasizing the distinctions of sexuality, not by making everybody the same. But we live in a time that has developed a very seductive kind of apologetics. In this attempt to eliminate distinctions has risen a whole philosophy against "patriarchy," which is described as an immense male conspiracy to suppress and to harass women. In other words, the whole hierarchical structuring of society is the result of the male desire for domination.
Here is the anti-Biblical component of the feminist movement:
But today we are living in a time where we are told that patriarchy-which of course is the very notion that God has placed the responsibility for protection of the family in the hands of the father-is said to be "the great evil" to be extirpated from modern culture. It's no use fighting for the family and traditional values if you don't understand that. Of course, what you need to understand as well is that when you eliminate patriarchy, you eliminate the Great Patriarch of all, the God who made the heavens and the earth.
But the feminist movement is not the end game. Peter Jones provides us with this process:
Here's how the ideology goes: First of all, the identification of a crisis, then the dismantling of the structure that's creating the crisis, and then the promotion of a new paradigm, a new reconstruction in the light of what we've now learned.
So the crisis is Biblical patriarchy, and the feminists role is to deconstruct Biblical Chhristianity:
Rosemary Radford Ruether is a ruthless opponent of patriarchy and a leading feminist theologian who is invited to speak in all the mainline denominations and denominational seminaries, even though she often gives lectures on all the pagan goddesses.
...
She really is a pagan and says so very clearly. She finds paganism, the worship of various goddesses, much more inspiring and fulfilling than the Christian gospel. She is the one who says that modern theology cannot be done from the basis of the Bible anymore. So she really has moved outside of Christianity.
So the question is, does Erin already know this, or is this news to her...and Cory? ECLA is a "mainline denomination" and Erin is well along in their seminar process. And Cory is even giving up his job so she can finish. Either they are true believers or they are making a huge mistake. Perhaps both:
Virginia Mollenkott, who was a teacher at Nyack College for many years, who as a matter of fact recently came out publicly as a lesbian and really has moved light years away from her original Christian confession, also blames what she calls heteropatriarchy for virtually all social ills, including racism and classism. Here's what she says: "It is vital for us to understand the ways in which distorted concepts of human sexuality, gender distortions, and misconstructions of our God-language have blocked human freedom and healthy relationships." Patriarchy is found to be the cause for all social evils.
Seems that Cory would be on board with that, How about this:
These radical revolutions want to start from the beginning and raze to the ground what has been constructed. Here you have it in so-called evangelicals. Says Mollenkott: "If society is to turn from patriarchy to partnership, we must learn that lesbian, bisexual and gay issues are not just bedroom matters of 'doing whatever turns you on.'" In other words, this is no longer simply about freedom in the privacy of your own room to do what you want to do. Now, it's true that we don't want Big Brother television screens in all our bedrooms telling us what to do. But Mollenkott says that's not all that it's about. She says lesbian, bisexual and gay issues are "wedges driven into the superstructure of the heteropatriarchal system." Indeed, heteropatriarchy is today described as "sin" by some so-called Christian scholars. Anybody who would affirm that the norm is heterosexuality- let's leave aside for the moment the patriarchal element-anybody who affirms heterosexuality as the norm is guilty of sin, according to two scholars that I have cited here.
...
Jewish feminist, Naomi Goldenberg, who first met feminists in the seventies, realized that when you reject patriarchy, ultimately the God of the Bible has to go. In her book, Changing of the Gods, she says: "We women are going to bring an end to God" in the name of true spirituality.
That should make Cory happy, how about Erin? Now Jones explains the "reconstruction" phase:
I want to move quickly to the whole issue of reconstruction. If the crisis is heterosexual patriarchy, and if one approach is to begin to deconstruct the situation that has created that crisis, you surely cannot leave it there. You have to move to a new reconstruction, a new view of sexuality. What is true of this whole sexual movement is true in general.
The philosopher E.R. Norman recently said this: "Pluralism is a word society employs during the transition from one orthodoxy to another. Pluralism is a fundamentally unstable situation." In other words, from the Judeo-Christian culture we've had a deconstruction, and that has been the relativization of all notions. But you don't stay there. You cannot live in a relativized society, and so you move to a new absolutism. Pluralism is the word society employs during the transition from one orthodoxy, or one absolutism, to another.
This is true as well on the sexual level. The deconstruction of Judeo-Christian sexual norms has given rise to absolute chaos in our society. The more I travel, the more I realize how much we have all suffered from this sexual liberation. It seems like virtually everybody I meet is somehow affected by divorce. Even many Christian people are divorced. Society and our own personal lives have been ravaged by this so-called "liberation," by this so-called "relativization of norms."
But now we're moving to a new reconstruction. Not to worry-a new absolutism is on the way. What is it? Robert Muller, who was undersecretary of United Nations to the general secretary, and a key mover in the so-called "New Age Movement," was the plenary speaker at the Parliament of the World's Religions. He was making an appeal to a great global union of all things. He said this: "a new and higher form of humanity [is taking] control of the planet… Homo noeticus is the name I give to the emerging form of humanity." Homo noeticus-the new rational, spiritual human being.
What is this human being like? Well, this new human of pagan monism is no longer limited by the hard and fast separation of reality into right and wrong, true and false, male or female. Indeed, if the ultimate goal on the theological level is the joining of the opposites, the union of all things within the circle of life, the ultimate goal on the sexual plane is androgyny, the joining of the sexual opposites of male and female.
...
Mircea Eliade is an expert in the comparative history of all kinds of non-Christian religions. Mircea recently died. He said that the androgynous being sums up the goal of the mystical, monistic quest. Indeed, the psychologist Carl Jung believed that "homosexuality preserve[d] an archetype of the androgynous original person." So, Carl Jung, who has been very influential in thinking about psychology and who we are as people, argued that there is an ultimate ideal archetype of the androgynous human being.
...
You must admit that androgyny on the sexual level is a very powerful expression of monism, because it relativizes distinctions and finally brings the opposites to a sort of union. In very broad and theological terminology, I would argue this: that homosexuality, in particular androgyny, and in particular various expressions of that, such as bisexuality and androgyny, express a monistic view of the world, whereas heterosexuality expresses a theistic view of the world. Heterosexuality emphasizes distinction, just as theism emphasizes the distinction between God and the creation. Androgyny emphasizes the union of things, just as the monistic worldview eliminates the distinction between God and the creation.
...
Bisexuality certainly breaks down those distinctions, because someone who is engaging in bisexuality becomes both male and female. Homosexual couples experience this same reality, because both couples in a homosexual relationship get to be both the male and the female partner.
Pat Powers believes that this issue well be on the hot burner in South Dakota.
My view is that it isn’t going away, and we may be voting on it again within a decade, regardless of what one holds as their views.
As an issue that resides at the intersection of religion, government, family, and freedom, don’t underestimate the tidal forces pulling on it. Especially in a state where it’s easy to put a measure to the ballot.
And you can expect Cory to be using his fully paganized wife as ammunition to bring South Dakota into the ancient pagan anti-Christian New Age, all deceptively in the name of "Christianity". Such propaganda should be expected from a totalitarian teacher and a ELCA feminist activist. And once a majority of the population has accepted the pagan propaganda of the false public school teacher and the false preachers of the apostate churches, then those who disagree will be silenced. Just as Cory as silenced me at Madville Times. The One World religion will assist the making of the One World political system, all in the name of unity and the hope of world peace. But this is not a "New World Order", this is again a reconstuction of ancient pagan ways:
In Genesis 11:1-9, we learn of a united human race, one in both language and purpose, determined to build a tower in the Plain of Shinar. The construction of the tower was to serve as a monument to human achievement. The attitude of the builders was indicative of those who had rejected God as their Creator. Dr. Merrill F. Unger, in his well-known dictionary of the Bible, identifies the basic motivation underlying the entire project as “God-defying disobedience and pride” (Unger's Bible Dictionary, p. 114). In his book, New Age Globalism, H. Edward Rowe wrote:
We must not miss the central warning that resounds through the corridors of the long centuries to our time. The tower builders structured a mighty global organization, independent of God. They dedicated it to the establishment of a human unity which would secure them against the prospect of being scattered apart throughout the world (p. 6).
The Bible, of course, teaches us that God was very much displeased with such an effort, and , as a result, “confounded their language” and “scattered them abroad,” the very thing they were trying to prevent!
The descendants of the Babel builders are still with us today. Their plan for creating a “global society” is evident in their various writings. In Humanist Manifesto II, under the heading, “World Community,” we read:
We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty as to move toward the building of a world community... We look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government.
Elsewhere in the same document, we read:
What more daring a goal for humankind than for each person to become, in ideal as well as practice, a citizen of a world community.
According to this document:
No deity will save us: we must save ourselves.
As a result of the 1944 Dumbarton Oaks Proposal, as well as the 1945 Yalta and San Francisco Conferences, the United Nations Charter came into force on October 24, 1945. On December 14, 1946, the U.N. accepted a gift of $8.6 million from John D. Rockefeller, Jr., to buy the eighteen acres of land on New York's East River upon which the current U.N. building sits. The next year, the U.S. Congress approved a $65 million interest-free loan to finance the construction of the glass, stone, and steel tower dedicated to the enshrinement of “collective security.” Between 1945 and 1987, the United States contributed $17 billion of the estimated $87 billion spent by this organization. The nonaligned nations, which make up the majority of the United Nations delegations, have voted with the communist line fully 85 percent of the time in the General Assembly. Like the Tower of Babel before it, the United Nations, worshipping the false gods of man, all in the name of unity and security, represents a denial of the Lordship of Jesus Christ, the Creator, Sustainer, and Savior of the world. The builders of this modern-day Tower of Babel place man above God and the Almighty State above man.
The initial optimism with which the world was aglow after World War II has long since faded before the gruesome reality of some three-hundred plus civil and regional wars that have raged since 1945, including Korea and Vietnam (Fred Bruning, “The U.N. At Forty,” The Courier-Journal, September 22, 1985, p. D1). In addition, during these past forty-six years, there have been no shortages of bombings, assassinations, hijackings, and other such demonstrations of man's inhumanity to his fellowman.
This makes the Book of Revelation much easier to understand.That is for those fo us who have read and studied the entire Bible, and who go beyond the history taught in public schools with textbooks revised by Unesco. I hope you will not be among those deceived by those who call us crazies, wingnuts, and in need of mental therapy. Pick up a Bible, read it, and do some thinking for yourself. Unlike Erin Heidelberger, you will be equiped to preach the true Gospel of Jesus Christ and have enough discernment to know when you are being deceived.
