Liberal Christians sets up the South Dakota Legislature for the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad with their Interfaith propaganda

On Wednesday January 10th, the second day of this year's South Dakota legislative session with be exposed to the Interfaith movement:

Ten years after he was elected statewide leader for the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Rev. David Zellmer returns to his former church and South Dakota’s Capitol next week for Interfaith Day at the Legislature. 

The event  in Pierre is Jan. 10, the second day of the 2018 legislative session. Zellmer, who now lives at Sioux Falls, previously was senior pastor at Lutheran Memorial Church in Pierre. He was chosen as bishop in 2007.

He heads an Interfaith Day group that includes former legislator Stan Adelstein, a Republican from Rapid City;

Betty Oldenkamp, the chief executive for Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota and a former cabinet member for state government; and

Representatives for the Episcopal Church, Catholic Diocese, Benedictine Sisters of Yankton, Muslim Community Center of South Dakota, and Buddhist Center in Sioux Falls.

The event includes the Muslim Community, so here is some important research on what the underlining agenda could be:

Interfaith Dialogue: A Guide for Muslims is a Muslim Brotherhood publication. In the Acknowledgements, the authors recognize the role played by known American Brotherhood entities and those in habitual relations with them, including the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Graduate School of Islamic Social Science (GSISS), and the IIIT:

“We thank ISNA, especially Dr. Sayyid M. Syeed and Dr. Louay Safi, and that International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT) for their professional and moral support. … The Salam Institute for Peace and Justice and the Center for Interfaith Studies and Dialogue (CSID)”

The book also identifies ISNA as taking the lead role in interfaith activities, while CAIR is given the social justice and civil rights portfolio. These are recognized Brotherhood entities known to be operating in the United States. Interfaith Dialogue was published by IIIT, the Explanatory Memorandum identified the IIIT as a Muslim Brotherhood entity,and the IIIT’s homepage states it is dedicated “towards the Islamization of knowledge.” The IIIT also certified the Reliance of the Traveller – A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law as an authoritative translation of shariah under the signature block of Dr. Taha Jabir Al-Alwani, then the president of the IIIT, the Fiqh Council of North America, and a member of the Islamic Fiqh Academy in Jeddah The Fiqh Council of North America (the ISNA Fiqh Council [IFC] in the Explanatory Memorandum) is still a subordinate element of ISNA. The Islamic Fiqh Academy in Jeddah is a subordinate element of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

Another indicator that Interfaith Dialogue reflects the Muslim Brotherhood mission is the repeated allusion to bridge building. Sayyid Qutb uses this term in Milestones to set the limits of dawah interaction with non-Muslims: “the chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but only so that the people of Jahiliyyah may come over to Islam.” The very use of the bridge building meme serves as a signal to other Brotherhood members that they are operating inside the fold, that the interfaith narrative is designed to set the conditions for bringing people to Islam while also setting the preconditions for the use of force (jihad). Brotherhood commitments to interfaith dialogue should never be understood to extend beyond the parameters set by Qutb.

The relationship of the IIIT to both Interfaith Dialogue and Reliance of the Traveller requires that we understand Interfaith Dialogue strictly in terms of IIIT’s commitment to shariah (as stated in Reliance) and in conjunction with the Brotherhood objectives to which it is associated. This is reasonable because, as the Explanatory Memorandum states, the IIIT is committed to the “enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and a stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims' causes domestically and globally … and supports the global Islamic State wherever it is.” It is not reasonable to do otherwise.

Here is more from another source:

And herein lies the deception that characterizes the so-called interfaith programs, which have been growing so popular in America since 9/11, and underscores their greatest flaw. The basic belief that pervades these programs is that Jews, Christians, and Muslims all pray to one God, giving logic to the argument that we should be able to find common ground for living together in peace. But observant Muslims, whose understanding of the Quran is literal (as is obligatory), do not believe this. In the Quran, Allah curses the Jews and Christians282, and forbids Muslims to be friends with them. Observant Muslims believe that their God, Allah in Arabic, is greater than the God (or gods) worshipped by non-Muslims, and the statement “Allahu Akhbar” or “Allah is greater” is often used as a jihad war cry.

Thus the efforts of well-meaning and naïve Christians and Jews, who reach out to religious Muslims in an effort to ‘build bridges’ within the ecumenical community, too often open the doors to the underlying mission of Hamas, CAIR, and the Muslim Brotherhood, to infiltrate and undermine those who reject Islam as their religion and Allah as their God. Comfortable practicing taqiyyah in order to further their greater mission, they pursue their goal to participate in the “grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

So when jihadist organizations call for interfaith outreach and participate in interfaith programs, there is legitimate room for concern. There is the very real apprehension that a hidden agenda, consistent with the ideological mission of Islamic resurgence and ultimate dominance, is at play. No doubt there are some Muslims who sincerely believe in outreach to their non-Muslim neighbors. But the duplicity of those engaged in civilization jihad puts all Muslims under a cloud of suspicion that such outreach may be tainted.

Note that Taneeza Islam worked for both ISNA and CAIR. As I have already investigated, she is using smoke and mirrors to deceived South Dakotans throughout the state of South Dakota by silencing those who present the type of research I just put up. by calling us Islamophobes. This is a tactic of the Muslim Brotherhood:

The growing violence in the demonstrations on campus and in the street fits comfortably into the Brotherhood’s program of civilization jihad, confusing and conflating issues in an increasingly complex network of alliances. This comes right out of the Brotherhood playbook. It generates the chaos and violence associated with the unrest, but is wrapped in the protective mantle of political correctness that calls any opposition to its agenda “Islamophobia.” Anyone opposing its agenda is branded an Islamophobe.

The duplicity that underlies the practice of Civilization Jihad has made it possible for the Muslim Brotherhood and its network of supporting organizations to make significant headway in its mission, with little resistance from mainstream America. On the contrary, the mainstream seems to have largely embraced the calls for ‘diversity’, and distanced itself from anything that can be branded Islamophobic. In the growing disorder that is fast becoming a dangerously volatile environment on American universities and city streets, the Brotherhood has found feckless collaborators who are more than willing to help lay the groundwork for Islamization.

Their growing hysteria in the quest for ‘diversity’ and their need to protect Muslims against perceived ‘Islamophobia’ have stifled free speech and limited the right of Americans to discuss real issues relating to the role of Islam in America. This is one of the outcomes of civilization jihad, and proof of how successful the Brotherhood’s civilization jihad has been. The substantial amount of documentation that is now available about the Brotherhood’s alliances with Hamas-supporting organizations allows for little doubt that the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda in America is a real and growing threat to the values that are the core of American society.

More to come on Taneeza Islam's role in implementing the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad right here in South Dakota. The so-called Interfaith movement is setting the stage to fool followers of Christianity, and South Dakota legislators of all religious and secular persuasions. This is how the Islamists work to destroy Western political systems from within. Don't let the bullies get a way with using denigrating labels such as racist, bigots, and Islamophobes from preventing you from looking at research from counter terrorism experts and those of us that are vetting such research. It is most important that we have a civil, constructive, and respectful dialogue on this very important issue. Most important...the concern is not with all Muslims. The concern is with the Muslim Brotherhood's agenda that is a danger to all, including most Muslims.

 

 

Comments

[Lora hubbel]

Will be posting this to FB.....great article

[larry kurtz]

Republican is simply another word for earth hater and nobody proves that more often than Lora Hubbel. Hate is a South Dakota value.

[larry kurtz]

Sidearms for the pre-born! My thoughts and prayers are for the earth haters in my home state blowing each other to smithereens with their gun humping brethren.