As I already reported, Robert Spencer went after the Argus Leader reporter for biased coverage on the immigration issue. Here is how the Argus Leader report started:
Sioux Falls mayoral candidate is taking some heat for posts on his personal social media profile that equal rights advocates say are anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim.
Mike Gunn, a retired business owner and a dark horse in the 2018 Sioux Falls mayoral race, drew attention from the nonprofit South Dakota Voices for Justice for a series of Facebook posts expressing support for tighter immigration laws and alarmism over the country’s increasing Muslim population.
“It should alarm all citizens of Sioux Falls to see that kind of propaganda being released or reposted by someone who wants to be the top-elected official for the city,” said Taneeza Islam, a Sioux Falls immigration lawyer and executive director of South Dakota Voices for Justice.
Mike Gunn made this point:
I believe that if I were an American born citizen, the initial outcome on the accusation would hit a bit harder. But one key factor that left a whole in Tanzeea's remarks was that I was in fact a 1st generation Legal immigrant. I was vetted in "1970" migrated from Germany with my Mother and adoptive Father in the military at that time. It is true that I am against anyone who violates my as well as any other Citizens rights as well as the Constitution as it is written. But an even deeper expectation is to follow Our Laws as I did. I believe that I have just as much right possibly a bit more "experiencing" the vetting process by law to demand others do the same. No exception. During all this accusation process by Taneeza, everyone should consider another important fact ( I was vetted again in "2013").
If you are white, you have to follow immigration laws. But according to an Islamist immigration attorney, Muslim have religious rights and are abused by American immigration rules and regulations, and those American immigrants who want them strengthened for their own protection. Certainly does not seem like the "executive director of South Dakota Voices for Justice" is much into "equal justice". Instead she is an Islamist promoting Muslim Supremacy:
With Islamist terror attacks becoming commonplace in Europe and authorities across the continent doing very little to prevent them, it’s clear that the Trump administration’s tough approach to handling the threat of Islamist terror attacks is necessary.
It’s time Americans call these terror attacks what they really are — actions in support of an ideology that holds Islam and sharia above all else. In other words Muslim supremacy.
The mainstream media is currently on a mission to paint anyone on the right as a white supremacist. Most recently, popular comedian Chelsea Handler has even gone so far as to label Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson, former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, and actress Stacey Dash as “black white supremacists.”
The left and media are celebrating Handler’s disrespectful and downright bizarre label she cast on people of color who have nothing do with white supremacy at all, yet myself and other conservative writers and activists catch heat when we are critical of Islamist culture.
Why is it acceptable to throw the “white supremacist” label around but it is unacceptable to discuss issues related to Muslim supremacy and Islamist ideologies?
A few days ago, disturbing evidence of Muslim supremacy in the U.S. came out of the Alton Nolen trial in Oklahoma. Nolen is facing the death penalty for the 2014 beheading of his female co-worker at Vaughan Foods, after an argument over Nolen’s hatred of white people turned deadly.
Recent reports note that Nolen felt “oppressed” as a Muslim, and when police asked if he regretted what he had done, he said, “I don’t feel regret, because you know what I’ve done. That’s probably going to make Vaughan Foods a better place to work for a Muslim.”
The 54-year-old victim, Colleen Hufford, was silenced forever; not only did she lose her life, but her First Amendment right was stolen from her by a Muslim supremacist.
Muslim supremacy is not acceptable, and must be held to the same standard as white supremacy, black supremacy and any other supremacy.
[And, most importantly:]
It’s important not to confuse calling out the existence of Muslim supremacy with putting down Muslims. There are millions of Muslims around the globe that do not subscribe to Islamist ideologies.
That does not diminish the threat Muslim supremacy and Islamist ideologies pose, especially in the U.K. and across Europe; both have seen massive influx of Islamic immigration.
Mike Gunn's home country of Germany certainly has been a target for Islamic Jihad. I suppose Gunn, unlike the lady in Oklahoma, should be grateful that he got to keep his head after voicing his concerns. But South Dakota should not allow an Islamist, along with South Dakota's media and so-called social justice warriors, to promote Muslim Supremacy that will in the long run put "Islam and sharia above all else" to go unchallenged. It is not too soon for us to speak up and expose the real agenda of Taneeza Islam, which is importing CAIR-MN's jihad to South Dakota. Whenever you get the chance, ask her to denounce the anti-Semitic Hamas. Follow up with, isn't CAIR really the Hamas of America? Just make sure you have the research with you, and know what you are talking about. And don't let the conversation switch from Islamic Jihad to what is called terrorism, in all its forms.
CAIR is Hamas - see the link below:
https://www.understandingthethreat.com/cair-is-hamas-2/
BTW if you follow #sdleg on Twitter it becomes abundantly clear that the Argus Leader & the SD ACLU are very close to Taneeza Islam. Both entities seem to just parrot whatever Taneeza says & are obviously supportive of her.
Posted by: JimHoliway | February 15, 2018 at 09:28 AM
Listened to Mr. Gunn's interview on Kelo online, he was well-spoken with a plan residents should hear more about. Citizen's being taxed for services they're not receiving and the peoples' voices matter most.
Who is this Taneeza? Why is she here telling life-long residents who we can and can't support, what we can and can't say and who's allowed to come to our city and hold an event? The Argus should be ashamed for not printing the truth, but spinning the narrative with an attempt to slander someone.
Thanks for exposing Taneeza for who she is and the Argus's agenda. Jim, I've seen others talk about the connections between the Argus and Taneeza, not so much a secret anymore.
Posted by: KM | February 16, 2018 at 07:18 AM