Sibby Online

Muslim Brotherhood declares the United States its enemy, as its front groups continue to operate within our borders, including South Dakota

Where is the media on this revelation:

In the first official statement of its kind, the Muslim Brotherhood announced last month that it now regards the United States of America as an enemy, following President Trump's decision to move its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. The statement was published on the Brotherhood's Arabic language website, where it often publishes more incendiary rhetoric.

"Jerusalem is an Islamic and Arab land, for which we make blood, freedom and life, and we fight every aggressor and every supporter of aggression," the statement said.

It called for a unified Islamist and Palestinian response "to ignite an uprising throughout the Islamic world against the Zionist occupation and the American administration in support of the occupation and against the rights and freedoms of the peoples."

A week later, the Brotherhood issued a second release, an open letter to Arab leaders with similarly inciteful rhetoric, accusing the leaders of weakness in face of the "Zionist entity." It urged these leaders to "enable their people" to defend Jerusalem and the Al-Aqsa mosque.

This statement cannot be brushed aside as simply harsh words or empty threats by some anonymous jihadist group online. The Brotherhood is the world's oldest and most famous Islamist group. Its message declaring America an enemy state is enormous because it reaches millions of followers across the globe. It is an unprecedented official confrontation with the United States.

And this leads us to a discussion of the Muslim Brotherhood front groups that operate within the borders of the United States. In Ilana Freedman's, Hamas, CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood: The Plot to Destroy America, we learn that the anti-Semitic movement has impacted American college campuses:

By far the most vocal, Hamas-driven group on college campuses today is the Boycott, Divest, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which was launched in 2005.

And...

The growing antisemitism on American college campuses today has been fueled by BDS activists, who in turn have received support not only from the Hamas network in the U.S., but from another, unlikely source. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) organization, an aggressive and sometimes violent movement that claims to represent more than 50 black organizations, endorsed BDS in August 2016. As the black movement blended with other belligerent political organizations and moved its anger between college campuses and the streets, the growing aggressiveness of BDS made it a likely partner, and brought Hamas into the center of a growing and hostile movement that took violence into the street. The support that BDS received from this highly visible group resulted in a dramatic growth of support for the Hamas-led movement. Beyond limiting the free speech of those with whom they don’t agree, these organizations vehemently oppose efforts to promote peace talks and ‘normalization’ between Israel and the Palestinians.

CAIR has given open support to BDS and the boycott of Israeli products, despite the fact that such support goes far beyond its own clear mission, as stated on its website: “CAIR's mission is to enhance understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding."

Yet in May 2015, CAIR posted a message on its website, urging Americans to contact their members of Congress to urge them to challenge the passage of the 2015 US-European Union trade bill, which it called anti- BDS legislation. CAIR demanded that the bill be amended to change the language that would penalize European countries opposed to trade with Israel. In this, CAIR reached far beyond its own mission to urge support for a movement designed to destroy a foreign country’s economy.

Omar Barghouti, a founding member of the BDS campaign against Israel, explained the endgame for BDS:

“A Jewish state in Palestine in any shape or form cannot but contravene the basic rights of the indigenous Palestinian…most definitely we oppose a Jewish state in any part of Palestine….Ending the occupation doesn’t mean anything if it doesn’t mean upending the Jewish state itself.”

Barghouti was also a founding member of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI). This organization operates under the BDS banner but with a different focus, calling on “academics and intellectuals…in the international community to comprehensively and consistently boycott all Israeli academic and cultural institutions…”

And...

The collaboration of Hamas-supporting organizations like BDS, Black Lives Matter, and the Muslim Brotherhood have created a culture of hate and class warfare that bodes ill for America.

In South Dakota that culture of hate and class warfare is being lead with the collaboration of leftist Cory Heideiberger and Islamist Taneeza Islam:

Note Taneeza used the cultural Neo-Marxist white supremacy theme often used by Heidelberger to shame critics into silence. And banning critics of Islam is a component of Sharia Law:

The ideas and practices of the leaders, preachers, and movements of the Islamic revival movement known as Islamism (also known as Political Islam), have been criticized by Muslims (often Islamic modernists and liberals) and non-Muslims. Among those authors and scholars who have criticized Islamism, or some element of it, include Maajid Nawaz, Reza Aslan,  Abdelwahab Meddeb,  Muhammad Sa'id al-'Ashmawi,  Khaled Abu al-Fadl,  Gilles Kepel,  Matthias Küntzel,  Joseph E. B. Lumbard, and Olivier Roy.

Among the tenets of the Islamist movement that have come under criticism include: restrictions on freedom of expression to prevent apostasy from and insults to Islam; that Islam is not only a religion but a governing system; that historical Sharia, or Islamic law, is one, universal system of law, accessible to humanity, and necessary to enforcement for Islam to be truly practiced.

Note that not all Muslims agree with Islamism. It is wrong for the left to accuse the trumpet blowers that they hate all Muslims. It is the Muslim Brotherhood that is behind the movement that is intent on removing the status of Nation-States in order to establish a global caliphate. In other wards, these Neo-Nazis Islamofascists intend on implementing a theocracy. Taneeza Islam is one of the operatives, and I have told Cory Heidelberger that via email. Yet he continues to support the cause.

I wrote that in November 2017. On November 28th I confronted Taneeza Islam in person asking her to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and their support of Hamas. She refused to answer the question. A month later the Muslim Brotherhood declares the United States as its enemy. Then last week, Taneeza Islam was at the South Dakota Legislative session participating in the ECLA's Interfaith Day, which is component of the Muslim Brotherhood's Jihad:

If the tip I received about Taneeza Islam (who has had high level direct involvement with Muslim Brotherhood front groups CAIR and ISNA and has refused to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and its support of Hamas) is true, then we need to see clearly what her real agenda is to bring the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad to our state government:

As discussed in Part 2, dawah is more extensive and more closely associated with jihad than the prevailing narrative suggests. While the focus of this book is on the role of dawah in undermining national security and civil society, the dawah mission extends into multiple lines of operation directed at multiple subversion efforts, including government, media, education, and religion. As Brigadier S.K. Malik makes clear, the object of jihad is the destruction of the will through, among other things, spiritual warfare as an actual form of warfare. What follows is a discussion of a parallel Muslim Brotherhood penetration operation into the Interfaith Community that supports Brotherhood efforts in the governmental and media sectors.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s 1991 Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group was admitted into a Federal court as evidence that a disorientation strategy exists that aligns with Brigadier Malik’s explanation of the preparation stage in the Quranic concept of war. As explained in both the Explanatory Memorandum and Methodology of Dawah, early Brotherhood lines of operation begin with efforts to penetrate institutions so that downstream efforts can be supported from within. This is what the Brotherhood is referring to when it says it seeks “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers."

While penetrating government and civil organizations is important, the interfaith movement constitutes a major supporting line of operation in Brotherhood penetration operations. Through subversion of the interfaith community, the Brotherhood seeks to manipulate other religions in furtherance of dislocating their faith.

It will be interesting to see how South Dakota's media covers this.

As normal the South Dakota media has not covered the Muslim Brotherhood's role in South Dakota, which is implementation of its Civilizational Jihad. Instead they help the Brotherhood denigrate those of us who are exposing the Brotherhood's agenda for being Islamophobes who hate all Muslims. That is a false attack designed to silence critics of a movement that has now declared the United States its enemy.  In JUne of 2017 I sent an email to Cory Heidelberger explaining that the problem is not about Muslims, but about the Muslim Brotherhood.

It is going to take a huge grass roots movement armed with the truth to counter this. Will you do your part? It is time to ask Taneeza Islam to publicly denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, that is if she truly does represents South Dakota's voices for peace.

More reasons for Bishop Zellmer to question his interfaith partnership with Taneeza Islam

Yesterday I gave reasons for David Zellmer of the South Dakota Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) to question his inclusion of Taneeza Islam during his Interfaith Day during a South Dakota legislative session last week. Here is more reasons:

Ron Branstner, a researcher based out of St. Cloud, Minnesota, had booked space at the Sioux Falls History Club for Oct. 26. This is a club that has a 100-year history of discussing world events from the perspective of free and open debate.

But while driving to the event Thursday night, Branstner received phone a call from the venue and was told not to come. A powerful Democratic politician with connections to the history club had been contacted by a Muslim lawyer named Taneeza Islam.

Apparently, that’s all it takes in Sioux Falls to shut down the First Amendment, said Branstner, whose presentation was focused, ironically, on Islam and the First Amendment.

“I was going there to speak about the First Amendment, our first right to free speech, and how it is being stolen from us,” Branstner said. “We ended up having to change the venue to another town 27 miles away and so everyone had to drive 27 miles to hear my presentation.”

The female Muslim attorney, Taneeza Islam, has connections to radical Islamist Linda Sarsour and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR. She is involved with the Islamic Center of Sioux Falls, the same mosque that protested former Muslim Shahram Hadian’s speaking event earlier this year in the city.

Taneeza Islam is a Bush Foundation fellow and civil-rights activist who also works as an immigration attorney, representing Muslim refugees and illegal aliens from Central America. She also pushes the idea that anyone who objects to unlimited refugee resettlement and illegal immigration in America is a “white nationalist.”

Antifa, an amalgamation of Marxist/anarchist groups seeking to destabilize the U.S. from within, is planning a series of nationwide protests Nov. 4 with the stated goal of bringing down the presidency of Donald Trump. Islam promotes the #CounterACThate meme on Facebook which tries to shut down and destroy ACT For America chapters holding meetings to educate people about Shariah law.

“She’s connected to that mosque in Sioux Falls, and very politically active,” Hadian said.
And that mosque, the Islamic Center of Sioux Falls, is owned lock, stock and barrel by the North American Islamic Trust or NAIT, which has been linked to the extremist Muslim Brotherhood.

“She was there at a protest outside the hotel where I spoke in April, she was with the imam doing the prayers, they had all the interfaith people standing around them with their backs to the Muslims and their faces turned out while the Muslims were doing their prayers, that’s a great picture of how foolish these people are,” Hadian said of the April event.

Here is more on the NAIT, owner of the Islamic Center of Sioux Falls, from Ilana Freedman's Hamas, CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood: The Plot to Destroy America:

The Holy Land Foundation trial became the largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history. In November 2008, the principals were found guilty on charges of providing material support to Hamas, a designated foreign terrorist organization, and with funneling $12.4 million to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) through its secret money laundering channels.

One of the outcomes of the trial was the creation of a long list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation affair (see Appendix VI). Among those on the list were leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in America and some of its organizations, such as ISNA, NAIT, and CAIR, that helped support Brotherhood efforts to fund Hamas.

In a 2008 memo to the U.S. District Court in Dallas, federal prosecutors wrote:

“ISNA and NAIT, in fact, shared more with HLF than just a parent organization [the Muslim Brotherhood]. They were intimately connected with the HLF and its assigned task of providing financial support to Hamas. … Shortly after Hamas was founded in 1987, as an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood, the International Muslim Brotherhood ordered the Muslim Brotherhood chapters throughout the world to create Palestine Committees, whose job it was to support Hamas with ‘media, money and men.’

“The U.S. Muslim Brotherhood created the U.S. Palestine Committee, which documents reflect was initially comprised of three organizations: the OLF (HLF), the IAP [Islamic Association for Palestine], and the UASR [United Association for Studies and Research]. CAIR was later added to these organizations.”

Among the wealth of intelligence that emerged from the trial was the revelation of the extent to which the Muslim Brotherhood either founded or took control of the multitude of Muslim organizations in America. Money came to the organization from zakat paid to organizations like the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the North American Islamic Trusts (NAIT). Funds were then diverted to Hamas in Gaza and other jihadist organizations through a variety of money-laundering channels.

Here are reasons why we should be concerned with the possible Hams-linked connections to the Islamic Center of Sioux Falls:

Like Northern Virginia, Boston, Massachusetts has proven to be a safe haven for Hamas-linked activity, and the building of mosques, community centers, and charitable enterprises. Known for its extremely liberal and inclusive culture, and its liberal environment and penchant for political correctness, Massachusetts was a logical place for Islamic jihad to flourish.

The Boston story begins with a small, colorful building on a quiet residential street in Cambridge, Massachusetts, known as the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB). The ISB has been at the center of years of speculation because of the connection of many of its leaders and worshippers to Islamic terrorism. Since its inception, the mosque has successfully utilized the “media savvy Islamist networks that practice interfaith dialogue in front of the cameras, but preach hatred behind closed doors.”

The mosque was founded in 1981, by Abdurahman Alamoudi. Born in Eritrea, Alamoudi immigrated to the U.S. in 1979 and settled in the Boston area, where he soon became active in the local Muslim community. He was active in establishing the ISB, and after signing the Society's articles of incorporation, he served as the mosque’s first president until he left Boston for Washington, DC in 1985.

While still in Boston, Alamoudi was allied with the Muslim Brotherhood’s spiritual adviser Yousef al-Qaradawi, a terrorist supporter and rabid anti-Semite, who has authored fatwas calling for jihad against Israel and the Jews, and authorized suicidebombing attacks against women and children. Qaradawi once described the tactic of suicide terrorism against Israeli civilians as “one of the greatest forms of jihad.”

Alamoudi was one of the original members of the mosque’s Board of Trustees, although his name was suddenly removed from the list following its discovery in 2000.

The ISB was the site of many controversial speakers, including Yasir Qadi, who addressed a meeting of the Islamic Society of Boston at its Cambridge mosque. A Muslim employee of the Boston Redevelopment Authority later said about that meeting:

"We also are very troubled by a recent sermon given by a visiting preacher, Sheikh Yasir Qadi, at the ISB's Cambridge center. Sheikh Yasir Qadi has previously denied the Holocaust, claimed that Jews want to destroy Muslims, and called all non-Muslims (including Jews and Christians) a "spiritually filthy substance" whose lives and property hold no value and are forfeit to Muslims during Jihad."

Qadi was well-known for these opinions, which he generally expressed only to Arabic-speaking audiences. An apparently fervent practitioner of taqiyya, he refrained from sharing his distasteful views with English speaking audiences.

In recent years, a growing number of mosques began to appear throughout eastern Massachusetts. Taking advantage of Boston’s love for diversity, they were often built in neighborhoods distinguished by their ethnic makeup.

South Dakota's liberal Christian and political groups ideological worldview based on multiculturalism may lead them to form alliances with Muslim Brotherhood Islamists. The hate mongering from the radical leftist like Cory Heidelberger only adds fuel to their commitment to not listen to those who are brining warnings to South Dakotans. Calling critics of the Muslim Brotherhood movement Islamophobes, bigots and racists are creating splits among South Dakotans as it prevents a constructive discussion of the results of federal investigations of the past.

A second reason for the Lutherans to ignore this research is the money they receive via taxpayers thru the federal Refugee Resettlement programs. This means they have a financial conflict of interest and don't care their Interfaith propaganda includes anti-Semitic groups. Sadly, another example of legalized corruption in South Dakota, but this time it involves the Democratic left.

Bishop Zellmer needs to confront Interfaith partner Taneeza Islam's failure to denounce anti-Semitic terrorist group Hamas

On January 10, 2018 we experienced the Muslim Brotherhood's latest action to infiltrate South Dakota's state government with their interfaith tactic. Here is more on how this developed:

Lutheran Day has been on the calendar for several years at the Capitol, according to Bishop David Zellmer of the South Dakota Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), who addressed the group in the Rotunda. But this year he and other religious leaders across the state invited representatives of a raft of different religions – several Christian denominations, Buddhism, Islam and Judaism, among others.

A flyer distributed in the Rotunda described what prompted the inclusion of additional religious traditions: “[W]e have recently witnessed a rise in activities that degrade other religions and denies the religious freedom of many, especially Muslims and Jews.”

Here is more from their press release:

We are people of different faiths across South Dakota who, in keeping with this state’s and country’s traditions and values, are committed to ending anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic sentiment in our state and in our country.

The press release also has a list of promoters who called the event includes Taneeza Islam South Dakota Voices for Peace. She refused to denounce anti-Semitic terrorist group Hamas on November 28, 2017 at the University of South Dakota. Previous to coming to South Dakota, she was Civil Rights director of CAIR-MN.  On November 18, CAIR-MN leader, also refused to denounce Hamas:

Symposium speakers Saturday, Nov. 18, 2017, at the St. Cloud Public Library were, from left, John Matsunaga, Sally Sudo, professor Yuichiro Onishi and CAIR Minnesota Director Jaylani Hussein.

The Minnesota leader of the Council on American-Islamic Relations was asked during a community meeting Saturday if he would renounce the terrorist organization Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

He refused.

The event at the St. Cloud Public Library was part of CAIR’s ongoing “anti-Islamophobia” campaign that it launched in the wake of the election one year ago of President Donald Trump.

And...

Local resident Elizabeth Baklaich reminded the professor that America “already had that trigger moment.”

“That trigger moment was 9/11. There were 3,000 people who died,” she said. “… [T]hat was a direct attack that was followed up by war, and if we were going to make this same maneuver against Muslims, it would have happened. … I just wanted to bring that up because I think that’s a fundamental flaw in your thesis,” Baklaich said.

To Hussein, she directed another question.

“I heard you talk about fear Jaylani, and there’s one thing you could do very easily that would help alleviate a tremendous amount of fear in this community,” Baklaich said.

She reminded him of the FBI evidence presented in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial of 2007 that showed CAIR is a front group for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

“If you want to be our friend, and you want to be part of the community, and want us to accept you more, and work with you and be less fearful of what’s coming in, and what’s going on, are you willing to condemn both Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood?” she asked.

In a rambling response that quickly morphed into a stern lecture before ending with a hostile rebuke, Hussein refused to condemn either Hamas or the Brotherhood.

Here is an excerpt of his response, captured on audio tape:

CAIR is the largest civil rights and civil liberties organization. We have 35 chapters across the United States. We’re an American organization. We are a grassroots organization, supported and funded by people locally, made up of people who look like you and look like me. I understand that my organization comes under threat and know why we come under attack. It’s not because of our silence. It’s because we carry a big stick, we remind people of the Constitution. We remind people that American Muslims are exactly like everyone else. And we’re not gonna allow anyone to threaten us, or create the fact that Muslims have to hide, and so we are an organization just like any other organization. We get audited. We get reviewed, we are a state-accredited organization and so if you think we are a terrorist organization then call the FBI and let them know, and let them investigate.

Hussein accused the woman of using the “talking points” of well-funded “anti-Muslim organizations” that spread “lies” about Muslims across the U.S.

Another woman interjected with the same question for Hussein.

“Do you renounce Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood?” she can be heard saying on the audio recording.

“I am a civil rights organization in the state of Minnesota,” Hussein continued.

“That means no. … So you do support Hamas?” she asked again.

“The questions you are asking me, you didn’t come up with them. You downloaded them from somewhere,” Hussein said.

“So what? I can see the trial [documents] right here. I’ve got it right here,” she said.

“That’s good for you,” said a now totally irritated Hussein. “Why don’t you turn those [documents] over to the authorities and let them actually do the work?”

“They already have them,” the woman answered.

“And they’re not going to do anything,” said Hussein.

“Obama would not let it proceed. He would not let it go forward,” she said.

“Thank you very much,” Hussein said, ending the interchange without ever answering the question of whether CAIR supports or condemns Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Hamas is listed by the U.S. State Department as a designated foreign terrorist organization, and the Muslim Brotherhood has been banned by at least eight countries as a terrorist organization, including Russia, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Egypt.

Robert Spencer also reports that CAIR official refuse to denounce Hamas:

This egregious USA Today article is full of the usual nonsense: it’s “anti-Muslim” to oppose jihad terror, Hamas-linked CAIR is presented as if it were the civil rights organization it claims to be, without any indication of the fact that CAIR officials have refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.

An unsavory Hamas-linked group and a hard-Left smear group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, should not be allowed to control who speaks about security issues and who doesn’t, much less to control the public discourse to the extent that only its point of view is represented in a major newspaper. But that is the world we live in today.

I found this in Ilana Freedman's extensive research on the Hamas, CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood nexus:

Moreover, Ellison has himself been linked to the Muslim American Society (MAS), a Virginia-based non-profit 501(C)(3) organization, founded in 1993 to act as the “overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.” (On its website, MAS describes itself simply as “a dynamic charitable, religious, social, cultural, and educational, organization” with “more than 50 chapters across the United States.”

MAS embraces the orthodox Islamic teachings of Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna, which its members consider “the closest reflection of how Islam should be in this life,” and its officers, past and present, are activists in Islamic and Hamas-linked organizations including the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim Student Association (MSA), and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). In 2014, MAS was among those listed as terrorist organizations by the United Arab Emirates.

In 2008, MAS paid $13,500 to cover the cost of Ellison’s hajj to Mecca. But Keith Ellison is just one of a growing legion of Muslim activists who have risen to prominence in the senior ranks of politics. The imperative for Muslims to insert themselves into the very fabric of American society is stated clearly on page 4 of the ‘Memorandum’:

“Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and a stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims’ causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims’ efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic State wherever it is.”

In all things, Hamas in the U.S. is an arm of the Ikhwan, as stated in Article Two of its Covenant, and supports this relationship in all of its facets:

“The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine. Moslem Brotherhood Movement is a universal organization, which constitutes the largest Islamic movement in modern times. It is characterized by its deep understanding, accurate comprehension and its complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgment, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult, and conversion to Islam.”

Although CAIR promotes itself as a civil rights champion for American Muslims, its origins in the Muslim Brotherhood are well documented. In 2008, during the Holy Land Foundation retrial, CAIR was identified as “a front group for Hamas” in the testimony of an FBI special agent, and named an unindicted co-conspirator, along with two of its officers. Two years later, a federal judge ruled that there was “ample evidence” to prove that CAIR was a part of “a conspiracy to support Hamas.”

Note that Taneeza Islam worked for ISNA prior to working for CAIR-MN and that the Islamic Center of Sioux Falls is owned by NAIT.

I would think Bishop Zellmer would find it troubling to be in a partnership that is about fighting anti-Semitism with a person who has such close ties to Hamas whose covenant includes the "science of the occult" and whose mission is to destroy Jews. He needs to confront Taneeza Islam in regard to those facts, otherwise he is an accomplice in the Muslim Brotherhood Jihad. Freedman's introduction helps us understand what Taneeza Islam is really doing in South Dakota:

Those who challenge the myth that Hamas does not exist in America are mocked and labeled as “Islamophobes” by both Muslim society and the politically correct. For the PC population, it is easier and more comfortable to reject both empirical evidence and judicial findings, and choose to believe that they are safe in a country where, they have convinced themselves, terrorism is only an occasional aberration and Islamic subversion doesn’t exist.

As noted above, Hamas is the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) based in Gaza, but operates in the West generally and the United States (U.S.) specifically under the secret cloak provided by a host of Brotherhood organizations. The most prominent of these is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which purports to be a community service organization, but in fact serves as the public face of the underground Hamas in America.

Now we know why Taneeza refused to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and its support of Hamas. What we should find out from Zellmer is if he still is comfortable having Interfaith Dialogue with Taneeza Islam, if the goal is to fight anti-Semitism.

Senator Tapio confronts the Interfaith Civilizational Jihad that arrived at South Dakota's legislative session yesterday

The Argus Leader reports on Senator Tapio's courageous confrontation with the Interfaith Civilizational Jihad that took place yesterday during South Dakota's legislative session:

A state senator confronted members of an interfaith prayer group at the Capitol Wednesday, accusing them of disparaging him as a "racist."

Sen. Neal Tapio, R-Watertown, watched as about 50 people representing various religions while they prayed at the Capitol rotunda Wednesday morning. The faith leaders prayed for tolerance and religious acceptance on what was the Legislature's second day in session.

Members of the group invited Tapio to join them for a group photo. Tapio, looking uncomfortable, stood with them as cameras clicked and flashed.

Then he turned his back to the cameras and began yelling at those around him, "I don't like being called a racist."

The AL provided this quote:

They might not like seeing us here," said Mohammed Sharif, director of the Islamic Center of Sioux Falls, "but we’re going to continue to be here, we will keep representing our communities."

Here is what the AL did not inform their readers about:

The property for the Islamic Center of Sioux Falls is owned by the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), meaning it is a part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s jihadi network in America waging “Civilization Jihad.”

At the event on April 9th, a muslim man entered the event while filming on Facebook Live.  He filmed a Koran he was holding in his hand, scanned/filmed the audience with his phone, and was then stopped by security/police because filming was not permitted.  He told them he was leaving, and then lied to them and said his name is “John Smith.”  In fact, the man’s name is Ehab Jaber.

On Jaber’s facebook page it is clear he is anti-police and pro-sharia (Islamic Law).  During his video of the event in question, he made very derogatory remarks about those in attending.

On video, Jaber proceeded to his car where he filmed several weapons including  3 pistols and two rifles.  While brandishing the weapons Jaber commented, “be terrified.”

It should be noted two South Dakota legislators were in attendance at the event.

Cory Heidelberger allowed Sharif to leave this comment on his web site:

is there any decent person in Watertown to call out this tAPio little man to quit wasting their time and start working for them as he supposed too!

Pat Powers has a photo of the event that shows Taneeza Islam present at the event. I have already reported on Taneeza's work with CAIR and ISNA, which are two Muslim Brotherhood front groups, and her refusal to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and their support of terrorist group Hamas. On CAIR's Facebook, Taneeza said this about Tapio:

Islamophobia Watch: South Dakota Voices for Peace Denounces Comments Made by Elected Official at Islamophobic EventsContact: Taneeza Islam, (605)782-9560

On September 18, 2017, an Islamophobic and anti-refugee and anti-immigrant event entitled “Liberty Rally” at the Hilton Garden Inn Downtown, which was co-sponsored by Minnehaha and Moody County GOP, and the Family Heritage Alliance, featured guest speaker Trevor Loudon. Loudon attacked the Southern Poverty Law Center stating “It’s like having the Nazi party give you advice on anti-Semitism” and associated long standing Muslim organizations in the United States as terrorist organizations. Mr. Loudon is from New Zealand and said he is working on “additional vetting for refugees and possible legislation for SD lawmakers to consider.”

At the same event State Senator Neal Tapio (R-Watertown) said that the state "needs to form an army of legislators fighting in Pierre," and that due to the small size of our state and conservative majority, these bills could become a model for other states.

"This event's fear mongering rhetoric is right out of the Islamophobic playbook. The speaker from New Zealand, Mr. Loudon, and Senator Tapio don't understand how policies around terrorism are made," Taneeza Islam, executive director for South Dakota Voices for Peace said.

"Legislators on the fringes of their party have been trying to pass these baseless but fear-mongering pieces of legislation designating certain Muslim charities and organizations for years to no avail.” Designating Muslim organizations through legislation was first introduced in 2014 by former Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) and then again in 2015 and again in 2017 by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX). The US State Department has a thorough process on identifying terrorist organization and adds and delists organizations. "That is NOT a state issue or a power which should be exercised within the legislative branch.”

"Sen. Tapio hasn’t done his research in SD. The organizations he wants to legislate being terrorist organizations have no presence in SD. By reigniting racist ideology in our rural communities, Sen. Tapio needs to see that he is re-traumatizing refugees in our communities. South Dakota deserves better. South Dakota doesn't deserve imported hate.” said Policy Director Samantha Spawn. On August 9, 2018, Sen. Tapio spoke at a at another Islamophobic event, sponsored by SPLC identified hate group Americans First Task Force in Aberdeen. There he falsely asserted that Muslim Brotherhood came to Pierre during legislative session and associated the Aberdeen Development Corporation, the Aberdeen Chamber of Commerce and even the mayor with Muslim Brotherhood.

Taneeza is the one who has a playbook, and it is from the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad whose tactic includes getting liberal interfaith Christians to attack fellow Christians. That is what happened in Pierre yesterday. If a Christian refuses to join in with the interfaith movement, then we are denigrated as bigots, racists, and Islamophobes. In South Dakota we have not only Islamists, Cultural Neo-Marxist leftists, and liberal interfaith Christians repeating that false mantra, but also the SDGOP crony capitalists, including the Chamber of Commerce and Governor Daugaard joining in the attack on those blowing the whistle on the Muslim Brotherhood's infiltration of South Dakota.

How liberal Interfaith Christians are fooled into implementing the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad by calling other Christians Islamophobes

Stephen Coughlin's "Bridge-Building" to Nowhere: The Catholic Church’s Case Study in Interfaith Delusion, provides us insight into how liberal Christian leaders are tricked into participating in Interfaith activities such as today's Interfaith Day in Pierre:

The IIIT [International Institute of Islamic Thought] identifies the interfaith movement’s non-Muslim members (called “partners”) as vulnerable to penetration by virtue of their willingness to abide by self-imposed postmodern regimes, ultimately designed to deconstruct their respective faiths. This becomes clear only when Interfaith Dialogue is read in light of the IIIT’s mission statement, Muslim Brotherhood doctrines, and the Islamic law that the IIIT certifies. For the Brotherhood, the interfaith venue represents an optimal platform for penetration into the leadership circles of religious organizations. As will be seen, much of the IIIT strategy relies on the interfaith movement’s own rules, which enable Brotherhood partners to coopt, neutralize, and undermine their non-Muslim partners in the preparation stage as Islam seeks to transition from weakness to strength.

Temple University’s Leonard Swindler and Richard Landau, in Beliefnet, provide a sampling of the rules that Interfaith Dialogue identifies as governing such dialogue. On point is Swindler’s principle that “dialogue must take place in an atmosphere of mutual trust.” This “mutual trust” does not, however, rest on a full understanding of what each side believes, independent of what they disclose. Indeed, this “trust” can take precedence over what one may already know of the other faiths or what one could learn from competent research in the service of due diligence.

Related to the question of whether trust is in any way merited is the question of what distinguishes trust from witlessness. Brotherhood members are aware that shariah says that “when it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth,” it becomes “obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.” Does “mutual trust” survive such a disclosure? Should it? The Brotherhood mission is to impose shariah on the world. Before extending such trust, a simple due diligence review of Brotherhood entities engaged in the interfaith process would reveal this to be true. The Brotherhood shows little concern that their outreach partners will come to their senses, possibly because another of Swindler’s interfaith principles is that “each dialogue partner has the right to define his or her own religion and belief, [so that] the rest can only describe what it looks like to them from the outside.” This rule suggests that persons who undertake a reasonable effort to discharge their duty (to their own faiths) by performing a competent assessment of the “other’s” religions could be characterized as lacking the requisite trust by virtue of finding out. Could conformance to this rule help explain why fellow believers are routinely accused of intolerance by interfaith leaders and peers from within their own religious organizations?

Using Swindler’s principles to prohibit critical analysis of Islam, the Brotherhood can then leverage yet another principle—“participants entering into dialogue must be willing to reflect upon themselves and their own religion”—to justify withering assaults on the faiths of other interfaith organizations in the name of introspection while remaining consistent to the Milestones process. As expressed in Interfaith Dialogue, the Brotherhood’s ability to manipulate interfaith principles to facilitate a lack of reciprocity establishes a form of constructive subordination structured to lead to actual submission. As such, it facilitates the dhimmification of America’s non-Muslim clergy. Just note how often senior rabbis, ministers, and bishops turn on their own members when issues of Islam arise. Clearly the Brotherhood has targeted the interfaith community because its membership exhibits squish characteristics. The interesting question is whether the Brotherhood targeted the interfaith community in order to dislocate their faiths or whether it sees itself as manipulating outreach partners whose faiths have already been dislocated.

How else does one explain the lack of discernment? If postmodern rules governing the interfaith community operate beyond the superficial level, they run the risk of undermining core beliefs associated with any truly believed-in faith. Interfaith Dialogue’s authors understand that interfaith partners who actually take such principles to heart are likely to already be compromised in their own faiths. Richard Landau calls for members to “practice fairness when speaking for or about other faith(s)” and to “speak in a way that people of that religion can affirm as accurate.” Others, however, including the Brotherhood, recognize that non-Muslim partners who buy into this view are already predisposed to accept the Islamophobia narrative, because they already hold themselves to standards that require uncritical acceptance of outside narratives at the expense of their own beliefs and even of factual analysis (that puts the interfaith paradigm at risk). Selfcensorship before speaking, what the American legal system calls “prior restraint,” is established as a self-imposed rule of etiquette that effectively takes precedence over the requirements of one’s own faith and of reason.

And here is how an atheist, married to a liberal Christian, is tricked into the Muslim Brotherhood's deceptive Jihad:

These narratives are used to great effect to hollow out an audience’s faith. As the discussion on interfaith dialogue proceeds, the postmodern assault on faith will focus on the assault on reason. For example, when a faithful person’s adherence to the scriptures of his or her faith are designated a “misuse of scripture” by a fellow member of the same faith who feels the superior pull of interfaith requirements, a self-negating contradiction is being imposed within that faith. Holding back on the expression of a faithfully held scriptural proposition in deference to higher interfaith canons results in one’s cooperation in one’s own silencing, while holding to one’s belief results in being designated as rigid, intolerant, uncharitable, and fundamentalist. One cannot believe in one’s faith and in interfaith principles demanding their suppression at the same time without engaging in a logical contradiction that reduces faith to meaninglessness. Interfaith rules are thinly veiled postmodern assaults on reason that succeed by undermining basic principles of logic.

So the liberal Interfaith leaders in Pierre today give reason for Cory Heidelberger to falsely and illogically attack Christians for being racists, bigots, and Islamophobes. That causes disunity within the Christian community, which makes both Islamists and cultural Neo-Marxist leftist hate mongers very happy. The Christians that are willing to go along with the Interfaith Jihad of the Muslim Brotherhood are being played as fools by Taneeza Islam.

Interfaith Day in Pierre is part of the Muslim Brotherhood's Jihad designed to infiltrate South Dakota's state government

Pat Powers has posted Senator Neal Tapio's warning in regard to Interfaith Day that is part of today's legislative activities in Pierre:

Republican State Senator Neal Tapio of Watertown expressed concern today about the political motivations of “religious leaders” sponsoring the Interfaith Day at the Capital. A simple check of their social media accounts will verify these people violently oppose President Trump and his efforts to keep America safe.

An anonymous comment to the post includes this:

Pope Francis:
I do not believe it is right to identify Islam with violence. This is not right or true. I had a long conversation with the imam, the Grand Imam of the Al-Azhar University, and I know how they think . . . They seek peace. I don’t like to speak of Islamic violence, because every day, when I browse the newspapers, I see violence, here in Italy. this one who has murdered his girlfriend, another who has murdered the mother-in-law. and these are baptized Catholics! There are violent Catholics! If I speak of Islamic violence, I must speak of Catholic violence . . . and no, not all Muslims are violent, not all Catholics are violent. It is like a fruit salad; there’s everything. There are violent persons of this religion. this is true: I believe that in pretty much every religion there is always a small group of fundamentalists. Fundamentalists. We have them. When fundamentalism comes to kill, it can kill with the language.

Tapio's concerns are well founded based on Stephen Coughlin's, "Bridge-Building" to Nowhere: The Catholic Church’s Case Study in Interfaith Delusion:

For at least the last several decades, the so-called ‘interfaith dialogue’ movement has been methodically co-opted as a prime vehicle for pro-shariah Islamic influence operations--not just in the United States, but worldwide. The Catholic Church in particular has proven especially susceptible to a sophisticated strategy of manipulation whose goal is the dislocation of faith to advance submission to Islamic Law (shariah) under cover of cherished leftist, liberal values of acceptance, inclusion and tolerance.

In this new monograph by Islamic Law-nexus-to-terrorism expert Stephen Coughlin, the Center for Security Policy is pleased to offer a frank and insightful look at how jihadist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation take calculated advantage of liberal mindsets among Catholicsfrom the lay faithful through the clerical hierarchy and all the way to the Vatican itself. Such mindsets are often all too ready to surrender steadfast adherence to doctrinal Church teaching in order to win approval from cynical Islamic suitors whose true (but well-disguised) purpose is neutralization of Catholic opposition to their shariah agenda.

As Mr. Coughlin, himself a Roman Catholic, points out, it is intellectually impossible to adhere faithfully to Church doctrine and yet grant acceptance to principles that are fundamentally opposed to such precepts at the same time. To advance its shariah agenda, therefore, the jihadist strategy must achieve a definitive dislocation of faith that lures Catholics willingly to submerge their own core beliefs in favor of seductive relationships with Islamic interfaith partners whose approval and false friendship they foolishly come to prioritize over fealty to the pillars of their own faith. Suborned to the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood’s dawah operations (often described in English as proselytization, but includes the preparation for jihad), Catholics have even allowed themselves to set aside basic concern over the horrific fate of fellow Christians being slaughtered at the hands of their new-found interfaith dialogue partners’ Middle Eastern co-religionists and fellow Islamic supremacists like the Islamic State’s al-Baghdadi in order to preserve the equanimity of the interfaith dialogue.

Coughlin produced this monograph as an elucidation of an Appendix to his masterful 2015 work, Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad, recently published by the Center. Neither the book nor the monograph could possibly be more timely, as Pope Francis seems to be leading the Catholic Church in troubling directions increasingly amenable to the subversive objectives of Islamic supremacists for the interfaith dialogue movement. As the most senior leadership of the Catholic Church ought to know, when Muslim Brothers announce their intent to ‘build bridges,’ they hearken less to any thought of genuine dialogue than to the well-known dictum of the Ikhwan’s senior theoretician, Seyyid Qutb:

The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah [the society of unbelievers] is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but only so that the people of Jahiliyyah may come over to Islam.

There is a critical message implicit in Coughlin’s work that is equal parts cri de coeur for the Catholic faith that has inspired Western civilization for so many centuries and part stark warning for the institution that ought to be acting as a bulwark against the advancing encroachment of shariah—but that, instead, is visibly failing in its role of moral leadership and rather succumbing to the supremacist forces of Islamic jihad arrayed against it.

If the tip I received about Taneeza Islam (who has had high level direct involvement with Muslim Bortherhood front groups CAIR and ISNA and has refused to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and its support of Hamas) is true, then we need to see clearly what her real agenda is to bring the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad to our state government:

As discussed in Part 2, dawah is more extensive and more closely associated with jihad than the prevailing narrative suggests. While the focus of this book is on the role of dawah in undermining national security and civil society, the dawah mission extends into multiple lines of operation directed at multiple subversion efforts, including government, media, education, and religion. As Brigadier S.K. Malik makes clear, the object of jihad is the destruction of the will through, among other things, spiritual warfare as an actual form of warfare. What follows is a discussion of a parallel Muslim Brotherhood penetration operation into the Interfaith Community that supports Brotherhood efforts in the governmental and media sectors.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s 1991 Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group was admitted into a Federal court as evidence that a disorientation strategy exists that aligns with Brigadier Malik’s explanation of the preparation stage in the Quranic concept of war. As explained in both the Explanatory Memorandum and Methodology of Dawah, early Brotherhood lines of operation begin with efforts to penetrate institutions so that downstream efforts can be supported from within. This is what the Brotherhood is referring to when it says it seeks “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers."

While penetrating government and civil organizations is important, the interfaith movement constitutes a major supporting line of operation in Brotherhood penetration operations. Through subversion of the interfaith community, the Brotherhood seeks to manipulate other religions in furtherance of dislocating their faith.

It will be interesting to see how South Dakota's media covers this.

Roger Cornelius and Cory Heidelberger goes racist as they attack Senator Tapio

In order to make the false argument that Senator Tapio's concern is with all immigrants, Roger Cornelius and Cory Heidelberger goes down the path of racism:

Cornelius:  The Tapio’s I know from the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation are Mexican immigrants.

Heidelberger: Roger, if those Tapios aren’t already, tell them to get naturalized and registered to vote! We need ’em!

Cornelius: Sorry I neglected to mention that the Tapio’s on the reservation are 2nd and 3rd generation and are a political active family.

Heidelberger: 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants from Mexico—what? And they haven’t committed any terrorist acts or started Sharia Law?

So Heidelberger's political agenda now accuses Tapio of saying all immigrants are terrorists? Or does he mean all immigrants who skin isn't white? Sad that atheists don't understand that we are all descendants of Adam and Eve, making us one human race...thereby the color of our skin is not relevant. Sadly, they have to get people to hate whites in order to gain political allies. It is the Muslim Brotherhood, with the help of Cory Heidelberger who have started the implementation of Sharia Law in South Dakota, not Mexican immigrants.

Cory Heidelberger pimping out his wife as he continues his Sharia affair with Taneeza Islam

The comment section to Cory Heidelberger's post that defended Governor Daugaard's attack on Senator Neal Tapio for taking the first step in dealing with the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad in South Dakota included this question from Owen Reitzel:

So if they have the study, which I’m sure Tapio hopes will show all of the problems with immigrants, what do we do then? Build a wall around South Dakota? What’s the endgame?

This a propaganda technique that puts the cart in front of the court. As an informed society, we should first study the issue so that we have the understanding necessary to come up with an effective solution. But leftists like Cory Heidelberger are too busy playing politics and denigrating those they disagree with. The chief mocker of the South Dakota blogosphere is an anonymous person called grudznick:

If this Tapio fellow meets with Messrs. Jenssen and Nelson in a broom closet somewhere, is it a workgroup?

That shows that lack on interest in learning about the issue, and also a personal attack designed to distract from the conversation. Cory plays along with the mockery:

Grudz, that’s how Tapio will brand his broom closet.

Cory responds to Reitzel's question with this:

Owen, that is the question I’d like to answer. I posed a question like that to Stace Nelson, and I don’t think he ever answered. If immigrants and refugees really are an ISIS beachhead, isn’t the proper response immediate and indefinite detention of all Muslims on American soil?

I responded to that question with a series of email to Cory in late June 2017. If Cory was seriously paying attention, he would have not used the Muslim Brotherhood's tactic of painting all Muslims as victims. Here is my response:

In an email to Cory Heidelberger on June 29 I said:

Cory, Muslims are not the problem, the Muslim Brotherhood is the problem. But you are right, this has to be a sustained effort. Do you believe appeasing the Jihadis will solve the problem? I don't. I consider appeasing Jihadis, because we are afraid of pissing them off, to be the true Islamophobia. It takes great courage to take step 1 and publicly present the facts regarding the Muslim Brotherhood. The last thing we need is to be falsely accused of hating all Muslims and then denigrated by being called Islamophobes by those (such as those in the interfaith arena) who want to appease. That is the big lie and propaganda the Muslim Brotherhood wants us hear. So please, stop being part of the problem, and instead take a serious look at the research. Start with the Holyland Foundation investigation.

Sadly Heidelberger continues to be part of the problem.

There are two reasons why Cory is siding with the Muslim Brotherhood. The first is their common enemy...Christians:

What Cory refuses to grasp is that Islamic supremacy is an attack on the First Amendment. Taneeza Islam is on record for going after a private entity who was giving out notepads that said "Build with Jesus". Senator Stace Nelson tries to bring reason to Cory's post with this comment:

Ms. Islam attempts to victim blame those people who are rightfully fearful of the horrific and constant brutal acts taken in the name of her religion. Her former organization that she came to Pierre to defend, CAIR, in fact has been tied repeatedly to supporting the worst terrorist organizations in the world. Shouting “bigot” and making other false claims of “racism” and “Islamophobia” is nothing more than the victim blaming propaganda Islamic terrorist’s Nazi allies used to silence their victims.

On June 29 I informed Cory about Taneeza Islam's Jihadi agenda by answering his question, "Once everybody knows about the threat, what is everyone supposed to do about the threat?":

Then we need to remove the source of the threat. What would you think everyone would do if they ever learned and believed the funding source is the US State Department and CIA? Trump's son-in-law just worked out another deal that will send military munitions to the Muslim Brotherhood Jihadist groups. The leadership of both parties have done that in the past. It is all about staying good with the Saudis for the purpose of oil and gas resources, not only for America, but also for Europe. Can people deal with the reality that the refugees are running to America due to regime changes America is funding? Assad is the latest. There are two gas pipelines that need to run through Syria, but Assad is siding with Russia and Iran. So America is funding false flag operations that are wrongly putting the blame on Assad for gassing his own people. The CIA has done this several times in the Middle East and South America, all for protecting certain resources the oligarchy needs to make more money. I have found this through multiple sources. JFK stood up to these people, and they shot him in the head. This is why I hesitate to push for an overall solution. I believe we need to deal with this on a local level. What would people do if they understand that Mosques are not churches, but instead the Muslim Brotherhood's Jihad centers? The CIA and the State Department are partners with the Brotherhood for the above mentioned financial reasons. Do you really think the Oligarchy will let the American people deal with the Mosque's once they understand the truth? The Islamic Center in Sioux Falls is owned by the North America Islamic Trust, a Muslim Brotherhood front. The NAIT was set up by the Islamic Society of North America. Taneeza Islam was Youth Director for ISNA before she went on to work for CAIR, which is another Brotherhood front. Now she is in South Dakota, and we need to expose her real agenda. Senator Nelson is right. Unfortunately, the Sioux Falls Chamber has business dealings with the Saudis, so good luck confronting the Muslim Brotherhood agenda in Sioux Falls. It will take a lot of people being on the same page to do that. But as long as conservatives and liberals continue with the hate fest, the Oligarchy's Divide and Rule strategy will continue.

Sorry for the long answer, yet I have yet to touch even the surface on this issue. My experience at the conference in Sioux Falls on April 9 was a real wakeup call for me. I am still processing that experience. I go back and forth on whether I should stay below the radar, or be more aggressive in bringing the research to as many people's attention that I can.

I have decided to come out and publicly expose Taneeza's real agenda.

As stated above, the second and main reason for America allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate America is the crony capitalists' love of money, which includes the Sioux Falls Chamber of Commerce and thus Governor Daugaard. And Cory has the same problem with that corruption, as his wife is a pastor for the Lutherans who are receiving both federal and state of South Dakota money to help implement the Resettlement Hijra. Cory has a financial conflict of interest on this issue and may explain why he ignored my efforts to reason with him on this issue. Cory's efforts in protecting the Refugee Settlement program now makes him a participate in the SDGOP system of legalized corruption.

And it is for the love of money that liberal Christians like Betty Oldenkamp, the chief executive for Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota and a former cabinet member for state government, are part of the interfaith Jihad that will occur at the Pierre capitol on Wednesday. Taneeza, an immigration attorney, has bragged about the close cooperation she has with Oldenkamp, due to their efforts implement the Muslim Brotherhood's Hijra. And Oldenkamp is also worked as a member of the liberal SDGOP establishment whose love of money has fueled the corruption that has bubbled up in South Dakota. I got kicked off of Cory's web site because I made the argument that the liberal establishments of both political parties are part of the problem. Cory whines about the corruption, but refuses to allow a respectful and constructive conversation that could lead to minimizing the problem of corruption, which is the real reason for many of South Dakota's officials to allow the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate South Dakota towns...whether they know it or not. Tapio's study group would eliminate them not knowing what they are doing.

Speaking of restricting discussion on this issue, I have just confirmed, as of the time of this writing, that I am still banned from Heidelberger's so-called Dakota Free Press. South Dakota's media is a tool that the Muslim Brotherhood is using to silence those who are exposing their agenda:

If Cory would have done his research, he would understand that the Muslim Brotherhood's Civilizational Jihad is not necessarily a violent one. Second, Cory and Taneeza are attacking those who are critical of Islam, which is a violation of Sharia Law. Therfore, Cory and Taneeza have already taken the first step in the Muslim Brotherhood's Jihad whose goal is creating an Islamic State in South Dakota that enforces Sharia Law. Taneeza has already demonstrated that with her work in the Twin Cities of Minnesota.

In April Taneeza publically attacked a converted Muslim and promoted a protest against his April 9 Truth in Love presentation at the Sioux Falls Hilton Garden Inn. The Argus Leader promoted her so-call "antio-Muslim" propaganda tactic:

Taneeza Islam, a local immigration lawyer and organizer for the local Muslim community, mentioned the upcoming talk during a panel on hate crimes Thursday at the downtown library in Sioux Falls.

She cited speakers like Howse and Hadian as part of a prejudicial undercurrent that inspires fear among ethnic minorities nationwide. In Sioux Falls, that fear has grown in recent years.

The SPL Center’s website saw the number of hate groups listed as “anti-Muslim” jump from 34 in 2015 to 101 in 2016.

“Even though there haven’t been violent crimes in our area, the fear is there,” Islam said.

Islam said she’s pressed the Hilton Garden Inn South on whether their event policy excludes hate speech and hasn’t heard from them.

I attended that event and found out later that I was within 15 yards of a Muslim Jihadi who had filmed a Quran and them panned the crowd before being removed. I could be seen on that video. He then went into his vehicle and videoed his firarms, including assault weapons and said we sould be afraid and terrified. Here is Leo Hohmann's take:

In April 2017, a heavily armed Muslim Ehab Jabber infiltrated a Christian conference at a local hotel in Sioux Falls. He entered the ticketed event undetected with a handgun and was told to leave, then livestreamed threats to the Christians from his vehicle in the parking lot, where he had a cache of weapons including an assault rifle and hundreds of rounds of ammunition. Jaber has since pleaded guilty to federal weapons charges but the state charges remain unresolved. “I have a feeling they’re going to drop those charges. Lost his guns and right bear, is now a felon, but the other [local] prosecutor said the guy did nothing wrong.”

Cory Heidelberger and Taneeza Islam are partners in the Muslim Brotherhood's Jihad on South Dakota., In September CAIR National's Facebook featured a Taneeza Islam press release that featured a post from Cory's web site. Earlier in June, I warned Cory about Taneeza Islam. He has refused to listen as he continues his Sharia affair with her. He defends her with misinformation. The lady does not care about the First Amendment. She is the one that is imported hate into South Dakota. Sho attacked a former Muslim her converted to Christianity when he came to tell his story in Sioux Falls. Her public hatred of Islamic critics fueled a Jihadi attack at the event that we designed to threaten not only those who were attending the event, but also anyone who looked at his Facebook coverage of the event.

After all I have done to inform Cory Heidelberger about the truth, he ignores it as he pimps out his Lutheran wife, who is (along with Cory) indirectly receiving compensation from an organization that is financially benefitting from the Refugee Settlement federal money. That is allowing him the time to continue his Sharia affair with Taneezsa Islam, whose joint agenda is to denigrate those who are exposing the tactics of the Muslim Brotherhood. Time for Cory to end his Sharia affair that is partly fueled by the love of money, and end his crusade to silence those of us who have done their research after experiencing first hand the Civilizational Jihad that is occurring right here in South Dakota.

Time South Dakotans find out what Governor Daugaard, Cory Heidelberer and Taneeza Islam are trying to cover up

Cory Heidelberger puts out more smoke as Governor Daugaard and Taneeza Islam attack Neal Tapio for proposing a legislative group to study immigration and refugee resettlement in South Dakota:

Governor Dennis Daugaard says Tapio’s working group is “unnecessary” and calls out Tapio’s real motives:

Gov. Dennis Daugaard said the efforts to probe the state’s immigrant and refugee placement procedures weren’t needed.

“People that seize the refugee issue and try to paint it as a threatening immigrant issue misunderstand that situation,” Daugaard said. “I don’t think that’s necessary” [Dana Ferguson, “Neal Tapio Forms Panel to Assess Cost of Immigrants, Refugees to State,” that Sioux Falls paper, 2018.01.08].

South Dakota Voices for Peace says Tapio seems to have the same problem as his pal Donald Trump in understanding how government works...

and...

“Senator Tapio was not on a ‘listening tour’ through South Dakota, he was a sponsor of spreading xenophobia, Islamophobia and anti-immigrant and refugee bigotry across the state. Throughout 2017, Tapio endorsed speakers like Shahram Hadian and Trevor Loudon, who are identified hate speakers by various think tanks and organizations around the country,” said Taneeza Islam, Executive Director of SD Voices for Peace [links added; SDVP, 2018.01.08].

Here is the only place where I found that link that Cory attributes to SDVP, but Taneeza Islam is off topic as the issue is not about Muslims, refugees and immigration, as she again attacks an Arab American who committed the Sharia sin of converting from Muslim to Christian pastor. The specific issue is about the Refugee Resettlement Program.

So the issue that Daugaard, Heidelberger, and Taneeza does not want to talk about is "Refugee Resettlement and the Hijra to America":

We want to make it clear that we do not believe all refugees arriving in America are undeserving. The focus of our analysis is on the federal Refugee Resettlement Program and how it is being administered today with an eye to reforming it. It is critically important that it be administered with greater transparency than it has been to date---transparency for the US taxpayer and for the communities on the receiving end of the impact. Additionally, the numbers arriving and country of origin must be given greater scrutiny. Of course it is important that refugees are benefited from their opportunity to live in America, but of enormously greater consideration is whether the United States benefits from their presence.

So again this is not about Muslims, it is about the Muslim Brotherhood:

Islamic doctrine holds that Mohammed is the perfect Muslim and, therefore, that emulation of his life is evidence of the highest level of devotion for the faithful. According to the sacred texts and traditions of Islam, Mohammed left his home town of Mecca in the 7th Century and traveled with a small band of followers to the city of Yathrib (now Medina), in what has become known as the hijra (migration). He did so with intent of establishing a new base of operations from which to conquer and rule.

Hijra remains the model to this day for jihadists who seek to populate and dominate new lands. Their migrations are not for the purpose of assimilating peacefully in a new host nation, adopting as their own its traditions and legal systems. Rather, Mohammed’s followers, in keeping with the example established by their prophet, are driven first to colonize and then to transform non-Muslim target societies – whether through violent means or via stealthy, pre-violent ones favored by the Muslim Brotherhood when it is not powerful enough to use violence decisively.

Hijra forms a critical ingredient in what the Brotherhood calls its “civilization jihad.” As its 1991 strategic plan entitled The Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal of the Group in North America declares, the Brothers’ mission in America is to wage civilizational jihad so as to “destroy the Western civilization from within.” By aiming very explicitly at changing the demographics, legal systems and governments of such infidel states in an incremental process, the civilization jihadists advance their ultimate objective – global submission to shariah and the reestablishment of a caliphate to rule according to it.

Consequently, counterterrorism experts, other national security officials and politicians largely fixated on detecting and preventing attack from jihadist individuals or organizations are missing a no-less-important threat axis: the potential for subversion, as well as terrifying violence, from a Fifth Column in our country – fueled by rising numbers of immigrants, many of whom are brought here legally as refugees under America’s dysfunctional immigration system. These dangers cry out, among other things, for reform of our refugee and asylum practices.

Then we have the result of Taneeza Islam's work as activist for CAIR-MN:

One of the clearest examples of the jihad of Hijra advancing in America is happening in Minnesota where the original “seed community” first resettled in Minneapolis is spreading to suburbs such as Eden Prairie, but also to St. Cloud farther north, where demands are now being placed on those communities (most recently demonstrated by a plan for a large mosque and school complex in a residential neighborhood). The US State Department opened a resettlement office in St. Cloud through Lutheran Social Services about ten years ago, and then subsequently began resettling Somalis directly from Africa to St. Cloud. A Muslim community sprang up in similar fashion in Rochester, MN.

The departure of dozens of young Minneapolis Somalis to join the jihadists in Africa and the Middle East is, despite some wishful thinkers who want to believe it is because they don’t have enough jobs, ‘resources,’ and entertainment, is simply more evidence that Islamic indoctrination is going on in Minneapolis mosques.

In fact, a thorough study of the strategy unfolding in Minnesota would be of great value for confused citizens of other states who are just beginning to notice something happening, but holding the dangerously mistaken assumption that they are only disconnected events.

A study of Taneeza's work in Minnesota is exactly what she doesn't want done, as she attacks a Arab who converted to Christian pastor in order change the focus by playing the, "all Muslims are victims" lie. The Muslims that are the true victims are the ones being attacked for their decision to convert from Muslim to Christian, and willing to tell others why they did. Again, Muslims are not the problem. Islamist supremacists of the Muslim Brotherhood operating in stealth fashion are a huge problem.

 

Taneeza Islam to lead the Interfaith Jihad in Pierre

I just put up a post on the Interfaith event to be held in Pierre this Wednesday when I got an email saying none other than Taneeza Islam with lead the Jihadi cause:

Ladies and gentleman, a time for action is come. This year's edition of "Interfaith Day," at the state capitol in Pierre, South Dakota includes an invitation for a formal Muslim prayer inside the capitol rotunda as part of what's being billed as an ecumenical interfaith prayer observance this coming Wednesday, January 10th at 9:30 am CST. 

The invited representative of the Muslim faith is one Taneeza Islam, previously an employed representative of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an organization doing their level best to market a deliberately apostate and santized version of the Islamic faith that bears no resemblance to the violence and intolerance found within the literal pages of the Quran, the holy text of their prophet Mohammed. 

It should be understood clearly that CAIR is a purely political rather than religious organization with publicly stated goals and objectives including the abolition of the Jewish state of Israel and the establishment of a Palestinian state along with the subjugation of the U.S. Constitution for the allowance of practiced Sharia law on American soil. 

In light of this clear incompatibility with the U.S. Constitution and lack of willingness to disavow known terrorist groups like Hammas, Hezbollah, ISIS and the sponsorship of state sanctioned terrorism by muslim nations around the world, we are issuing this call for any and all Christians to come to Pierre this Wednesday and stand together in the capitol rotunda and collectively turn our backs on an organization that shares the same jihadist vision for the advancement of Islam that is presently destroying the peace and safety of dissenting faith communities and cultures around the world. 

Whereas:

We believe that Jesus Christ alone is the one and only Son of the most high God, 

We believe there to be no compatibility or agreement whatsoever between the faithful practice of Islam and that of Christianity, or in the devoted practice of their written texts which demand very different things from those followers sworn to faithfully live out, with fullest devotion, the literal and liturgical doctrines that define these two faiths, 

We believe that the United States of America was founded to welcome only citizens willing to honor and extend equal charity, goodness, kindness and peaceful tolerance to all men and women, regardless of faith and to pledge allegiance and loyalty to the United States Constitution which guarantees religious freedom and freedom from violence to all peoples, 

We believe CAIR, (Council on American Islamic Relations) to have repeatedly and willfully misrepresented the true face of Islam and to be fully engaged in a deception meant to allow further manipulation, incursion and ultimate endangerment of the American people through a conspiracy of deception and an embraced falsity which is commanded clearly in the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya, 

We would ask all men and women of Christian faith to gather in the Capitol rotunda in Pierre on Wednesday, January 10th to protest what we believe to be an inappropriate inclusion of an organization presently working to undermine the sovereignty of the United States of America, our Constitution and the peace and safety guaranteed forthwith.