Last week I said this:
I will start with Herbert Marcuse, one of the creators of Cultural Marxism. Here is his position on the much talked about principle of tolerance used by Heidelberger to justify allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to continue with thei migration agenda here in South Dakota:
In the essay “Repressive Tolerance” (1965), the Germanborn American critical theorist Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979) of the Franklin School [S/B Frankfurt School] of political theorists argued that, under the conditions of advanced industrial capitalism, the only hope for realizing the original objectives of “liberalist” or “pure” toleration (as articulated by the British philosopher John Stuart Mill [1806-1873])— freeing the mind to rationally pursue the truth—was to practice a deliberately selective “liberating tolerance” that both targeted and enacted the repression alluded to in the essay’s paradoxical title (Marcuse 1965, pp. 81, 85, 90). This “liberating tolerance” would involve “the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements” on the Right, and the aggressively partisan promotion of speech, groups, and progressive movements on the Left (pp. 81, 100).
A couple of weeks ago, Heidelberger applauded the Sioux Falls History Club's decision (again in the name of combating white supremacy) to cancel a free speech rally by a critic of Islam.
Cory is part of an orchestrated nationwide movement:
Minutes after author Robert Spencer started to speak, the packed room cleared out.
"You are all little totalitarians and neo-grouchers, a stain on Stanford University and academia in general," Spencer said, directing his attention to students in the audience.It was an orchestrated move by students who opposed Spencer's presence on campus. The university's Young Republicans sponsored the event.
Many students expressed outrage that Spencer, the director of the website Jihad Watch, was invited.
"Racism, bigotry isn't welcome. Those espousing hatred can't have a platform on this campus," said student Jana Kholy.
When asked if he was racist or Islamophobic, Spencer responded with laughter. "I'm neither one. Islam is not a race. Mass murder is not a race."
Though Bruin Hall was nearly empty after the walkout, Spencer supporters weren't allowed in. Organizers insisted that Spencer was invited to create a dialogue.
"This isn't about preaching to the choir," said Amy Lutz of the Young America's Foundation. "It's about educating students on another perspective on the issue."
Here is Robert Spencer's response:
Stanford administration is responsible for what happened tonight, as they aided and abetted the smear campaign that the Stanford Daily and Stanford Review carried out, and coddled the students who were spuriously claiming that they felt “threatened” by my presence. Above all, they are responsible for refusing to enforce their own policy regarding disruption of the event. Even after the fascist students left, they refused to admit others who wanted to get in. What were Stanford officials afraid of? That someone might hear a truth that the elites have deemed unacceptable?
The Stanford administration also barred the Young America’s Foundation from streaming the event. The reason behind that was clear: they didn’t want the behavior of Stanford students to be exposed before the world. They knew what was coming, and they supported it.
If this were a sane academic environment, Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne and Provost Persis Drell would be forced to resign in disgrace for allowing first the smear campaign that preceded my event, and then for allowing it to be disrupted. But this is not a sane academic environment, and Stanford is not in any genuine sense a university.
In The Coming of the Third Reich, historian Richard J. Evans explains how, in the early days of National Socialist Germany, Stormtroopers (Brownshirts) “organized campaigns against unwanted professors in the local newspapers [and] staged mass disruptions of their lectures.” We have seen just that play out at Stanford: a massive and libelous smear campaign in the Stanford student press, and then the disruption of the event itself. Stanford is just an Antifa recruitment center, not a center of learning.
Kind of ironic that it is the radical left that has some kind of phobia as they falsely accuse those they disagree with for being Islamophobes, which is a lie:
There is no such thing as “Islamophobia.” This fact has been proven by sharper minds than mine. People are not so much afraid of Islam and Muslims as they are disgusted with Islam and the silence of Muslim clerics regarding Islamic terrorism. Robert Louis Stevenson’s “thicker than thieves at a fair” sums up the silent trust between the terrorist and the “moderates” who secretly support the terrorist’s jihad. What is really happening today is that the religion of Islam, with its long history of violence and intolerance and egregious cultures, has by this time forfeited the trust of the Western world. This is really the issue at hand. So-called “Islamophobia” is simply a tangential matter that serves merely to distract from the real issue, which is Islam’s teachings of intolerance of other faiths and, as a consequence of those teachings, the Ummah’s complete failure to assimilate into Western societies.
As the anniversary of 9/11 came around again, I was struck by the insanely bold and shameless effort the media put into pretending, all over again, that this grotesque atrocity, this terrorist attack, had nothing to do with the religion of Islam. The “moderates” of Islam — those still purporting that the basic message of Islam is salubrious for mankind — are blaming the most zealous of Islam for misrepresenting this. Conversely, the most zealous of Islam excoriate the “moderates” for misrepresenting the basic theme of Islam, which is, in their view, an extreme, imperialistic vision encompassing all of mankind: mass conversion of Western nations to the religion of Islam, which would necessarily include a transition from a Western style judiciary to a judiciary exclusively of Sharia law. For the Muslim zealot, this mass conversion cannot be accomplished soon enough, or in a peaceful manner.
The common preoccupation of both the “moderate” and the zealous of Islam is their drive for a universal Caliphate; this is not unlike Joseph Stalin’s dark machinations during his terrorist exploits preceding the Bolshevik Revolution: “the human cost was irrelevant, subordinate to its political value.”* We see this happening all around us, every day and every night, and yet the journalist, the politician, and the cleric continue to deny the very existence of Islam’s religious assault on Western norms and values (many of which are Christian and Judaic), while besmirching all opposition to this religious imperialism as the mere noise of brutes and dolts.
Most of the Western world no longer can see any redeeming qualities within a religion whose adherents are more adept at deflecting blame and telling lies than they are at admitting to the glaring and inconvenient truths about their religion. They have failed to pick up on the Western adage articulated by Abraham Lincoln on that September day long ago, which is that “you may fool all of the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”
So it is Cory Heidelberger and his fellow Antifa members who are the fascists and bigots:
Those of us who came to see and hear Robert Spencer’s ideas and were disallowed into the auditorium were shocked and repelled by the actions of Stanford’s self-elected thought police.
This was a demonstration of the most selfish and narrow-minded bigotry – worthy of a fascist state – that has no place in an American academy.
The Stanford faculty who signed the “Letter from faculty and others regarding Robert Spencer” are, in my opinion, sorely misguided by their prejudgments and uninformed attitudes. As someone who has both studied and lived in Islamic countries and who encounters refugees from “Islamic conditions” daily, I encourage these academics to consider their own plea: “For us, this means taking seriously the lived experience of the people most impacted by racism, bigotry, hate speech and xenophobia.”
This “lived experience” perfectly describes the millions of hostage peoples living under “Islamic conditions,” of which Americans are barely aware. The empathy and advocacy for freedom of these Stanford academics, instead of preventing free speech and shared ideas in the academy, should extend to those enslaved by a totalitarian ideology in the form of state-sponsored theocratic oppression.
– James Dinwiddie
Adjunct Professor, Menlo College
Heidelberger's help in establishing a Ne0-Nazi Islamofascist theocracy is South Dakota needs to be exposed. Again, not all Muslims support the Muslim Brotherhood agenda. I informed Cory about that fact a couple of months ago. If he continues to call those who are exposing that agenda as xenophobes and/or Islamophobes, then he is lying, as he continues to ban my comments at his so-called Dakota Free Press. Cory cannot tolerate someone putting a mirror in his face so he can see that he is what he hates.
Cory is meaningless to South Dakota politics, Steve. Maybe you should focus on the shit in your own back yard.
http://www.mitchellrepublic.com/news/local/4360922-consultant-sees-opportunity-mitchells-lake-estimates-8m-city-expense
Posted by: larry kurtz | November 17, 2017 at 08:14 AM
Good goddess, Steve: for someone who claims prayer and redemption are the keys to salvation your obsession with Cory suggests you're failing miserably.
Posted by: larry kurtz | November 17, 2017 at 08:41 AM
Oh, right. You're sucking clicks from DWC because nobody would pay attention to you otherwise. You and the missus got a big Turkey Day planned, Steve?
Posted by: larry kurtz | November 17, 2017 at 12:50 PM
Can't type fast enough?! Another great piece.
I watched a great investigative report by Michelle Malkin: IslamoFAUXbia: The Hoax Crime Epidemic. Robert Spencer is featured, it's worth the watch.
MSM pushes the Islamophobia narrative and it's not true. Muslims think they need to invent hate crimes to defend themselves.
Take time to research how Islamic teachings and LGBT are able to coexist. I found Pride Parades are being stopped in Sweden because they go against the Islam teachings and are offensive to Muslims communities.
I know there are educated people in the gay community. I really hope they do their own research and find what's happening to the European, gay community can and will creep in to the USA.
Posted by: KM | November 17, 2017 at 02:55 PM
Yet Dan Lederman is free to Zionize the South Dakota Republican Party without recrimination: priceless.
Posted by: larry kurtz | November 17, 2017 at 06:00 PM