She just needs to sound like the sane, competent, serious leader that America and the free world need. Clinton checks those boxes, while the alternative goes on this bully rant:
Donald Trump, after hearing speeches at the Democratic convention this week, said Thursday he wanted to “hit a number of those speakers so hard, their heads would spin.”
“They’d never recover,” he said.
Trump often uses the term “hit” to mean verbally attack, rather than physical contact.
But in an earlier post, Cory uses the word "hit" himself:
This is a complicated and uncertain world we live in. The threats are too great. The times are too uncertain, to elect Donald Trump as President of the United States, now let me finish. No major party, no major party nominee in the history of this nation has ever known less has been less prepared to deal with our national security.
We cannot elect a man who exploits are fears of ISIS and other terrorists.
So again we have Cory being a hypocrite. He is also helping the Democrats use false propaganda in order to support Islamic fascism. Note Bidens use of the word "fears" regarding Trump's policy position on ISIS. Hillary also "hit" on that point last night:
He's taken the Republican Party a long way...from "Morning in America" to "Midnight in America." He wants us to fear the future and fear each other. Well, a great Democratic President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, came up with the perfect rebuke to Trump more than eighty years ago, during a much more perilous time. "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." Now we are clear-eyed about what our country is up against. But we are not afraid. We will rise to the challenge, just as we always have. We will not build a wall. Instead, we will build an economy where everyone who wants a good paying job can get one. And we'll build a path to citizenship for millions of immigrants who are already contributing to our economy!
Over 127,000 United States citizens were imprisoned during World War II. Their crime? Being of Japanese ancestry.
Despite the lack of any concrete evidence, Japanese Americans were suspected of remaining loyal to their ancestral land. Anti-Japanese paranoia increased because of a large Japanese presence on the West Coast. In the event of a Japanese invasion of the American mainland, Japanese Americans were feared as a security risk.
Succumbing to bad advice and popular opinion, President Roosevelt signed an executive order in February 1942 ordering the relocation of all Americans of Japanese ancestry to concentration camps in the interior of the United States.
Evacuation orders were posted in Japanese-American communities giving instructions on how to comply with the executive order. Many families sold their homes, their stores, and most of their assets. They could not be certain their homes and livelihoods would still be there upon their return. Because of the mad rush to sell, properties and inventories were often sold at a fraction of their true value.
So we have Hillary and the Democrats misusing American history in order to protect their position that is in support of Islamic fascism. The Democratic beloved great president took strong action in dealing with a national security risk. Today, the Democratic leadership is allowing our enemy to wreck havoc in our communities and then use those actions to spread fear of guns in order to disarm us. And they are even resorting to the use of false propaganda, through the misuse of American history, to attack those who disagree with them and want to stand strong for America.
In addition, the Democrats are saying that diversity will allow us to work together. If that was true, then Cory would not ban me from his web site in order to discuss possible solutions to the issues he brings forward. I seem to get into the way of their deceptive fear mongering of white male patriotic Christian conservative Republicans. Are we the ones meant for the concentration camps Obama has built?
Cory Heidelberger and his herd of indoctrinated Neo-Marxists are reacting to Trump's foreign policy positions with this:
President Bill Clinton laid out the surest way to beat ISIS in his speech last night: “If you’re a Muslim and you love America and freedom and you hate terror, stay here and help us win and make a future together. We want you.”
Cory and Bill Clinton are 100% wrong. ISIS needs a means to infiltrate American borders, and Clinton's policy provides that. As I will discuss later in this post, the Clintons are part of the global economic and power elite. In order for them to get America to go along with global governance, America can no longer be great. The Muslim Brotherhood, in concert with the Black Lives Matter movement, could help bring about that destruction of America the great. Cory is too much of a partisan to see that as a possibility. Nor is such discussion welcome on his so-called Dakota Free Press.
As Cory supports Islamic fascism by accusing the opposition of promoting fear, he is himself promoting fear of Russians:
“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Mr. Trump’s call was an extraordinary moment at a time when Russia is being accused of meddling in the U.S. presidential election. His comments came amid questions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s computer servers, which researchers have concluded was likely the work of two Russian intelligence agencies [Ashley Parker, “Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails,” New York Times, 2016.07.27].
Pageant-manager Trump should stick with stage design and reality-show insults. Trump’s foreign policy utterances are daft and dangerous.
The false flag approach (do something bad and blame it on the enemy) is nothing new for professional propagandists. Here is some reality regarding Russia and cyber attacks:
Of course, whether or not you believe that may depend on how credible you find the big cybersecurity firms like CrowdStrike, FireEye and Mandiant (the big names that always pop up in situations like this). For what it's worth, these guys have something of a vested interest in playing up the threat of big hacks from nation-state level hackers. For a good analysis of why this finger-pointing may be less than credible, I recommend two articles by Jeffrey Carr, one noting that these firms come from a history of "faith-based attribution" whereby they are never held accountable for being wrong -- and another highlighting serious questions about the designation of Russia as being responsible for this particular hack (he notes that some of the research appeared to come pre-arrived at that conclusion, and then ignored any evidence to the contrary).
Still, the claim that the data came from the Russians has become something of a story itself. And, of course, who did the hack and got the info is absolutely a news story. But it's an entirely separate one from whether or not the leaked emails contain anything useful or newsworthy. And yet, because this is the peak of political silly season, some are freaking out and claiming that anyone reporting on these emails "has been played" by Putin and Russia. Leaving aside the fact that people like to claim that Russia's behind all sorts of politicians that some don't like, that should be entirely unrelated to whether or not the story is worth covering.
And yet, we already have stories arguing that "Putin weaponized Wikileaks to influence" the US election. That's ridiculous on multiple levels.Wikileaks releases all kinds of stuff, whether you agree with them or not. And the idea that this will actually impact the election seems... unlikely. Is the (not at all surprising) fact that the DNC is fully of cronyism and favoritism really suddenly going to shift voters to Trump? Of course, Wikileaks implicitly threatening someone with legal action for saying there's a connection between Russia and Wikileaks is pretty ridiculous as well.
The media is now reporting on the unproven myth, creating by the false flag propaganda, that Russia is supporting Trump in order to change the subject from the issue of the Democratic leadership undermining Bernie Sanders in order to get their global crony capitalist into the White House. This shows again how the media is working for the economic elite. Republicans need to discard the notion that "capitalism" is "conservative". Today's capitalism is an implementation of liberal corporate capitalism, which has replaced a free market with an "administered" market via a partnership between big government and the private business sector.
If the Democrats are truly concerned about foreign influence on American elections, then they should note this:
For over 14 years, Daniel Estulin has investigated and researched the Bilderberg Group’s far-reaching influence on business and finance, global politics, war and peace, and control of the world’s resources and its money.
His book, “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” was published in 2005 and is now updated in a new 2009 edition. He states that in 1954, “the most powerful men in the world met for the first time” in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, “debated the future of the world,” and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a who’s who of world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media figures, and invited others – some quietly by some accounts like Barack Obama and many of his top officials.
Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB’s Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England’s Mervyn King.
As you see, the Democrats (specifically the Clintons, that is why Hilary was Secretary of State) are part of the agenda whereby the world's power elites influence our elections. And so are some of the Republican Establishment. Cory cannot allow his readers to understand that the Establishments of both parties are covertly working together. That might cause them to pause in their hate fest for a moment.
And Cory's faith in NATO is daft and dangerous:
Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided “to create an ‘Aristocracy of purpose’ between Europe and the United States (to reach consensus to rule the world on matters of) policy, economics, and (overall) strategy.” NATO was essential for their plans – to ensure “perpetual war (and) nuclear blackmail” to be used as necessary. Then proceed to loot the planet, achieve fabulous wealth and power, and crush all challengers to keep it.
I have made efforts to provide Cory and his ban of indoctrinated Neo-Marxists with reality, but they can't handle it as the Madville's latest ban on my comments continues at their so-called Dakota Free Press. The truth seems to get into the way of their hate fest, that is fueled by Heidelberger's propaganda.
I would gamely suggest that, given a city-induced Senate vacancy, Governor Daugaard might be just as inclined to pick me for District 3. The Governor knows Al Novstrup has squishily resisted his big remaining policy priority, Medicaid expansion. He knows I’m ready to beat back Republican baloney and support the human, economic, and fiscal benefits of Medicaid expansion at a moment’s notice. The Governor might be inclined to give a Medicaid-expansion backer like me the nod to scare other GOP candidates around the state into toeing his line on his policy priorities.
Yesterday, I exposed Cory's racist comment regarding Trump because he is "pale". After banning me from commenting for about the third time, there is little doubt that Cory would go to great lengths to "scare other GOP candidates around the state into toeing his line on his policy priorities". Of course the two do have a lot in common. They both support allowing men going into girl's bathrooms and both are tax and spend liberals. Maybe Cory is onto something, or maybe he is just on something.
Starting yesterday Cory Heidelberger again began deleting my comments. Today they are being blocked. It seems that Cory and the Democrats are nervous about supporting a crony capitalist for president who has the backing of the global economic elites. Cory seems particularly disturbed by my main premise that both parties are controlled by these economic elites. Such bipartisan positions is not welcomed on a blog that wants to use false propaganda to paint Democrats has "intelligent" and Republicans as "wingnuts", racists, and crony capitalists.
We need to deal with illegal aliens that come into the country and it has nothing to do with discrimination…. It doesn’t matter what country they come from if they come here illegally [Rep. Herman Otten, in Ferguson, 2016.07.23].
Translation: I didn’t pay attention to the question or the bills being discussed, so I’m going to talk about an issue that wasn’t addressed by any of the discriminatory bills discussed by Hart, LaPlante, and Saba. I’m just going to rail against immigrants in general, because it’s not discrimination if we fear all immigrants.
More translation, now of Sibby: Whatever Cory posts doesn’t matter; I want to preach my false equivalency and distract everyone from matters of public interest that voters will actually consider. Let’s talk about me, me, me instead!
As I was saying, Hart, LaPlante, and Saba represent Democrats’ willingness to fight discrimination. Budmayr represents the Republican need to distract people from their party’s enmity toward equality. Otten represents general clueless Trumpishness. Would anyone care to comment on those specific distinctions?
My comment that dealt with those specific distinctions was deleted, along with my point that Cory and his readers try to make the discussion about me instead of dealing with the points I bring. My response was that the Democrats are promoting illegal activities, and they also discriminate and promote hatred with their "white privilege" cultural Neo-Marxist propaganda, which Cory used today in covering Michelle Obama's speech from last night:
Cory made a veiled attack on whites with the "Accept no pale imitations."
The Democrats have resorted to promoting a crony capitalist simply because she is a woman and against an anti-establishment candidate simply because he is a white man of privilege. Here is how the Cultural Neo-Marxist agenda began:
Marxism failed to spread to the rest of Europe and the world. The hoped for supporters of the revolution, the allegedly "exploited workers" of the capitalist countries, remained largely indifferent and refused to support the Marxist revolutionaries.
It was at this time around 1920 that several socialist intellectuals in Europe began to rework the theoretical basics of Marx. Naturally they couldn't come to grips with the fact that Marx might have been grossly wrong in his worldview. There had to be some other reason why the revolution had not occurred. That reason was supposedly found by two brilliant Marxist theoreticians, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary. They posited that Western civilization, built as it was on the Judeo-Christian religion, had instilled evil values into man — values of individualism, personal industry, family solidarity, monogamy, private property, patriotism, belief in a Creator God, etc. These values had brainwashed the workers of the world, which kept them from realizing their true destiny, which was to revolt and usher in a classless society. Gramsci and Lukacs insisted that the glorious socialist revolution would be impossible until these Judeo-Christian values had been destroyed. Then the workers would rise up and complete the vision of Marx.
The Obamas' and Cory's agenda is certainly not about "family values" and not about a "belief in the greatness of America". Instead it is about destroying America, and there is where Trump supporters come in. I am surprised by how many have come to see the reality of what has happened to America. What most still do not understand is how the "globalists" control both of the two political parties. And in addition, the globalists are destroying America by hijacking the schools, both public and private:
It’s the sleeper issue of the 2008 campaign-the assault on American sovereignty. Will America remain an independent nation? Or will we lose our identity because of policies of “open borders” and transnationalism which transform us into mere residents of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s “global village?”
Our media have made their decision. In fact, a recent Time article gives our young people their marching orders: “Kids are global citizens now, even in small-town America, and they must learn to act that way.”
If President Bush is to have a worthwhile legacy, he must stand in the way of this insidious process, even at this late date in his presidency. For our part, in domestic and foreign affairs, we must continue acting like Americans-and we must insist that our leaders protect America’s borders, national identity, and national language, English.
Personally, we must teach our young people that America, a unique and unprecedented experiment in human freedom and self-government, must not only survive but prosper and expand.
Yet the Time article, “How to Bring Our Schools Out of the 20th Century,” argues that the solution to all of our problems is “global education” so students can compete in the “global economy” and become “global citizens.” This spells America’s doom.
The Time article makes it clear that, in the Brave New World of global education, the Founding Fathers have been replaced with British and French thinkers, 9/11 conspiracy theories have replaced facts about the global Islamic threat, and U.S. History has taken a backseat to World History. Students are being taught to think across borders, be sensitive to other cultures, and learn foreign languages. The new role for educators is to eradicate American nationalism.
And in South Dakota, the two political parties combined forces to increase taxes that funds that education system. It is through the so-called "social justice" agenda that the cultural Neo-Marxism is being indoctrinated into the heads of the kids. The purpose is to destroy America, but ironically, that is also the same agenda sought by the global crony capitalist elites. How can that be?
Before the globalist can have their way, America has to be destroyed or else we will refuse to join the one-world system. So for the time being, they are allowing the Marxists to push their agenda.
The globalists want Hillary and hate Trump, just like Cory. But Cory does not want his readers to know that the global crony capitalist are behind Hillary. And he does not want his readers to know that illegal immigration is what the globalists want in order to destroy America and have access to cheap labor. So he has decided to ban my comments yet again.
I really feel bad for Cory. He seems to want to do the right thing, but he insists it has to be done with an agenda that will yield the exact opposite of what it promises, which is one who lacks wisdom and discernment. The idea to take back big government from big business by implementing more big government is not working and instead is playing right into the hands of the so-called "One Percenters". My efforts to make him and his readers understand that have not been welcomed. This is why I believe that the problems cannot be fixed politically, regardless who should get elected. Instead we must await the second coming of Jesus Christ. Until then, we must spread His Gospel.
Recent Comments