Joseph Farah provides this admission from Hillary Clinton:
Hillary Clinton says she doesn't really like the descriptive "liberal," preferring to be characterized as a "progressive."
"You know, it (liberal) is a word that originally meant that you were for freedom … that you were willing to stand against big power and on behalf of the individual," she said at the CNN/YouTube debate. "Unfortunately, in the last 30, 40 years, it has been turned up on its head, and it's been made to seem as though it is a word that describes big government, totally contrary to what its meaning was in the 19th and early 20th century."
She continued: "I prefer the word 'progressive,' which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. I consider myself a modern progressive."
Farah explains how the false prophets who are leading the Democrat Party are using the flowery label of "Progressive" to hide their true agenda:
Yet, what no one else has observed with regard to this quote is what it actually reveals about Hillary.
It relates directly to Hillary's political roots and her recently released Wellesley thesis on her radical hero Saul Alinsky.
While Hillary may defend liberalism today, I don't think she ever considered herself one. Having some first-hand familiarity with the "New Left" of which Hillary was a part in the 1960s, I can tell you the radicals of that movement had no use for liberals.
Liberals were sellouts to them. Liberals were at best "useful idiots." Liberals were people who could not be found when the going got tough.
That's the way Hillary and her hero Saul Alinsky viewed liberals. It was the same way the Old Left – the Communist Party – viewed liberals.
Hillary quoted Alinsky in her thesis as explaining the difference between a liberal and a radical: "The liberal refuses to fight for the goals he professes."
I'm sure Hillary still sees herself today as a "radical." But she could never use that term and remain a viable politician. So she has adopted another term – "progressive" – which means the same thing to those in the know.
This is the favored term even today of the Communist Party. They don't call themselves liberals, either. They call themselves "progressives." They always have. Nothing has changed.
In fact, who were the leaders of the Progressive Movement of the early 19th century with whom Hillary so closely identifies? Among the most notable leaders were W.E.B. DuBois, a Communist Party member, and Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood and an advocate of racial eugenics, an idea that inspired Adolf Hitler to kill six million Jews.
I don't exaggerate. These are people and ideas that get Hillary's adrenalin pumping.
Just another post to add to my "Communists not liberals" category. And if Todd Epp doesn’t like it, then he needs to change his allegiances. There is nothing progressive about abandoning America’s traditional principles. And to be fair, there are those in the Republican Party who also agree with the left and also have abandoned traditional American principles. These people are mislabeled as "moderates". There is nothing moderate about abandoning America’s traditional principles. There is no better time than now to restore America. Somehow the American people must understand that electing the one who raises the most money is not always in our best interests.
Recent Comments