Today’s Mitchell Daily Republic reports on the result of a South Dakota poll regarding abortion, at the top of the front-page:
Even though an effort to restrict abortions failed during this year’s South Dakota legislative session, a new Daily Republic poll shows 52-percent support for the restrictions contained in the bill.
The poll, conducted Saturday and Sunday by Zogby International, was based on phone interviews with 501 people selected at random from around the state.
The 52 percent support on the ban broke down this way:
“Strong” supporters of the restriction accounted for 36.2 percent of those polled, while 15.5 percent said they “somewhat” supported the restriction. When taken together, those two groups account for 52 percent of the people interviewed.
As 52 percent supported the ban, only 43 percent opposed it:
Opponents of the abortion restrictions accounted for 43 percent of those polled - 28.3 percent said they were strongly opposed to the restrictions, and 14.6 percent said they were somewhat opposed.
Five percent of those interviewed said they were “not sure” what their opinion was.
Kate Looby, State Director of Planned Parenthood Minnesota/ South Dakota said this in a letter to the editor in yesterday’s Daily Republic:
I have had the opportunity to speak with many South Dakotans about abortion during the legislative session. Some supported HB1191, most did not, but all agreed that more must be done to make abortion rare in South Dakota.
Emphasis added
Looby’s lack of comprehension of realty continued in today’s report:
Kate Looby, director of South Dakota Planned Parenthood, lobbied against the abortion-restriction legislation. She said more people in the poll would have voiced opposition if they had known there were no exceptions for rape or incest in the bill.
“I think these numbers reflect how divided our state and nation are on this issue,” Looby said. “We at Planned Parenthood know the values of mainstream South Dakotans are not consistent with the criminalizing of all abortions, particularly in cases of rape and incest.”
Yesterday Looby said most did not support the ban, but today we are divided. What Looby also fails to understand is that making an exception for rape and incest violates the constitution’s equal protection clause. Funny how one of her main arguments, during the legislature, was the constitutionality. Further, the report stated that, “Poll subjects were asked if they supported the restriction on abortion as proposed by the bill.” Emphasis added
Recent Comments