Sibby Online

The latest legal ruling challenging CAIR's anti-Islamophobia curriculum

Here is a little background on what happened last year in San Deigo:

Last night, San Diego Unified School District’s (SDUSD) Board of Education overturned its “anti-Islamophobia” bullying prevention initiative and adopted a new program entitled “No Place for Hate,” which was developed by the Anti-Defamation League and will focus on protecting students of all religious beliefs. In addition, the Board voted to back away from another formal partnership with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). The Board’s reversal is a response to a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF) on behalf of five families and two organization that challenged the initiative’s constitutionality.

On April 5, 2017, the Board approved an Anti-Islamophobia initiative purportedly to combat the bullying of Muslim students. Among other benefits, the initiative instructed teachers and staff to promote Muslim culture, create safe spaces for Muslim students, and vet and revise curricula to ensure a more “positive” and “inclusive” portrayal of Islam. In addition, the initiative sought to formalize SDUSD’s longtime collaboration with CAIR, and it authorized the group to provide training materials, teach students about Islam during class time, and pass out religious materials.

On April 27, Charles LiMandri, FCDF President & Chief Counsel, emailed a detailed, three-page letter to each SDUSD board member and Superintendent Marten, informing them that the initiative, when implemented, would “likely violate the U.S. Constitution, and consequently would invite time-consuming and expensive legal challenges.” LiMandri recommended that the Board rescind the anti-Islamophobia initiative and pursue an anti-bullying measure that protected students of all religions.

SDUSD officials did not respond to the letter, nor did they rescind the policy at either of the two board meetings that were held prior to the filing of the original complaint on May 22, 2017. On June 28, FCDF filed an amended complaint adding additional state law claims, including violations of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act and several provisions of the California Education Code.

Here is the latest ruling by the District Court:

A federal judge partially granted a motion Monday by San Diego's Unified School District (SDUSD) to strike references to the Council on American Islamic Relations' (CAIR) ties to Hamas from a lawsuit seeking to block the school system from working with CAIR.

The Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund's (FCDF) claims the school district violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, the Equal Protection Clause of the 14^th Amendment and California law by enacting a CAIR supported anti-Islamophobia/anti-bullying program last spring.

Mentioning CAIR's Hamas ties in the litigation was "impertinent, immaterial and scandalous," school district officials claimed in December. Including references to CAIR's Hamas connection and the fact some of its officials had been convicted on terrorism charges is intended to "inflame the public."

Court evidence from a terror-financing trial show that CAIR was formed by Muslim Brotherhood officials to serve a Hamas-support network operating in the United States during the 1990s. The FBI cut off non-investigative contact with CAIR in 2008, explaining that, "until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS, the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner."

The policy remains in effect.

This is relevant because CAIR has made "prioritized public schools as ground zero to advance its religious mission," the FCDF argued, saying it matters because the school district gave "a divisive religious group ... unprecedented decision-making authority" in a public school program.

The judge disagreed.

"Given the lack of pertinences or materiality to this case, their inclusion ... is likely intended to 'besmirch' Defendants and cast them in a derogatory light based on SDUSD's relationship with CAIR," wrote U.S. District Judge Cynthia Bashant.

CAIR's relationship with Hamas, "whether true or not," predates its work with the school district and is "superfluous historical allegations that should be stricken," she ruled.

The judge preserved provisions in FCDF's amended complaint relating to CAIR's hostility to Israel and allegations it "promotes discriminatory bias against non-Muslim students on the basis of their religion." While they may be "distasteful" and "unsavory," those provisions could call into question the "objectivity and accuracy" of CAIR-provided instructional materials.

First I would like to remind readers that Islamophobia is a modern term for the Quranic phrase "Fitnah", making the anti-Islamophobia curriculum a violation of the Establishment Clause.

Last night I read this from page 91 of Paul Sperry's, "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington":

Investigators compare it to the Mafia, the secret Sicilian society. In fact, Mafia comes from the Arabic word maehfil meaning union. Like mobsters, the Muslim Brothers operate a secret underworld of illegal activities conducted under the cover of fronts with legitimate-sounding names. THey launder money through constructions companies like BMI Inc. and tax-exempt charities like Happy Hearts Trust. [Note Taneeza Islam set up the non-profit "South Dakota Voices for Peance and Justice"]

Theirs is a highly organized and self-contained world, or underworld, according to investigators. The brothers have their own AFL-CIO; it's called ISNA. They have their own American Bar Association; it's called the Fiqh Council. They have their own VFW; it's called the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council. They have their own NAACP; it's called CAIR....Their NEA is the Council on Islamic Education...

But the ummah underworld is harder to penetrate, investigators says, because it is shrouded by a major religion. Fearing accusations of religions bigotry, Washington is still reluctant to aggressively prosecute it.

Interesting how CAIR wants to have their cake and eat it too. They want to be a protected religion, but then they want their religious doctrine of "Fitnah" to be established in our public schools under the guise of anti-Islamophobia bullying, while they bully non-Muslims with their Islamophobia charges.

Second, the judge states that "history" has to be removed from this equation. Seems like the Muslim Brotherhood's plan to destroy America from within is well under way by removing history while replacing it with the Jihadi religion of Islam that does not allow critics of Islam. So therefore, those of us who insist on the truth are Islamophobes as the truth is not kind to Islam. There is no way for America to protect all religions if the supremacy of the Wahhabi version of Islam is allowed to be established in America, especially in our schools. South Dakota citizens need to be on the lookout for Islamic infiltration in our public schools. 

MInnesota Republican legislators proposing $18 million in Somalia community development funding

While Senator Tapio wants to study the financial costs to the taxpayers regarding the refugee resettlement program, Minnesota Republicans are pushing to give them $18 million:

Here are two salient sections from SF 1722, as introduced into the Minnesota State Senate. The chief author of this bill is Republican State Senator Jim Abeler; its other authors are Republican State Senators Jerry Relph and Carla J. Nelson, along with Democrat/Farmer-Labor State Senators Steve A. Cwodzinski and Kari Dziedzic.

Even though Abeler is listed as Chief Author of the bill, its likely driver is Nelson, who has a long record of pandering to the Somali community.

This bill is based on the false assumption that poverty causes terrorism, and thus showering money upon communities that produce many jihadis (and Minnesota’s Somali community is certainly in that category) will alleviate the problem. The idea that poverty and ignorance cause terrorism has led the U.S. to shower billions on Muslim countries, hoping to win hearts and minds and alleviate what mainstream analysts doggedly believe are the root causes of terrorism. But it has been known for years that poverty doesn’t really cause terrorism at all. The Economist reported in 2010: “Social scientists have collected a large amount of data on the socioeconomic background of terrorists. According to a 2008 survey of such studies by Alan Krueger of Princeton University, they have found little evidence that the typical terrorist is unusually poor or badly schooled.”

In the same vein, CNS News noted in September 2013: “According to a Rand Corporation report on counterterrorism, prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense in 2009, ‘Terrorists are not particularly impoverished, uneducated, or afflicted by mental disease. Demographically, their most important characteristic is normalcy (within their environment). Terrorist leaders actually tend to come from relatively privileged backgrounds.’ One of the authors of the RAND report, Darcy Noricks, also found that according to a number of academic studies, ‘Terrorists turn out to be more rather than less educated than the general population.'”

The Times Online reported the following as far back as April 2005: “Three-quarters of the Al-Qaeda members were from upper middle-class homes and many were married with children; 60% were college educated, often in Europe or the United States.”

And here we go again. If this bill is passed, money will be showered on worthless programs that won’t prevent a single Somali Muslim in Minnesota from joining the jihad.

While South Dakota Republicans hold their own forum, Ohio Democrats hold forum sponsored by Hamas-linked CAIR

While Cory Heidelberger moans about the Minnehaha County Republicans running their own legislative forum, Ohio Democrats jump into bed with Hamas-linked CAIR:

The Left’s normalizing of the Council on American-Islamic Relations is a principal sign of the myopia and short-sightedness of our age. And the Right is just as culpable, by never making this an issue. Every Republican candidate ought to make the appearance of these Democrat candidates at this CAIR forum an issue, a scandal, an outrage. But nary a one of them will do so. And why not?

The candidates who appeared, Richard Cordray, Joe Schiavoni, Dennis Kucinich, and Bill O’Neill, all should have refused CAIR’s invitation, and called on the others to do so. CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.

CAIR-Columbus page here.

 

Argus Leader taking heat from Jihad Watch after using Taneeza Islam to attack mayoral candidate Mike Gunn

The Argus Leader helped Taneeza Islam's Jihad along with “Mayoral hopeful criticized by equal rights advocates for politically charged Facebook posts,” by Joe Sneve:

 Sioux Falls mayoral candidate is taking some heat for posts on his personal social media profile that equal rights advocates say are anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim.Mike Gunn, a retired business owner and a dark horse in the 2018 Sioux Falls mayoral race, drew attention from the nonprofit South Dakota Voices for Justice for a series of Facebook posts expressing support for tighter immigration laws and alarmism over the country’s increasing Muslim population.

“It should alarm all citizens of Sioux Falls to see that kind of propaganda being released or reposted by someone who wants to be the top-elected official for the city,” said Taneeza Islam, a Sioux Falls immigration lawyer and executive director of South Dakota Voices for Justice.

Islam was specifically referring to a post shared Tuesday by Gunn from the Facebook page of Americans First, Task Force of Aberdeen SD, a self-described educational page that regularly shares memes and news stories critical of Islam.

The post in question included a story from the website JihadWatch.com stating the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is tied to terrorist organizations. Similar claims have been made by Republican and conservative office seekers throughout the country who site [sic] a Center for Security Policy report linking the organization to terrorist groups in the Middle East.

As I have already pointing out, being critical of Islam is a violation of Fitnah, or what is better known as Islamophobia.

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch responded with this:

The story below from the Argus Leader of Sioux Falls, South Dakota is a textbook example of how Leftist “journalists” present news articles designed to manipulate the public into holding the views they want them to hold. Argus Leader reporter Joe Sneve tells us that “Mike Gunn, a retired business owner and a dark horse in the 2018 Sioux Falls mayoral race, drew attention from the nonprofit South Dakota Voices for Justice for a series of Facebook posts expressing support for tighter immigration laws and alarmism over the country’s increasing Muslim population.”

So right off the bat, we have Mike Gunn against the South Dakota Voices for Justice, which sounds as if Gunn is against justice. The candidate’s crime was actually that he shared posts from “the Facebook page of Americans First, Task Force of Aberdeen SD, a self-described educational page that regularly shares memes and news stories critical of Islam.” It’s a “self-described” educational page, you see: Sneve is semaphoring that readers should approach this group with skepticism.

And what post did Gunn share? “The post in question included a story from the website JihadWatch.com stating the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is tied to terrorist organizations. Similar claims have been made by Republican and conservative office seekers throughout the country who site [sic] a Center for Security Policy report linking the organization to terrorist groups in the Middle East.”

This gives readers the impression that Jihad Watch and the Center for Security Policy are responsible for the claim that CAIR is tied to terrorist organizations. So I wrote to Joe Sneve and pointed out that it was not I who stated that CAIR was tied to terrorist organizations, but the Justice Department, and sent him this link to substantiate what I was saying. Sneve, however, wrote back saying that after consulting with his editor, they had decided not to change the wording of their story.

Sneve’s story then goes on to say: “But the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation, has repeatedly defended CAIR and says the Center for Security Policy is an anti-Muslim extremist group.”

In my email to Sneve, I also wrote: “I wonder if you are familiar with the charges that the Southern Poverty Law Center is not a neutral arbiter of what constitutes an ‘extremist’ group and what does not, but has been harshly and justifiably criticized for turning a blind eye to Islamist extremist groups such as CAIR while defaming legitimate conservative organizations with their ‘extremist’ label.” Sneve never responded to this. Note also that he describes the SPLC as “a nonprofit legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation.” In contrast to how he treated the Americans First group, Sneve slaps no “self-described” qualifier on his description of the SPLC, despite considerable evidence that it is not a neutral arbiter, but a hard-Left smear group that uses its “extremist” label to tar legitimate groups that oppose its Leftist agenda.

Sneve is no different from hordes of other establishment media self-described reporters, who treat Hamas-linked CAIR and the defamation factory SPLC as if they were reliable sources, and force conservatives such as Mike Gunn to defend themselves against their charges. In a sane world, Gunn would be lauded for his determination to defend the nation, and the story would be about Sneve and the Argus Leader, and their manipulative propaganda spin designed to intimidate and shame people such as Mike Gunn into being afraid to stand for the national defense. But you’re only going to read that here, on one of the Internet’s few and rapidly diminishing islands of sanity.

I then left this comment at the Jihad Watch post in order to provide more research on Taneeza Islam:

From the Argus report:

“Taneeza Islam, a Sioux Falls immigration lawyer and executive director of South Dakota Voices for Justice.”

Taneeza Islam worked for CAIR-MN as director of civil rights before moving to South Dakota. I asked her on November 28, 2017 if she would denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and their support of Hamas. I posted her response on my web site:

http://sibbyonline.blogs.com/sibbyonline/2017/12/taneeza-islam-refused-to-publically-denounce-the-muslim-brotherhood-and-its-support-of-terrorist-gro.html

Which brought this analysis:

So as the primary sponsor of the USD presentation announced there was time for one more question I raised my hand and asked:

“So as we talk about the evolution of Sharia, there are members of a group called the Muslim Brotherhood who argue we are going too far away from the foundational belief system of Muhammed, and they want to restore that and actually implement full Sharia, establish a caliphate and implement full blown worldwide Sharia Law. And do you denounce the Muslim Brotherhood for that position and their support of Hamas.”

Taneeza’s response:

“I denounce terrorism in all its forms. I don’t know what your definition of Sharia is, but my definition of Sharia does not match up with your question. So we need to back up and talk outside about what Sharia is, because that was the whole point of that slide, was to tell you that what the average person understand about Sharia is not in fact what it is. Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas…(she hesitated, giggled, hesitated)…there are generations of history that go into these organizations, Why they were formulated and why they exist. There is political parties, there is military, there is a whole bunch of stuff that cannot be answered in one minute. So I am going to prefer to talk to you off line.””

You know you have found a live wire when you get this reaction about condemning terrorism in all its forms.

And...

‘…You know you have found a live wire…’

Spot on, livingengine. Standard operating procedure. Divert, distract, deflect, dissemble – and deceive.

And...

“I denounce terrorism in all its forms.”

Substituting “terrorism” for “violent jihad” is a semantics game.

But, as she’s not being asked to denounce violent jihad…..

Denouncing Islam it all of its forms has also been used by high ranking Muslim Brotherhood operates. In Paul Sperry's,"Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington", we find this from founder of CAIR Omar Ahmad:

He was one of the Muslim leaders invited by the president to the National Cathedral to join the nation in mourning the 9/11 tragedy, Shortly after the attacks, he proclaimed that Muslims condemn "terrorism in all its forms".

That was on page 23. On page 30 we have this coverage of convicted terrorist and founder of the American Muslim Council, Abdurahman Alamoudi:

Whenever Muslim Leaders are asked to condemn violent attacks on non-Muslims they sternly denounce "all forms of terrorism," while pointing out that Islam forbids terrorism and any violence against "innocent" people or "civilians." "We are against all forms of terrorism," Alamoundi said after 1998's U.S. embassy bombings. "Our religion is against terrorism." Technically they are right. Such statements are accurate.

But like Ali's response to his inquisitors, they are cleverly worded dodges. You see, Islamists do not consider all non-Muslims as "innocent" or "civilians." And what the West defines as "terrorism," they may define as "legitimate resistance" or "justice." What the West defines as "terrorists," they may define as Israeli and American "occupiers" or "oppressors." So their statements against terrorism and terrorists are really nothing more than legal lies. It all depends on what their meaning is. (Imagine if Bill Clinton were Muslim!) At the same time Alamoundi publically condemned the embassy "terrorism" in Africa, he privately expressed disappointment in the low American death toll.

According to Sperry (page 27), "British authorities busted Alamoundi" and "Alamoudi eventually pleaded guilty to plotting terroists acts with Libya. Prosecutors also connected him to Hamas..." Sperry quoted CAIR founder Omar Ahmad on page 24:

Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith but to become dominant. The Quran should be the highest authority in ASmerica, and Islam the only accepted reigion on Earth.

Again I point out that Taneeza Islam worked for CAIR-MN and she has publically refused to denounce Hamas and instead said, “I denounce terrorism in all its forms." South Dakota beware!

Why did Taneeza Islam change her propaganda program from "Peace" to "Justice"?

Taneeza Islam created "South Dakota Voices for Peace". She has now made a change:

“Our mission is to empower South Dakotans to fight Islamophobia and immigrant/refugee bigotry,” said Taneeza Islam, executive director of South Dakota Voices for Justice. “The amount of community engagement – South Dakotans calling and emailing their senators to vote no on SCR 13 – has been truly inspiring. We won yesterday by a slight margin, 16-19, but we know our work is far from finished. We will continue to educate legislators on the blatant falsities included in legislation/resolutions which perpetuate dehumanizing propaganda about South Dakota’s Muslim, immigrants and refugees.”

Why the change to "Justice?" Paul Perry's, "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington" provides a possible motive:

A full chapter of this section will be devoted to the Muslim art of telling "white lies" to defend the faith and further the cause of Allah, as instructed in the hadiths, the sacred supplements to the Quran. The Muslim establishment plays an elaborate word game. It is easy to be fooled by such duplicity, so I have provided readers with intellectual tools to easily identify it.

For example, many Muslim leaders in America when asked to condemn terrorist acts sternly argue the Quran forbids terrorism, which they define as the "murder of innocent civilians." Such statements generally assuage skeptics. But they are disingenuous, so orthodox Muslims do not consider Jews and Christians necessarily to be "innocent." Nor do they view Israelis and Westerners necessarily as "civilians" just because they do not wear uniforms. And what the public recognizes as "murder" they may recognize as "justice." So you have to be carefully parse what they say.

From Wiki:

Qiṣāṣ is an Islamic term meaning "retaliation in kind" or "revenge",^[1][2] "eye for an eye", "nemesis" or retributive justice. It is a category of crimes in Islamic jurisprudence, where Sharia allows equal retaliation as the punishment. Qisas principle is available against the accused, to the victim or victim's heirs, when a Muslim is murdered, suffers bodily injury or suffers property damage. In the case of murder, Qisas means the right of a murder victim's nearest relative or Wali (legal guardian) to, if the court approves, take the life of the killer.

Qisas is one of several forms of punishment in Islamic Penal Law, others being Hudud, Diyya and Ta'zir.

The Qisas or equivalence verse in Quran is,^[1]

O ye who believe! the law of equality is prescribed to you in cases of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, the woman for the woman. But if any remission is made by the brother of the slain, then grant any reasonable demand, and compensate him with handsome gratitude, this is a concession and a Mercy from your Lord. After this whoever exceeds the limits shall be in grave penalty.

— Quran 2:178

The Hadiths have extensive discussion of qisas. For example, Sahih Bukhari states,

Allah's Apostle said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims."

— Sahih al-Bukhari, 9:83:17

Narrated Anas: The daughter of An-Nadr slapped a girl and broke her incisor tooth. They (the relatives of that girl), came to the Prophet and he gave the order of Qisas (equality in punishment).

— Sahih al-Bukhari, 9:83:32

Qisas system of punishment is prescribed in Quran and Hadiths to any case of unnatural death (murder, manslaughter), bodily injury or aggravated assault suffered by a Muslim.^[6] However, in the history of Islam, many premodern Islamic scholars ruled that Qisas did not apply when the victim was a non-Muslim dhimmi and to non-Muslim slaves owned by a Muslim.

Not exactly the kind of equality liberals would support, unless they are fooled into it by wordsmith artists.

Again, note that Taneeza Islam refused to denounce the Muslim Brotherhood and its support of Hamas. South Dakotans beware, as Hamas does not have a good reputation when it comes to justice:

JERUSALEM (CNN) -- A human rights watchdog has documented "serious abuses" in the criminal justice system of Hamas, the political movement that runs the Palestinian territory of Gaza.

A 43-page Human Rights Watch report notes arbitrary arrests, incommunicado detentions, torture and unfair trials in the territory since Hamas took control in 2007.

"After five years of Hamas rule in Gaza, its criminal justice system reeks of injustice, routinely violates detainees' rights, and grants impunity to abusive security services," Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director for Human Rights Watch, said in an online posting Wednesday. "Hamas should stop the kinds of abuses that Egyptians, Syrians, and others in the region have risked their lives to bring to an end."

What many don't know is that CAIR is Hamas. Taneeza Islam worked as so-called civil rights Director for CAIR-MN. Check this out:

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is a notorious neo-Jihadi group in the United States that masquerades as a civil rights organization. 

In truth, the group cares very little about true civil rights or religious freedom outside the practice of Islam.  CAIR famously complains about petty slights to Muslim-Americans while ignoring far more serious human rights violations against non-Muslims in the Islamic world.

CAIR's true interest is the advancement of Islam, which its leaders feel is best pursued by pulling Muslim-Americans into a disaffected bloc, thereby maximizing political power - but at the expense of the very assimilation which has helped Muslim individuals become successful in the United States.  In other words, if CAIR gets what it wants, it's bad for everyone.

10 Facts About CAIR:

• CAIR was created by the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamic supremacist organization that pioneered 20th century Islamic terrorism and sanctions violence against civilians.
   
• CAIR only has about 5,000 members, despite a membership fee of just $10.
   
• CAIR represents the opinions of only 12% of Muslim-Americans according to Gallup.
  
  
• CAIR receives financial support from foreign powers who have also provided direct support to Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda and Hamas.
  
  
• CAIR has solicited money from sponsors of terror and received financial support from convicted terrorists.
  
  
• CAIR founders have praised terrorists to Muslim audiences and said that suicide bombers are acting on behalf of Islam.
  
  
• CAIR has raised funds for terrorists under the guise of helping 9/11 victims.
  
  
• CAIR board members have called for the overthrow of the United States and the imposition of Islamic law.  CAIR has suggested applying Sharia punishment (ie. the death penalty) to users who criticize Islam on the Internet. 
  
  
• At least 15 high-level CAIR staff members have been under federal investigation for ties to Islamic terror.
  
  
• CAIR has discouraged Muslim-Americans from cooperating with law enforcement and has spent more time and money advocating on behalf of convicted terrorists than for their victims.

You will not find those facts disclosed by South Dakota's mainstream media, nor liberal bloggers.

Cory Heidelberger makes a racist charge that "White Pride" is immoral, but "Black Pride" is not, leading to Islamic terrorism becoming a moral act

Yesterday's quote of the day is a comment made by Cory Heidelberger:

For centuries, the oppressor class has scorned blacks, Indians, Chinese, etc. for something over which those minorities have no control (as silly as taking pride in innate characteristics). The racial-pride responses from the oppressed classes aren’t really saying, “I’m proud of my genetics!” but are countering the racist message and saying, “I don’t have to be ashamed of my genetics. I don’t have to take a back seat [literally!] because of my genetics.”Viewed in that light, “White Pride” thus becomes absurd. “White Pride” is the peevish response of white racists losing their oppressor privilege.

Thus, in our cultural context, a white man shouting “White Pride!” is immoral while a black man shouting “Black Pride!” is not.

So much for the idea that so-called progressives are supporting equality.

Islamic Fitnah is also based on being an oppressed minority and justifies Jihad. This is what is being promoted by some Muslims:

Praise be to Allaah.  

Allaah has enjoined jihad for His sake upon the Muslims, for the great benefits that result from that and because of the harm caused by abandoning jihad, some of which are mentioned in Question no. 34830. 

Some of the reasons why jihad for the sake of Allaah is prescribed in Islam are as follows: 

3 – Removing fitnah (tribulation) 

Fitnah is of different types: 

(i)                That which is caused by the kuffaar who persecute the Muslims or apply pressure to them to make them give up their religion. Allaah has commanded the Muslims to fight in jihad in order to save those who are weak and oppressed. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“And what is wrong with you that you fight not in the Cause of Allaah, and for those weak, ill-treated and oppressed among men, women, and children, whose cry is: “Our Lord! Rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from You one who will protect, and raise for us from You one who will help”

[al-Nisa’ 4:75] 

So based On Cory's illogical argument, Islamic terrorism is a moral act as it is a response by a minority group who believe their are being oppressed by Islamophobes, which is just a modern term for fitnah. Taneeza Islam made that victimhood argument in response to a Shahram Hadian, a Muslim who converted to Christianity:

In February, Haidan’s ministry was listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate group activity in the U.S.

Taneeza Islam, a local immigration lawyer and organizer for the local Muslim community, mentioned the upcoming talk during a panel on hate crimes Thursday at the downtown library in Sioux Falls.

She cited speakers like Howse and Hadian as part of a prejudicial undercurrent that inspires fear among ethnic minorities nationwide. In Sioux Falls, that fear has grown in recent years.

The SPL Center’s website saw the number of hate groups listed as “anti-Muslim” jump from 34 in 2015 to 101 in 2016.

“Even though there haven’t been violent crimes in our area, the fear is there,” Islam said.

Islam said she’s pressed the Hilton Garden Inn South on whether their event policy excludes hate speech and hasn’t heard from them.

So because Taneeza is part of a minority, she can be in fear of becoming a victim of violent crimes, but those exposing the root cause of Islamic terrorism are "Islamophobes"? Tanneza's and Cory's illogical arguments are part of the fraud that was described in the preface of Paul Sperry's, Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington:

Infiltration, at bottom, is a story of mass deception. A disturbing tale of how the American people have been played for fools, victims of an elaborate fraud orchestrated by the "mainstream" Muslim establishment to protect a faith from due scrutiny, while concealing an underworld that secretly plots to infiltrate and overturn the American system of government.

Exposing the fraud requires revealing unpleasant truths. Not just about respected Muslim leaders who use mosques, charities and other nonprofit groups as cover to support terrorist activities, but also popular political figures in Washington from both parties who protect them, even helping them place agents of influence inside the government. 

Senator Neal Tapio is trying to expose this fraud in South Dakota. He needs our support as the leftists of the Democratic party has joined forces with the liberal crony capitalists of the Republican party to prevent the truth from being told. That is the makeup of the 19 Senators who voted against his concurrent resolution, that provoked Cory Heidleberger's racist comment. Cory's goal is not equality, his mission is to become the oppressor y convincing people that they are victims and then promoting hatred toward what they call the oppressors. This is right out of the books of the cultural Neo-Marxist Frankfurt School, and also the books of Islam.

Minnesota Lutherans in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood, as Cory Heidelberger's wife continues to make money as a Lutheran pastor

Minnesota Lutherans show their lack of discernment:

CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.

Would Bethany Lutheran Church, blithely indifferent to all that as it is, offer office space to a group that had, say, been defamed by the hard-Left Southern Poverty Law Center? Not on your life! But Hamas? Fine!

Here is the mainstream media report:

CAIR held an open house last week to celebrate its new office in Bethany Lutheran Church in Minneapolis’ Seward neighborhood, a location that offers more space, is closer to clients and, CAIR staff members hope, serves as a sanctuary.

The alliance comes amid heightened fear and uncertainty for local Muslims, as hate crimes against them rise. On Friday, President Donald Trump issued an order temporarily barring refugees from entering the country. Officials with the civil rights organization and the church hope they can work together to undercut discrimination.

“These are our allies,” said Hussein, CAIR’s local executive director. “These are the people that stood with us when we were challenging Islamophobia.”

The Rev. Mike Matson, pastor of Bethany Lutheran Church, said the congregation has parishioners from across the political spectrum and strives to be open and “willing to come to the middle … where it’s messy, but safely and with integrity.” He said it’s unfortunate there is such anger and division in the country.

As I have been pointing out, Islamophobia is just another work of the Islamic principle of Fitnah. And this is how Islamists are to deal with those who violate Fitnah:

A jihadist who pleaded guilty to going on a stabbing spree at the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota entered the U.S. as a legal immigrant with foreign relatives.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed to Breitbart News in a statement that 20-year-old Mahad Abdiaziz Adbiraham entered the U.S. as a “derivative of a relative,” which is immigration lingo used to describe a foreign-born resident who came to the country either as the immediate child or spouse of a legal immigrant.

Adbiraham, according to KSTP, pleaded guilty last week to stabbing two men in a Macy’s dressing room at the Mall of America, an attack that the jihadist admitted in court was inspired by the Islamic State (ISIS).

In a statement to the courtroom, Adbiraham said the attack was a “call for jihad by the Chief of Believer, Abu-bakr Al-baghdadi, may Allah protect him, and by the Mujahiden of the Islamic State,” adding: “I understand that the two men I stabbed know and have explained the reason for my attack, and I am here reaffirming that it was indeed an act of Jihad in the way of Allah.”

The Mall of America jihadist also threatened Americans, saying in the statement that the country would not be considered safe until its “war with Islam” ended.

Here is Cory Heidelberger's response to Senator Neal Tapio's attempt to bring this problem to the attention of South Dakota Legislators:

1. Justin Cronin
2. Bob Ewing
3. Jason Frerichs
4. Terri Haverly
5. Troy Heinert
6. Craig Kennedy
7. Kevin Killer
8. Jack Kolbeck
9. Kris Langer
10. Reynold Nesiba
11. Ernie Otten
12. Jeff Partridge
13. Deb Peters
14. Arthur Rusch
15. Deb Soholt
16. Alan Solano
17. Billie Sutton
18. Larry Tidemann
19. Jim White

Those nineteen Senators voted against Senator Tapio’s Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, his latest abuse of the Legislative process to generate campaign propaganda for himself and his vile Trumpism. Before this afternoon’s debate, Tapio’s Congressional campaign released a statement declaring “anyone, any organization, business or political candidate who fails to support the resolution is by omission declaring themselves an apologist for radical Islam, an enemy of the state.”

Even Greg Belfrage thinks Tapio’s fascist rhetoric deserves a one-word response: “Nuts!”

And...

Tapio’s willingness to use the vile tactic of labeling people who disagree with him “enemies of the state” (yes, this should sound disgustingly familiar) tempts me to rally all of my fellow patriotic “enemies of the state” to call and e-mail to stiffen the spines of our 19 sensible Senators.

What Cory doesn't mention is there were 16 Senators who voted for the resolution. Cory considers them fascists? Another thing Cory fails to mention is his wife makes money as a Lutheran pastor. LSS gets taxpayers money to bring the type of people into America who are carrying out Jihad because America is at war with Islam. Cory has a financial conflict of interest on this issue. Leo Hohman tells us what Cory is protecting:

And now Somali crime is starting to leak across the border from Minnesota into South Dakota.

Lutheran Social Services, which operates a refugee resettlement office in Sioux Falls, has offloaded more than 4,500 Somalis over the last decade.

But many of the Somalis resettled originally in Sioux Falls migrate to Aberdeen in search of work at Demkota Ranch Co., which runs a beef packing plant in the city. The latest group of approximately 50 Somalis arrived in Aberdeen on a bus in December, sources in the community told LeoHohmann.com.

South Dakotans are beginning to get a taste of the crime that has plagued Minnesota.

A Somali refugee was convicted last year for trying to sexually assault a wheelchair-bound mentally disabled woman at a group home in Aberdeen. Liban Mohamed, 39, had been in Aberdeen only a few days when he wandered away from the White House Inn, where he was living while hoping to land a job at the beef plant, and found the vulnerable woman sitting outside the group home. If a caretaker had not walked up and seen him with his hand reaching between the woman’s legs, there is no telling what he was planning to do next.

There have also been several shootings by Somalis in South Dakota.

In the summer of 2016, two Aberdeen men were shot at, one hit and wounded, in the street outside the Foxridge Apartments. The alleged shooter was Abdirhman Ahmad Noor, 24, who walked up to the injured man lying in the street and shot him a second time in the head. He miraculously survived, but Noor, who came to the U.S. as a child refugee, was charged with attempted murder and released on $50,000 bail. He never showed up for his March 2017 court hearing. Noor remains unaccounted for to this day.

South Dakota State Senator and GOP congressional candidate Neal Tapio is leading perhaps the nation’s most aggressive fight to expose the fraud of Islamic refugee resettlements from Somalia and other jihadist hotbeds. Tapio has introduced a series of bills and resolutions that seeks to end high-risk resettlements in his state.

“While many people see compassion to serve the less fortunate, the truth is the Somali community has not been able to assimilate and has proven to be a major terror threat in the United States,” Tapio said.

“Together with nebulous forces in the multinational meatpacking corporations, resettlement agencies and anti-American Islamic organizations with ties to terrorist networks, the Muslim Brotherhood, along with willing accomplices in the media, these policies to force relocation of proven subscribers to Islamic fundamentalism need to be exposed and crushed,” Tapio added.

What most Americans don't understand is that the Muslim Brotherhood is at war with America as they consider us their enemy. I have warned Cory about the Muslim Brotherhood and Taneeza Islam's involvement with their front groups, including CAIR-MN, but apparently money is more important to him than having a truthful discussion on this issue. And speaking of fascists, I am still banned from speaking at Dakota Free Press. That way he can continue to use vile tactics, unchecked, to fuel hatred at those he disagrees with.

Cory has sided with those  who are involved with furthering the anti-Semitic agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood, who now calls America their enemy. And Hitler was a leader of anti-Semitism and helped trained the Muslim Brotherhood. Cory again has it backwards. When he starts yelling "fascist", he needs to say it into a mirror. Cory is the one who has sided with those who hate Jews, along with anyone else who doesn't worship Allah. Sounds like the definition of bigotry.

A warning to the interfaith movement in regard to Islamic intolerance

When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks…” (Qur’an 47:4)

“And do not marry polytheistic women until they believe. And a believing slave woman is better than a polytheist, even though she might please you. And do not marry polytheistic men until they believe. And a believing slave is better than a polytheist, even though he might please you. Those invite to the Fire, but Allah invites to Paradise and to forgiveness, by His permission. And He makes clear His verses to the people that perhaps they may remember.” (Qur’an 2:221)

So we have this sad story from New Delhi:

Three people have been arrested and a minor detained for the murder of a 23-year-old photographer Ankit Saxena, killed allegedly by the family of his Muslim girlfriend in west Delhi. Ankit was attacked on a street near his home on Thursday night and was stabbed in the neck, the police said.

The police arrested the mother and uncle of Ankit’s girlfriend and detained her 14-year-old brother. The mother and uncle of Ankit’s girlfriend were arrested from the site of the murder, while her father and younger brother were taken into custody by the police from their house later.

Ankit was dating the 20-year-old second-year college student for the past three years. The police said her family was opposed to the relationship because Ankit was a Hindu.

There is heavy police deployment in Raghubir Nagar, the area where Ankit was killed. Police said the stepped-up security is a precautionary measure.

At around 9 pm on Thursday, he was beaten and then was stabbed with a knife. The road was full of blood where he collapsed. Ankit’s mother reportedly ran out of her home when she was told that he was being attacked. She has told the police that she saw the woman’s father stabbing her son.

Ankit’s father Yashpal Saxena said, “They caught hold of my son and the girl’s father slit my son’s throat. Blood spilled all over and within two seconds everything was over.”

The young woman has said Ankit and she planned to get married soon. “I was going to meet him and then someone told me he had been stabbed with a knife. We were going to marry. He called me and told me he wanted to marry me, so we were meeting,” she told reporters.

The two began dating when they were neighbours a few years ago. They continued the relationship even after her family moved away.

“During the investigation, we found that they caught and stabbed Ankit in the neck. The woman’s family was against their relationship as they belonged to different communities and had warned Ankit against associating with her,” senior police officer Vijay Kumar said.

The young woman, who the police say is in a state of shock, is with the cops right now for safety reasons. The police said she will be produced before the Child Welfare Committee so that a decision could be taken where she will stay. She had told reporters that she was “scared of her family”.

Inspiration for violence go back to Muhammad:

Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina. Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that was sent to take revenge for Muhammad's deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as "same day marriage").

One of Islam's most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: "In the Jihad which you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is invading other [countries] in order to spread the word of Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way." Elsewhere, he notes: "Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it attacks institutions and traditions to release human beings from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the 'homeland of Islam' diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life."

The widely respected Dictionary of Islam defines Jihad as "A religious war with those who are unbelievers in the mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Quran and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoting from the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], "The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect."

Here is more on Yusuf al-Qaradawi:

Yusuf al-Qaradawi is an Egyptian Islamic scholar associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. He is known for his militant religious rulings and political commentary in support of acts of terrorism and repression of women. He is currently the host of Al Jazeera's most popular show, "Shariah and Life," and, largely because of this, has become a very influential force among Muslims worldwide. Al-Qaradawi also serves as chairman of the board of trustees at the Islamic American University, a subsidiary of the Muslim American Society.

Al-Qaradawi's fatwas, or religious edicts, have been numerous and far-reaching. Topics that have been influenced by al-Qaradawi's religious interpretation range from "justified" killings, to familial affairs and domestic conflict. Additionally, al-Qaradawi has made a number of public speaking appearances, both in the U.S. and abroad, where he has further expounded his often contentious doctrine.

In 1995, at a conference held by the Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA) in Toledo, Ohio, al-Qaradawi said, "Our brothers in Hamas, in Palestine, the Islamic resistance, the Islamic Jihad, after all the rest have given up and despaired, the movement of the Jihad brings us back to our faith."

And so much for tolerance of women's rights:

Al-Qaradawi has also chimed in about inter-gender interaction, domestic order, and Jews. For instance, in his 1984 book, The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam, al-Qaradawi promotes a misogynistic stance on the rights of women:

Because of his natural ability and his responsibility for providing for his family, the man is the head of the house and of the family. He is entitled to the obedience and cooperation of his wife, and accordingly it is not permissible for her to rebel against his authority, causing disruption. Without a captain the ship of the household will flounder and sink.

If this was where al-Qaradawi's views ended, then his views on women, while excessively traditional, would not stand out. However, al-Qaradawi goes on to support domestic violence, female genital mutilation (a.k.a. female circumcision) – a practice deemed to bring about "universally unacceptable harm" by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN).

On his Al-Jazeera program in a discussion regarding spousal abuse, al-Qaradawi said that hitting one's wife is the last resort, and continued, "There is a woman who cannot agree to being beaten, and sees this as humiliation, while some women enjoy the beating and for them, only beating to cause them sorrow is suitable…"

On female circumcision, al-Qaradawi has said that, while not obligatory under the laws of Islam, "whoever finds it serving the interest of his daughters should do it, and I personally support this under the current circumstances in the modern world."

Here are more details on the Muslim American Society.

So if you disagree with those Islamic practices, then you are committing Fitnah and deserve to be called an evil Islamophobe. Those of the interfaith movement, who are seeking tolerance toward members of different faiths, are making a huge mistake. The bridge being built is on a one-way street.

Why Resisting Islam [Fitnah] Is Worse Than Slaughter

In October 2016 Phil Haney, a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security, provided us with more insight into what it really means when an Islamist calls someone an Islamophobe:

Fitnah is the Quranic phrase for what has been dubbed Islamophobia in the non-Islamic world.

The very fact that you are not a Muslim, and don’t want to be, after being called upon [Dawah], makes you unjust and [an] oppressor. This is called Fitnah, and Fitnah is worse than killing. Whenever you criticize Islam on the Net, you are committing Fitnah. Therefore, you are worse than a murderer, and your blood is Halal [Permissible].

A little more than a year ago, I wrote about the subject of Fitnah from an Islamic theological perspective, while pointing out that Fitnah is the Quranic phrase for what has been dubbed Islamophobia in the non-Islamic world.

This time, I would like to discuss the same subject, but from a more secular-political perspective. In other words, does the potent Quranic concept that Fitnah is worse than slaughter, have any application in the secular-political world outside of predominantly Islamic countries?

As you will see, the answer is, plainly, Yes. After reviewing the earlier article on Fitnah, you’ll also see that the bottom line, theologically, is that the serious moral crime of refusing to accept Islam (= Fitnah), is much greater than any possible moral crime involved in the slaughtering (or plundering) of non-Muslims for their unbelief.

Is this counter-intuitive to the non-Islamic (Western) mind? Absolutely. ‘That’s a pretty stark statement,’ you’ll say. Agreed, but it is nonetheless true, as attested by Islamic scholars clear back to the founding of Islam, more than 1,400 years ago. From the very beginning, Mohammed set the example of killing people for the crime of Fitnah, and his example has been followed ever since, often with unfathomable enthusiasm.

And...

Once again, we have to keep in mind that in the secular-political (non-Islamic) world, Islamophobia has become the semantic equivalent of Fitnah. Thus, it follows that any form of Islamophobia (i.e., anything seen as critical of Islam, even if it’s true), is now considered a greater threat to the social order, than the acts of violence (either political or actual) that are committed by the followers of Islam.

Why is this important to understand? Because in real time, macro domestic- and foreign policies are being built on this concept. As the following examples will show, we are being subtly coerced (and/or not-so-subtly forced) to submit to this unconstitutional, emerging global social order, on a near-daily basis.

And...

During the lengthy (and revealing) conversation, which is entitled, The Obama Doctrine, Unplugged, we learned that Obama believes that a “misplaced word, or a frightened look, or an ill-considered hyperbolic claim, could tip the country into panic,” the sort of panic that would “manifest itself in anti-Muslim xenophobia or in a challenge to American openness and to the constitutional order.”

In addition, we were informed that “Those who speak with Obama about jihadist thought say that he possesses a no-illusions understanding of the forces that drive apocalyptic violence among radical Muslims, but he has been careful about articulating that publicly, out of concern that he will exacerbate anti-Muslim xenophobia.”

This, my friends is a perfect summary of the Quranic concept of Fitnah is worse than slaughter. In his own words, our president tells us that he is less concerned about honestly addressing the threat of Jihad and slaughter, than he is about exacerbating any simmering anti-Muslim xenophobia, which is just a secular-political way of describing Fitnah.

Mr. President, some of us are no longer children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men. Some of us are also very aware that there is a growing threat in this world we live in, and that it has a name.

Pretending that it somehow doesn’t exist, or calling by some other name (xenophobia), or blaming us for being concerned, is not what we elected you to do.

Dusty Johnson liberal enough to earn Cory Heidelberger's support in the Republican House primary

Cory Heidelberger's support of Dusty Johnson in the Republican House primary confirms his liberal credentials:

The trick is that we would all have to decide which Republican to back to keep Tapio out. At this point, I lean toward a unified effort to help Dusty win the primary, since Shantel seems more inclined to fight with Tapio for the Trumpist crown, meaning they will split the Nazi base and votes for Dusty will augment a sane mainstream vote, leaving us with a general election battle between the very good Bjorkman and the possibly tolerable Johnson.