Now we learn that the Muslim Brotherhood's infiltration into our government includes the FBI:
The Jan. 10 BRIDGES meeting in Michigan serves as a fresh reminder of how the FBI has made a concerted effort to divert the eyes of law enforcement officers away from Muslim communities as potential breeding grounds for terror and refocus attention on "Islamophobic" American citizens.
The meeting, held at the Troy Police and Fire Training Center in Oakland County, an affluent suburb of Detroit, was described as "painful to watch" by two guests who attended.
Dick Manasseri, an activist with Secure Michigan and a resident of Oakland County, was one of about 80 people present. He and a friend were able to get in by way of a guest invitation from the American Middle Eastern Christian Congress, a regular attendee. But he said there was no emphasis placed on the plight of persecuted Middle Eastern Christians now living in Oakland County.
Instead, almost the entire hour-and-a-half meeting was spent focusing on Islamic religious and cultural practices and trying to debunk any derogatory information police officers may have about Islamic ideology.
The FBI's point person for this task was Bushra Alawie, a young female Muslim wearing a full head covering, or hijab. Alawie served in the Army National Guard and upon leaving the Guard in September 2016 the FBI hired her to be its "community outreach specialist" in Detroit.
"I get that initial look like, ‘is that really Bushra’ because of my visibly Muslim attire," Alawie told Detroit's WXYZ-TV in 2016. “Immediately those rumors are dispelled and it’s business as usual.”
Alawie admitted in the WXYZ interview that her real mission at the FBI is not to ferret out tips and information useful in the apprehension of terrorists but rather it is to "combat Islamophobia."
That just happens to be the same exact mission of the Muslim Brotherhood-offshoot Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which has an entire division called the Department to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia. And while he did not attend on Jan. 10, CAIR's Michigan chapter head, Dawud Walid, has a standing invitation to the FBI's quarterly BRIDGES meetings in metro Detroit.
Here is how we got to this point:
Philip Haney, a former armed Customs and Border Protection officer who became a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003 and a member of the Advanced Targeting Team before retiring in July 2015, said the FBI did not get to rolling out Bushra Alawie as an expert on terrorism overnight. It took years.
When Haney tried to blow the whistle on Homeland Security ineptitude, he found himself investigated repeatedly before being exonerated and honorably discharged.
"She wouldn't have been given that platform under the old rules," Haney said of Alawie. "These concessions to Islam have been developing for a long time."
Haney said the campaign to sanitize Islam began right after 9/11 and was international in scope.
Since at least 2005, "Combatting Islamophobia" on a global basis has been a top priority of the United Nations and the Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Organization of Islamic Cooperation, a 57-nation group of Muslim-majority nations that makes up the largest voting bloc at the U.N.
The OIC adopted its 10-year Strategic Action Plan to Overcome Islamophobia in 2005, calling for nations to pass new laws "including deterrent punishments" for those guilty of Islamophobia. This crime was described as any speech that counters the OIC's statement that "Islam is the religion of moderation and tolerance."
This 10-year plan served as the basis for the 2011 U.N. Human Rights Resolution 16/18, which encourages every nation in the world to pass hate-speech laws making "defamation of religion" a crime. Many nations in Western Europe, including the UK, Germany and Sweden obliged, as did Canada, and passed hate-speech laws geared toward punishing "Islamophobes."
It was also around this same time frame – 2010 to 2012 – that lesson plans in public schools across the United States started incorporating large sections on Islam, emphasizing it as a religion of peace and tolerance.
The first fact we need to understand is that Islamophobia is just another word for the Islamic concept of Fitnah:
For additional clarity and brevity, I have summarized 16 of the most commonly encountered renditions of Fitnah in Table 1 below. In addition, the right-hand column of Table 1 includes a list of non-Islamic activities and/or responses that, from a Muslim perspective, are seen as Fitnah. For example, what those in the non-Islamic world see as a legitimate effort to resist the implementation of Shariah Law is seen as resistance, aggression or even incitement to violence (aka Islamophobia) by multitudes of Muslims who support and promote the world-wide expansion of Islam.
Important point: Anyone opposed to Sharia Law is classified as Fitnah, or what is called Islamophobia, and Muslims are required to implement Jihad against those so-called "Islamophobes", as part of their religious obligations. That is the mission of CAIR.
And it is Taneeza Islam who is bringing CAIR's Jihadi agenda into our state government in order to prevent law enforcement from doing its job:
A South Dakota committee unanimously voted down a resolution that would have required government agencies to cut ties — if any exist — with the country's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy group.
The Senate State Affairs Committee on Wednesday night rejected Senate Concurrent Resolution 7, which would have called for state government and law enforcement officials to suspend and avoid communication with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
Muslim South Dakotans, representatives from other faith groups and the head of the state's fraternal order of police said the resolution was discriminatory while its sponsor said it would help reduce the risk of terrorism.
Sen. Stace Nelson, R-Fulton, said he brought the resolution because he was worried about about CAIR's possible connection to terrorist groups and its role in helping refugees resettle in the United States.
Opponents pointed out that the group doesn't have a presence in South Dakota and hasn't influenced refugee placement in the state. They also spoke to the deeper significance of the resolution for Muslim South Dakotans.
"I can find no other reason but to believe that this resolution is a smokescreen to target Muslims in South Dakota and our access to government and law enforcement agencies," said Taneeza Islam, an immigration attorney from Sioux Falls.
Islam said the legislation sent a powerful negative message to Muslim South Dakotans and seemed like an effort to allow for discrimination. She said the resolution's defeat was a win for South Dakota.
CAIR is Hamas, Taneeza Islam worked for CAIR-MN and has brought their agenda to South Dakota. Senator Nelson's resolution should have been a warning to South Dakota about Taneeza Islam's real agenda. Taneeza celebrates her ability to infiltrate South Dakota's government:
During the last legislative session, an anti-refugee bill was introduced. "Our coalition worked together with Lutheran Social Services," she said. "Lutheran Social Services is the only refugee resettlement entity in our state … and they basically receive refugees to resettle into our state."
LSS, Islam said, was happy with an amendment offered to lessen the anti-refugee effects of the bill which was eventually passed.
"We had two really vitriolic resolutions — SCR 7 and SCR 15," she said. "The first was called the ‘anti-CAIR’ resolution. CAIR (Council for American-Islamic Relations) is a civil rights organization that protects and defends the civil rights and liberties of Muslims in the United States, and in North h America. They are really akin to the ACLU."
No CAIR chapter is organized in South Dakota. "This resolution primarily asked law enforcement and other government agencies not to work with CAIR affiliates," Islam said. "During my testimony, I argued that because there is no CAIR chapter here in South Dakota, if we just inserted the word ‘Muslim’ instead of ‘CAIR’ into the resolution, it was asking law enforcement and government agencies not to work with Muslim communities."
South Dakota Voices for Peace achieved a victory when the chairperson of the Fraternal Order of Police wrote a scathing statement to the legislators who authored this resolution.
"It was very pivotal for our coalition and the momentum that we garnered," said Islam, who, before moving to South Dakota, worked as the first civil rights director of the Minnesota chapter of CAIR.
I was there when Taneeza made that statement and here is my response:
During the USD presentation Taneeza said, "This resolution primarily asked law enforcement and other government agencies not to work with CAIR affiliates. During my testimony, I argued that because there is no CAIR chapter here in South Dakota, if we just inserted the word ‘Muslim’ instead of ‘CAIR’ into the resolution, it was asking law enforcement and government agencies not to work with Muslim communities."
CAIR does not need a chapter in South Dakota, because they have Taneeza Islam to carry water for them. Taneeza worked as a so-called Civil Rights Director for CAIR-MN from 2008 to 2012. The resolution should have been a warning in regard to Taneeza Islam, as she has brought CAIR’s agenda to South Dakota, and should be considered CAIR’s unofficial affiliate. CAIR reported on her April 9th protest of Christian pastor Shahram Hadian on their National Facebook page. Sadly, South Dakota’s media and law enforcement agencies don’t have enough understanding, which is partially caused by the Marxists, Islamists, and inter-faith apostates joining forces to denigrate those exposing the truth by calling them racists, bigots and Islamophobes.
Taneeza Islam is a skilled propagandists and has made fools out of South Dakota's Fraternal Order of police and has successfully changed law enforcement's focus from rooting out potential attacks in South Dakota to combating s0-called Islamophobia, which is the Muslim Brotherhood's code word for Fitnah, and a call for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation of Jihad. Any governmental body, including law enforcement, involved in combating so-called "Islamophobia" is in effect implementing Sharia Law. And since Islam is considered a religion, our government is establishing that religion and violating the First Amendment when they chose to combat so-called Islamophobia. This fulfills the Muslim Brotherhood's stated purpose of infiltrating America in order to destroy us from within.
So you are saying that just pointing out the ACTUAL FACTS of what the CAIR, ISNA, the Interfaith Groups, et. al. are doing, it's Fitnah & they can harm or kill you?
Would that be true of just quoting the Quran, Sunnah & Hadith?
Posted by: JimHoliway | February 03, 2018 at 12:55 PM
Just quoting is not enough. The context has to be critical of Islam.
Posted by: Steve Sibson | February 05, 2018 at 06:15 AM