Sibby Online

Cory Heidelberger uses a false equivalency to trash Christians, when he should be looking into the mirror and see an active member of the Leftist-Islamist Alliance

Dakota Fake Press puts up a post on California's travel ban:

San Francisco decided in March to stop spending tax dollars on city employee travel to South Dakota in response to our anti-LGBT discriminatory adoption law (Senate Bill 149, which goes into effect next Saturday).

Now California follows suit, adding South Dakota, Alabama, Kentucky, and Texas to a list of anti-equality states to which state-funded and state-sponsored travel is now illegal

A comment challenged Cory's position:

“The state may not discriminate or take any adverse action against a child-placement agency or an organization seeking to become a child-placement agency on the basis, wholly or partly, that the child-placement agency has declined or will decline to provide any service that conflicts with, or provide any service under circumstances that conflict with the agency’s written sincerely-held religious belief or moral conviction of the child-placement agency.”

It might be smart to actually read the bill before declaring it discriminatory. . . If anything it appears to be the opposite: http://sdlegislature.gov/legislative_session/bills/Bill.aspx?File=SB149ENR.htm&Session=2017

Cory responds:

OldSarg, a sure way to grind my gears is to accuse me of not reading something that I have read thoroughly. The passage you cite, from Section 4 of SB 149, is exactly the passage I cited in the broader pro-religious-discrimination bill that Rep. Rev. Scott Craig floated in 2016.

Say what you want about my arguments. But don’t falsely accuse me of arguing from ignorance. I know full well what the law says, and it says adoption agencies may cloak their discrimination against gays, atheists, Jews, Muslims, liberal Lutherans, single moms, fornicators, and anyone else they don’t like in state-protected “free exercise of religious beliefs.” It’s the Christian brand of Sharia that these same people fear Muslims would impose if they fielded an electoral majority.

Comparing this law to Sharia law is far worse than arguing from ignorance. South Dakota did not ban homosexuals. It did not ban them from adopting children. Here is what Sharia Law would do:

In the wake of America's deadliest mass shooting ever — at a gay nightclub in Orlando on Sunday — we have updated our map of LGBT rights around the world.

Hover over the countries below to see which category each falls into.

Below the map, we take a closer look at the 10 countries in which homosexuality can be punishable by death. In some, the sentencing derives from an interpretation of sharia law.

Saudi Arabia: Under the country’s interpretation of sharia law, a married man engaging in sodomy or any non-Muslim who commits sodomy with a Muslim can be stoned to death. All sex outside of marriage is illegal.

Somalia: The penal code stipulates prison, but in some southern regions, Islamic courts have imposed sharia law and the death penalty.

To equate laws protecting religious rights with Sharia Law is just plain obscene, and is a true example of a false equivalency. Cory's agenda is to destroy Western Culture and Christianity under the guise of multiculturalism, which is straight out of the Frankfurt School:

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for licence cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas – possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’

So there is where we find the foundation to Cory Heidelberger's leftist worldview. And the left is using some of the above recommendations to join forces with the Islamists:

The worrisome thing is, our educational system, along with other institutions of cultural formation, seems to be on course to creating a whole nation of pod people—people with little attachment to their country or countrymen.

This detachment can take three forms. In some cases, individuals turn away from involvement in their culture to self-absorption. To assuage the loneliness of the unconnected self, they might turn to drugs or pornography or serial sex. Except for the world of pop entertainment, they are unconscious of the larger world. Like the clueless young people interviewed on the Watters’ World segment of the O’Reilly Factor, they might be unsure who the first president was, in which century the Civil War was fought, or who John Kerry is. None of that seems important to them. If a group of bearded men wearing long robes and speaking Arabic moved into the apartment above, they’d probably think, “that’s cool” and light up another joint.

The second form that the detachment takes is a transfer of allegiance from one’s own history and culture to a neo-Marxist perspective. Thanks in large part to our educational system, a growing segment of our population has come to look upon its own culture as the root of all the world’s evils. Unlike the self-absorbed detachers, they are politically engaged, but their political aims have to do with undermining traditional society and radically transforming it. The “Occupy Wall Street” movement is representative of this group.

The third group, the one that Prime Minister Cameron is primarily concerned about, is composed of those whose first loyalty is to the ummah—the worldwide community of Muslim believers. They may live in the UK, France, or the U.S., but their allegiance lies elsewhere. They may have always felt this way, or they may have undergone a conversion. The majority in this category pose no direct threat to the larger society; they simply prefer to lead their lives separate from it. These separate communities do, however, provide the soil in which the radicals take root. They are, to use another metaphor, the sea in which the jihadis swim. The radical Muslims themselves are in some ways similar to the anti-Western Westerners who repudiate the Western tradition. The radicals not only reject Western culture, they see it as evil and they want to bring it down.

Because they have the same goals—the destruction of Western and Christian civilization—the members of the second group often act as enablers of Muslim radicals. I’ve written before about the leftist-Islamist alliance—the leftist professors who support the cause of Hamas, the left-leaning foundations which finance the “Islamophobia” campaign, and the left-leaning politicians who support the Muslim Brotherhood. But sometimes the alliance goes beyond moral and financial support and manifests itself in actual violence. The best example of this are the antifa or “antifascist” gangs in Europe who use brownshirt tactics to suppress any protest against Islamization or the leftist policies—such as mass immigration—which promote Islamization. Numerous anti-Islamization rallies and marches in Europe have been broken up by much larger groups of young antifas throwing punches and sometimes bricks and bottles.

And this certainly does apply to Cory Heidelberger:

So if you’re worried about the advance of global jihad, it’s not just the young Muslim browsing radical sites on the Internet that you need to worry about. You also have to worry about all those college grads who majored in Marxism and Peace Studies, and are dead set on ridding the world of “racists” and “fascists.”

A quick read of Dakota Fake News is clear proof of the above analysis. Cory Heidelbeger is in bed with the Islamofascists. For different reasons, they want to destroy Western Culture and Christianity. And Cory is helping direct the invasion of South Dakota by the Muslim Brotherhood's Islamic Jihad.

 

Dakota Fake News incorrect use of the false equivalencey stick to deny the truth plays right into the hands of the wealthy ruling elite

Cory Heidelberger banned me from his web site after accusing me of arguing a false equivalency. I said that the establishments of both parties deep down inside favor illegal immigration. After Cory ended a typical partisan post with, "Democrats offer intelligent discourse; Republicans offer fearful distraction." I responded:

Democrats offer promotion of illegal activities; Republicans offer lies.

The cronies that run the SDGOP want illegal immigrants because they provide cheap labor. Both party establishments are unofficially on the same page.

Saying that both sides are wrong on illegal immigration, but for different reasons, really pissed off Cory:

More translation, now of Sibby: Whatever Cory posts doesn’t matter; I want to preach my false equivalency and distract everyone from matters of public interest that voters will actually consider. Let’s talk about me, me, me instead!

Just last week Cory used the same false equivalency against Rep. Noem for saying that lying politician on both sides have caused the general public to distrust the whole political process in DC:

Once again, we must reject the false equivalency to which apologists for the worst president ever resort when they can muster no logical defense of Trump’s words and actions. Sure we can find false statements made by Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, John F. Kennedy, and other occupants of the White House. But I challenge Congresswoman Noem to identify any other White House that has lied with either the rate or brazenness of Donald Trump.

I would suppose Cory would call " I did not have sex with that women" as a false equivalency to Trump's lies and groping women, as partisan Democrats argued that it is normal for men to have affairs...in order to avoid holding Bill Clinton accountable. So why would Cory say this:

Everybody else did it does not excuse us from holding accountable the people who are doing it now. Congresswoman Noem, grow a conscience, and hold Donald Trump accountable for his unpresidential lies.

Cory is using false equivalency fraudulently in order to avoid dealing with the possibility that both sides can be wrong, but for different reasons. The liberal Washington Post even sees that as a problem:

Lately I’ve enjoyed drawing comparisons between otherwise dissimilar politicos, and every time I get the same response. Back in June I wrote a little piece comparing and contrasting the falsehoods uttered by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton; both, in my view, had a marked habit of intentionally misleading, but in very different ways and for different reasons. A little later I wrote something suggesting that Trump and Barack Obama, for all their obvious differences, both tend to underestimate the competence of their adversaries. In another piece I contended that the effects of (actual) fake news and those of genuine news stories with substantial misstatements and misinterpretations can be similarly adverse.

And last week in The Post I tried to draw out the similarities between Trump’s inaugural address and Obama’s of 2009. Clearly these are very different men with very different aims — is that even necessary to say? — but surely it’s at least mildly interesting that both these addresses exhibited some common tendencies.

After all of these pieces, I was subjected to a barrage of tweets and emails and blog posts and letters to the editor accusing me of perpetrating “false equivalence.” This despite the fact that in each instance I’d gone out of my way not to equate the two sides of the comparison.

And...

Now, however, the term is used mainly — at least in politics — as a stick with which to beat anyone who implies, or even hints at implying, that one person or phenomenon might share certain qualities with another. Suggest that two political adversaries aren’t as different as everyone’s assuming, and prepare for an army of mostly anonymous Twitter users calling you a moron for engaging in — fancy term — false equivalence.

And...

Many people on the left felt that to talk at all about Clinton’s dishonesty was in essence to praise Trump as a man of rock-solid virtue; and many on the right felt that any talk about Trump’s sketchy business dealings or outrageous remarks was by implication an argument for Clinton’s high ethical standards. No matter what you said about one or the other, even if it was indisputably true, someone was there waiting to thrash you with the false-equivalence stick. Of course, it wasn’t false equivalence, because it wasn’t equivalence. It was an ordinary pattern of thought called comparison. You learned how to do it when you were 3 or 4. But in an election year, ordinary thoughts get you in trouble.

Cory's mistake is playing right into the hands of the ruling elite's Divide and Rule tactic:

In order to keep the populace deceived into believing that the ‘theatre of illusion’ world they live in is real it has been necessary for those controlling the show, the world’s ruling elite with their stage con artists, to artfully invent a number of distractions. These distractions are designed to keep the populaces’ focus of attention away from the ruling elite’s deceptions so that they don’t get worked out and become exposed.   

One of the ruling elite’s most effective pieces of distraction woven and spun, socially engineered into the fabric of the fake world for controlling the populace is the divide and rule tactic.

Be it in politics, business, banking, finance, science, religion, race relations, the military, medicine, drugs... etc the divide and rule tactic continues to have a massive controlling effect on a deceived populace as they bicker, argue, take sides and fight amongst each other, never joining the dots, never seeing the bigger picture, never realizing how they’re being played by distraction...

 -In the divide and rule clash of viewpoints a number of common patterns recur:

1. All sides each with their conflicting views and ideals... have been secretly manufactured or funded and controlled by the ruling elite. In effect, the ruling elite are the invisible 3^rd party in the conflicts.

2. Thus, no side is the one that’s ‘got it right.’

3. ...or has the ‘truth.’

4. No side offers anything of real intrinsic value.

5. No side will ever win. The Hegelian dialectic conflict will continue here on out. Even if it morphs into a different dialectic the same old conflicts will occur.

6. The destabilizing weakening ‘us’ versus ‘them’ scenario prevents those divided and ruled from realizing just how powerful they could be together. How together they could topple those puppet masters at the top of the hierarchical tree...

And...

Be it concerning political, financial, ethnic, educational or other matters the western world powers that be want you to take sides through their simplistic reduction of "liberal" versus "conservative." issues...

This age old political stratagem has the effect of creating divided people fighting against each other instead of turning against their oppressors, the ruling elite.

So Cory Heidelberger's partisan extremism has caused him to use the false equivalency stick against those who are trying to bring people together in order to implement solutions to our problems. He refuses to consider the possibility that we have false dichotomies, preventing us from seeing that both sides could be wrong. That mistake ends up benefiting the other side that he so vehemently hates...the ultra-wealthy ruling elite who currently control both parties and thereby all of the ardent followers of both parties. That is not a false equivalency, because that is the truth. A true false equivalency would be Cory calling counter terrorism experts hate promoting Islamophobes for exposing the true agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood. A true Islamophobe are the liberals who want to appease Jihadism because they are afraid to piss them off.

 

Dakota Fake Press uses Stand Up Comic to promote the Muslim Brotherhood's Islamofascist anti-truth propaganda

Interesting that Cory Heidelberger would use a Stand Up Comic to mock two counter terrorism experts:

The “Americans First, Task Force” publicizes this photo from their crypto-Klan meeting Friday night in Aberdeen (absent, alas, their big foam mascot, Mr. Superfluous Comma… which perhaps symbolizes the hidden Commanist threat among us):

Anti-Muslim speakers (in suit jackets, at center) Chris Gaubatz (center left) and John Guandolo (center right), Aberdeen, SD, 2017.06.16.

What? Did Ed Randazzo (fourth from left?) and Amy Willson (second from right?) drive all the way to Aberdeen just to hear Guandolo and Gaubatz again?

Roving correspondent Spencer Dobson writes this account (with my added links) of what those people saw and heard to reinforce their own paranoid conspiracy theories…

What Cory doesn't point out is his so-called correspondent is a Stand Up Comic who does not get very good reviews:

His setups have a tendency to be long-winded and the punchline doesn't always pack a laugh proportionate to the time it took getting there. Don't get me wrong; I don't have anything against lengthy anecdotes or setups. Comedians like Bill Cosby and Dylan Brody are great examples of people who excel in the storytelling process by keeping us laughing throughout the entire journey. Dobson's approach lacks the laughs to keep us hooked throughout the entire narrative.

Here is and excerpt from Dobson's satire:

The basic premise of  “Understanding the Threat” is that since the early 90’s the Muslim Brotherhood has been infiltrating the US government at all levels and these patriotic super sleuths, John Guandolo and Chris Gaubatz have used their FBI training and the ability to go under cover have uncovered the horrible horrible truth. And of course, only they really, really, really, really, know what’s going on.

Dobson tries to get cute and portray the entire presentation as some kind of conspiracy:

The presentation consists of document after document after document with words like “Hamas” and “Muslim Brotherhood”. Then there is a bunch of documents with long lists of names. So many names. Gaubatz and Guandolo go through the lists and circle names.  And these names aren’t normal  names like “Fred” or “Axle” or “Cher”. These names are crazy like “Omar” and “Muhammad”. So clearly, there is a huge conspiracy that has infiltrated the US Government to it’s highest levels. Look at all those names they’ve circled. It’s a lot of names. So, you know, conspiracy.

Yes, we do have a conspiracy, but not in theory. This is real:

After feigning conversion to Islam at Northern Virginia’s Dar Al-Hijrah mosque and spending several weeks learning how to live as a “Sharia-compliant Muslim,” Chris Gaubatz spent six months working undercover as an intern with the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).

During an interview on “The Alex Nitzberg Show,” he explained that CAIR holds seminars that train Muslims to cultivate relationships with the media so that they will turn to these Muslims for comment “…after a terrorist attack or after something happens that negatively affects Islam…” They teach attendees “to respond to these attacks” in a way that portrays Islam in “a positive light.”

Gaubatz refers to this as CAIR’s “information campaign” and explains that following terror attacks CAIR utilizes its media contacts to propagate the narrative “that this has nothing to do with Islam.”

“The real narrative is that this has everything to do with Islam,” he asserted.

According to Gaubatz, CAIR uses “interfaith dialogue” to propagate their narrative and “CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood groups” purposely “get closer to the law enforcement” after terror attacks by offering “sensitivity training” and volunteering to serve as a “liaison” between police and Muslim communities.

“Their whole purpose with this narrative war is to shut the discussion down because if you can shut the discussion down…and distance Islam from any part of the problem, then the people that are charged with protecting citizens are always looking elsewhere for the problem…and the problem is, and always has, been rooted right in Islam and right in the Sharia, they’re intertwined.”

The media’s reporting on CAIR borders on “material support of terrorism,” according to Gaubatz, because reporters regurgitate CAIR’s description of itself as a Muslim civil rights organization without noting CAIR’s connection with Hamas as demonstrated in the Holy Land Foundation trial.

“They don’t even do two seconds of basic research on their own which would show that CAIR is a Hamas organization and has the agenda of Hamas, never giving any kind of balance to any of their stories with very few exceptions,” Gaubatz stated.

While he partially attributes this to reporters’ laziness, Gaubatz also believes the issue is related to the “red-green axis,” the paradoxical alliance between “hard-left Marxist, socialist groups,” (red) and “jihadis” (green) “working together” despite their significant differences because of their shared revolutionary ambitions to radically reshape America. Gaubatz said that some of the staunchest socialist/Marxist radicals are the administrators, teachers and students within university journalism departments.

So this is what Neo-Marxist Cory Heidelberger don't want South Dakotans to know, and is using Muslim Brotherhood's tactics to shut down discussion of the truth, which includes personal attacks on out spoken counter terrorism experts. He is in bed with the Islamofascists in order to implement "their shared revolutionary ambitions to radically reshape America", and Cory's focus is on radically reshaping South Dakota. His latest tactic is to use a Stand Up Comic to mock a couple of counter terrorism experts who are out to warn South Dakotans about the real agenda behind Muslim immigration...civilizational jihad:

Violent jihad is easy to identify and obvious in the danger it presents.

Civilization Jihad is by its nature and design a more subtle, but truly more dangerous threat in the long run. It aims to transform a society from within so it can eventually be brought under Islamic law.

Since the goal is the overthrow of the society and its existing government and laws, Civilization Jihad can be a “pre-violent” preparation for violent jihad or if successful enough achieve the desired end on its own.

Stay tune, I have more research coming on this issue as South Dakota is being converted into a land that follows Sharia law.

Dakota Fake Press needs to decide to support Gay Pride and women rights, or the Muslim Brotherhood's Jihad. Only a fool would do both.

Cory Heidelberger has been using his so-called Dakota Free Press web site to mislead his readers by using Muslim Brotherhood's propaganda. Here is his latest false allegations:

Anti-Muslim fearmonger organization “Act for America” is bringing another team of hucksters to whip South Dakotans into fear and donations. With the help of the Family Heritage Alliance, AfA is hosting self-professed jihad experts John Guandolo and Chris Gaubatz to present “Understanding the Threat” (that’s the name of these consultants’ website, too)—i.e., the “Global Islamic Movement” that’s coming to kill us all.

And...

Guandolo had to resign from the FBI after jeopardizing an investigation by boinking an informant. That dalliance was one of many extramarital affairs documented by Guandolo, including trysts with female colleagues at the FBI. It’s a good thing Amy Willson’s church and Family Heritage Alliance are so forgiving of sexual sin.

Well Cory, that is what is called tolerance. This is what an intolerant unforgiving atheist says:

Funny to see this particular God crowd let an adulterer lecture them about threats to Christian decency.

What Dakota Fake Press does not want its readers to know is that ACT for America is also working with a gay man who promotes women's rights:

Saturday's nationwide "March Against Sharia," sponsored by a group known for aggressively criticizing Islam, has in recent days become a rallying cause for right-wing extremists, forcing march organizers to repudiate some of their own supporters and prompting concern about clashes with militant leftists.

The marches, due to be held in at least 19 states, are being coordinated by ACT for America, a conservative grass-roots organization that calls itself "the NRA of national security." The group has a long history of opposing Sharia, which is a legal or philosophical code derived from Islamic scripture and meant to guide the behavior of observant Muslims.

ACT for America organizers say an adherence to Sharia among Muslims leads to abuses against women, from discrimination to honor killings.

The national coordinator of the marches, Scott Presler, is a 29-year-old Republican operative who says he, as a gay man, was first motivated to fight Muslim extremism after the deadly Orlando, Fla., shooting last June.

The target in Orlando was a gay nightclub, and the perpetrator allegedly pledged loyalty to ISIS. To Presler, it highlighted a problem of anti-gay bigotry in orthodox Islam.

And...

Among those who answered Presler's call is Denise Zamora. She offered to organize a march in San Bernardino, Calif., at the site of the 2015 mass shooting carried out by a Pakistani-American and his wife.

"I wasn't even familiar with anything about Sharia law," she told NPR. "I didn't know much about radical Muslims or jihad. I wasn't educated. So I started learning about everything, and when ACT for America announced they were going to do a nationwide march, I quickly volunteered."

Zamora, whose political activism began with her involvement in the Trump presidential campaign, says the San Bernardino rally, like others across the country, will highlight the problem of female genital mutilation. The practice is common in some conservative Muslim societies, but many Islamic scholars insist it is not mandated under Sharia.

Presler hopes the marches will attract broad participation. "These are things that all women should support," he said.

That piece of information, which about those who are concerned about Sharia Law, was from NPR and not some right-wing xenophobic pro-Trump web site.

So Lora confronts Cory with this:

Cory, why do you frustrate the Muslims by not believing them? They tell you the world must submit to Islam or be taxed or killed…they tell you women are property….they tell you Shariah law supersedes our laws….they tell you honor killing is done by the devout….they tell you anyone who isn’t a Muslim is an infidel….they tell you deceiving a host country is fine because is a first step in jihad….and yet you don’t believe them?

Cory's response:

Lora, I do believe that some Muslims believe some of the things you ascribe to them as a whole. I vigorously oppose any effort such people would make to impose their religion on me by public means, to write their religion into favored status in our laws, to oppress or kill their own female relatives, or to spread lies to spread their political agenda.

Dang: when I put it that way, short of the killing, the concerns you raise sound like concerns I could raise about Big Horn Ministries, the GOP, and the other Christianist sponsors of this adulterer’s dog-and-pony show. Care to join in me in reaffirming our commitment to truth and the separation of church and state?

Wow, Cory is all over the map. Cory opposes Christians who say he is wrong at the ballot box, but he supports Islamists who may just cut off his head for disagreeing with them. He is also making himself into a useful idiot for the Muslim Brotherhood by helping them spread their lies and propaganda in order to counter those who are trying to warn South Dakota about the Muslim Brotherhood's political agenda. It is a false allegation to call that racism, bigotry, or what the Muslim Brotherhood calls Islamophobes. According to Christopher Hitchins Islamophobia, "Is a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons." 

If Cory was committed to the truth he would allow us to freely challenge his posts, instead of banning those of us who are concerned about having a truthful discussion about important issues. Instead of discussing the Islamic issue rationally, Cory has decided to make this a personal attack on those he disagrees with. That is something he has in common with the Islamists. That is not a healthy fit for the democratic process of America, and instead s more correctly called Islamic fascism. And here is where I point out that Cory once taught French:

The French release of German-language bestseller Islamic Fascism has been cancelled because its French publisher was worried the book could empower the far right. Hamed Abdel-Samad said he could understand the decision if it were just based on security fears, but the author blasted publisher Piranha’s reasoning as “moral blackmail”.

Mr. Abdel-Samad’s book draws parallels between fascist and Islamist ideology, the Muslim Brotherhood, and goes back to the roots of the Quran. Its author, the son of an imam and former Muslim Brotherhood member, has become a critic of Islam.

 

Regularly featured in the German media, the Egypt-born writer lives under police protection following fatwas for heresy and death threats from jihadists.

And...

Mr. Abdel-Samad admitted to being furious with Piranha’s “far right” justification. The author told Le Point: “Jean-Marc wrote that he didn’t want to bring water to the far right’s mill. 

“That is the typical argument of moral blackmail that I constantly find myself confronted with. I am a free thinker, who doesn’t call for violence, who doesn’t stigmatise Muslims – on the contrary, I defend them as human beings – but who attacks an ideology I consider violent.

“In Germany, I have the right, more than 200 years after Kant and 230 years after Voltaire, to publish these thoughts without having to be afraid. This is why I am so angry.

“I find it a dangerous way of thinking, particularly from a publishing house which, more than any other profession, ought to be the guarantor of debate and freedom of expression.”

Like the French publisher, Cory's web side is not about debate and freedom of expression, and therefore is not living up to the name, "Dakota Free Press". Cory's web site should more properly be called "Dakota Fake Press" or perhaps "Dakota False Propaganda".

Cory is doing for more harm than good. He is calling a group that allows a gay man to be a part of it...xenophobic and bigoted. This is the exactly the kind of false propaganda the Muslim Brotherhood needs to cover its political agenda, which is to implement an Islamic theocracy based on Sharia Law on a global basis (which includes not only America, but also South Dakota). If Cory is against their agenda, then he needs to join those coming to South Dakota to expose their agenda by making a commitment to truth. Sadly, truth is something Cory is afraid of because it will challenge his cultural Neo-Marxist worldview. Instead Cory will use his web site to reinforce his confirmation bias. That is how an atheist can support a movement that opposes most everything he stands for, and thereby become a useful idiot for the Muslim Brotherhood's plan to implement a global theocracy based on Sharia Law.