Sibby Online

Communists ruin parade

The Argus Leader is reporting that the same group that I have found to be linked to Communist front groups, upset those in attendance at yesterday’s St. Patrick’s Day parade in Sioux Falls:

There was some cautious applause, but mostly silence as the South Dakota Peace and Justice Center's marchers approached, holding signs that read "Mission Demolished: Iraq is a Wreck" and "Bring Them Home." They were followed by a man holding a "Veterans for Peace" sign and a '60s-motif van painted with anti-war slogans.

"That's totally inappropriate for a parade like this," said Marian Gustafson of Sioux Falls. "My girlfriend who was with me has a husband and son in Iraq and was crying from that point on."

Since Patrick Lalley does read this web site, I wonder if his open government philosophy will also include exposing the communist ties this group?

Anti-American, anti-Christian, and communism

First lets start with the anti-American statement John Kerry made this weekend via Rush Limbaugh:

RUSH: [John Kerry] He got in on the action over the weekend, too, does it again, another botched joke, calling America an international pariah while he was at the World Economic Forum in Davos. (video) He was on a panel with the former president of the terror state of Iran, Mohammed Khatami, and this is what he said.

KERRY: Americans have an unfortunate habit of seeing the world and other people exclusively through an American lens --

RUSH: What?

KERRY: -- and judging their aspirations --

RUSH: What?

KERRY: -- through that lens.

RUSH: What?

KERRY: We have a crisis of confidence in the Middle East, in the world, really. I've never seen our country as isolated as much of a set of international pariah for a number of reasons as it is today. … We should be less engaged in this neocon rhetoric of regime change and more involved in building relationships and living up to our own values so that people make a different judgment about us.

RUSH: You know, there is so much psychologically wrong with this -- well, factually wrong and psychologically dangerous, and very troubling. "We should be less engaged in neocon rhetoric of regime change and more along the lines of building relationships?" You know, the main argument that people have on my side of the aisle with what we're doing in Iraq is we're spending too much time building relationships, we're spending too much time building up a relationship rather than kicking the butt of the enemy, which is what the American people want. "Living up to our own values? Seeing everything through an American lens?" Living up to our own values, he would have to support what Bush is doing. Our own values are freedom, republican democracy and this sort of thing, which is what we are trying to put together in Iraq, and then the killer is so that people make a different judgment about us. This is a guy who lives in fear of what people think of him and is willing to be whatever he has to to get that approval.

I'm going to tell you something, it's not just his policy matters that are causing him to say these things. He's not alone, by the way. This is a liberal tradition to go across the oceans on foreign soil, call your country the worst place on the planet. Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Jimmy Carter again, Jimmy Carter again, now John Kerry has done it again. It's a liberal tradition, go overseas and trash the country. And, of course, Kerry said, "Well, I'm not trashing the country. I'm trashing leaders of the country. You misunderstand Limbaugh because you're just stupid." Right. Well, Kerry's got this hang-up, folks, the American people rejected him, and he just can't deal with it. You didn't realize what a gift you had in John Kerry. You didn't realize what a brilliant elitist, smartest guy we could have had in the White House ever. You rejected him, and if you reject John Kerry, the only difference between you and a bag of dog doo-doo is the bag. He's got a chip on his shoulder about having lost the election and being rejected by the American people, and so America is a pariah.

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Background Material...

(New York Times: Hillary Clinton’s Mission Unaccomplished)
(YouTube Video: Hillary on the War in Iraq & Weapons of Mass Destruction)
(Hunter criticizes Kerry remarks on US being "isolated")
(Iran: Meeting between Khatami, Kerry 'ordinary')
(John Kerry Slams His Own Country At Davos)
(PowerLine: Nice Going, John)
(Fars News Agency: Kerry Backs Up Iran's Nuclear Rights)

Lets not forget that Kerry’s anti-American crusade goes back to Vietnam. And so does Jane Fonda whose anti-American crusade was resurrected this week-end:

Convinced this is their moment, tens of thousands marched Saturday in an anti-war demonstration linking military families, ordinary people and an icon of the Vietnam protest movement in a spirited call to get out of Iraq.

Celebrities, a half-dozen lawmakers and protesters from distant states rallied in the capital under a sunny sky, seizing an opportunity to press their cause with a Congress restive on the war and a country that has turned against the conflict.

Marching with them was Jane Fonda, in what she said was her first anti-war demonstration in 34 years.

"Silence is no longer an option," Fonda said to cheers from the stage on the National Mall. The actress once derided as "Hanoi Jane" by conservatives for her stance on Vietnam said she had held back from activism so as not to be a distraction for the Iraq anti-war movement, but needed to speak out now.

The rally on the Mall unfolded peacefully, although about 300 protesters tried to rush the Capitol, running up the grassy lawn to the front of the building. Police on motorcycles tried to stop them, scuffling with some and barricading entrances.

Protesters chanted "Our Congress" as their numbers grew and police faced off against them. Demonstrators later joined the masses marching from the Mall, around Capitol Hill and back.

About 50 demonstrators blocked a street near the Capitol for about 30 minutes, but they were dispersed without arrests.

United for Peace and Justice, a coalition group sponsoring the protest, had hoped 100,000 would come. They claimed even more afterward, but police, who no longer give official estimates, said privately the crowd was smaller than 100,000.

Note the organizer was United for Peace and Justice (they sound a lot like South Dakota Peace and Justice Center). Under my Public Education links is a column by Linda Kimball that starts with this reference to United for Peace and Justice:

There are two misconceptions held by many Americans. The first is that communism ceased to be a threat when the Soviet Union imploded. The second is that the New Left of the Sixties collapsed and disappeared as well. "The Sixties are dead," wrote columnist George Will (Slamming the Doors, Newsweek, Mar. 25, 1991)

Because the New Left lacked cohesion it fell apart as a political movement. However, its revolutionaries reorganized themselves into a multitude of single issue groups. Thus we now have for example, radical feminists, black extremists, anti-war ‘peace’ activists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, and ‘gay’ rights groups. All of these groups pursue their piece of the radical agenda through a complex network of subversive organizations such as the Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), People for the American Way, United for Peace and Justice, Planned Parenthood, Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Code Pink for Peace.

Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America. Code words by which they can be recognized are: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity. All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.

And now for the anti-Christian part:

By the end of WWI, socialists realized that something was amiss, for the world’s proletariat had not heeded Marx’s call to rise up in opposition to evil capitalism and to embrace communism instead. They wondered what had gone wrong.

Separately, two Marxist theorists—Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary—concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order. The West would have to be conquered first.

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class. The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a "long march through the culture." Additionally, a new proletariat must be created. In his "Prison Notebooks," he suggested that the new proletariat be comprised of many criminals, women, and racial minorities.

The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history. All of these things must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.

And WorldNetDaily has the details on the latest anti-Christian attack:

To New York Times TV critic Alessandra Stanley, the Christian South is ''the Loire Valley of American extremism.'' Not to be outdone, Washington Post critic Tom Shales calls the Bible Belt ''scary as hell.''

The two critics unveiled their warped view of evangelical Christianity in reviews of Alexandra Pelosi's new HBO documentary, ''Friends of God,'' which premiered Jan. 25.

Shales and Stanley appeared to be competing to see who could use the most demeaning, stereotypical rhetoric to dismiss evangelical Christians.

By contrast, Alexandra Pelosi, daughter of the new speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, came away from her 18-month exploration of evangelical culture with a vow to take her newborn son to church. Apparently she didn't find these folks so horrifying.

Here are excerpts from the reviews. From The New York Times' Alessandra Stanley:

''The Bible belt is the Loire Valley of American extremism – visitors glide across vast highways in the South and West to marvel at the revivalist megachurches and ''Honk for Jesus'' road signs with the giddy awe of tourists exploring an alien civilization…The documentary is a good-natured travelogue: it glances on the more intolerant and grotesque manifestations of Christian fundamentalism and also the faith's vast following and political clout. Ms. Pelosi's film doesn't go deep; it doesn't even explore why so many televangelists seem to follow the trajectory of Elmer Gantry. But it doesn't snicker. ...''

Note to Stanley: You might want to apply over at National Geographic, where ''exploring an alien civilization'' is what they've been doing expertly for decades.

From The Washington Post's Tom Shales:

''…the Christians we see in this film are unyielding in the rightness of their ideas (i.e., evolution and abortion are wrong, ‘Jesus is the only way' and America is a Christian nation), and if someone challenges them, they simply say God has told them the truth. Certitude is the common bond…much of what the evangelicals say has to do with loving thy neighbor and finding 'eternal life.' But there is also an unmistakable combative tone that grows more aggressive as Pelosi's travels continue…Teenage Christian zealots attend a ''training camp'' for ''young warriors.'' A man identified as a Christian comic shouts from the stage, 'We want our country back, and we'll fight for it' and a solicitation letter from Jerry Falwell is headlined in large italic type, 'Will you join me in a declaration of war?' They call it a culture war, Christians vs. 'the secular progressive movement'…Christians vs. abortion rights advocates, and Christians vs. science…everywhere, beneath the widely smiling faces and facade of love in this film, there's a lurking hyper-nationalism that tries to link evangelicals with the U.S. flag and the Founding Fathers, and a seemingly paranoid hostility that maintains Christians are the most persecuted group in America…''Friends of God'' is powerful filmmaking in a uniquely understated way, a tour through another America that is sometimes funny, sometimes touching, and sometimes scary as hell.''

Note to Shales: With reviews like this, you think evangelicals are paranoid for no good reason? And by the way, when Christians talk about kids becoming ''warriors,'' they're typically talking about ''prayer warriors,'' the folks who spend hours praying for people who smear and ridicule them.

Pelosi herself has another take. While making the rounds of the talk shows to promote the film, she repeatedly made the point that she was changed by the experience.

''…something that I took away from this was that it's important to expose your children to religion,'' she told Good Morning America's Diane Sawyer. ''Whatever is important to you, because otherwise, they will be called unchurched. And those are the ones that later in life may fall into some of the more extreme religions.'' You mean like…no, never mind.

One wonders if either critic has traveled outside the confines of greater New York and Washington, D.C. to see for themselves the people they think of as ''aliens.'' They might just find normal, everyday folks who happen to love Jesus.

Using their TV columns to castigate people they don't understand verges on journalistic malpractice, not to mention outright bigotry.

I know I just covered a lot of ground, John Kerry, Jane Fonda, Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, and this list of far-left Cultural Marxists:

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

People for the American Way

United for Peace and Justice,

Planned Parenthood

Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS)

Code Pink for Peace

With the abortion ban coming up in Pierre, and the crusade to expand public education by increasing funding so that pre-K programs can be started, I must also expand on the Planned Parenthood and SIECUS contribution to the anti-American crusade. Claire Chambers said this in Chapter 4 of her book titled, "The SIECUS Circle, A Humanist Revolution":

After close scrutiny of the atheistic philosophy and Socialistic-orientated objectives of Humanism, along with concepts proclaimed in both Humanist Manifestos, only one logical conclusion can be drawn: that it is the intent of the Humanist hierarchy to meld all people of the world into an apostate religion under the control of a one-world Socialist government – a goal also envisioned by the Communists in their determined drive for the obliteration of Western Christian civilization. Perhaps that is why so many leading Humanists are also found in the ranks of the Communist "fifth column."

The partners in this unholy alliance, all of whom seek the same ultimate goal, must first secularize all institutions and corrupt America’s youth if they are to triumph. The schools were long ago chosen as the site for the major battle. Sex education is just one of the many deadly weapons in the armory of the Communist-Humanist complex.

Chambers points out the smear tactics that the media allow the left to use against those of us who bring the truth:

By ignoring the specifics – names, dates, and subversive affiliations of persons involved in the upper echelons of sex education – the media avoid bringing the real facts of the issue before the public. Instead, charges of subversion are either dismissed as "totally unfounded" with no reason given, or the smear tactics of ridicule and scorn are employed. And so the public is lulled back to sleep with the tranquilizer of evasive jargon.

And Chad Schuldt, is the far-left’s leader in smear tactics within the South Dakota blogosphere. He is often found attacking Leslee Unruh, Roger Hunt, Bob Ellis, and myself. And at times he mocks Christianity in the process. You will find Schuldt on the Hildebrand Tewes team. His bio includes this:

Chad managed the Voter File and helped identify targeted voters for the campaign that overturned the South Dakota abortion ban.

Schuldt’s smear tactics are rewarded with blood money of hundreds of babies who continue to die in the Sioux Falls Planned Parenthood abortion mill. Unfortunately that is what happens to those who have intoxicated themselves with the far-left's Humanist indoctrination found in today’s public education system.

To be clear, I am not saying Chad Schuldt is a communist, he may be just one of their useful idiots.

The anti-American Stalinists

From Rush Limbaugh:

CALLER: -- that Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe sent to the chairman of ExxonMobil. I mean I've never seen anything so practically blackmail and off the wall to imply that global warming now caused by humans is a fact and that for anybody to deny it and certainly for ExxonMobil to maybe fund some research to counter it is hurting America's position in the world, and they're going to be treated like Big Tobacco if they don't stop it.

RUSH: Well, I'm surprised that you think you've never seen this kind of what you'd call practically blackmail. This is who they are. How do you think Wal-Mart feels? How do you think Big Tobacco felt? How do you think Big Pharmaceutical feels, Big Trans-Fat, Big Sugar? You take a look at the enemies list of the American left, and it is the engine that drives the country economically, all the way up from the small businessman to big corporations. They are Stalinists. They're being totally in character. This is real liberalism, Bill. This is intimidation. This is who these people are. They've got their power now, and they're going to intimidate.

…

Jay Rockefeller's fortune comes from Big Oil. Jay Rockefeller wouldn't have a dime other than his Senate salary and he might not even have that, if his last name weren't Rockefeller. He wouldn't have a dime were it not for the fact that it was his grandfather, great-grandfather, whoever, John D. Rockefeller who started Big Oil in the first place. The old Standard Oil Company was broken up in the anti-trust movement of the last century. Why didn't Jay Rockefeller put his inheritance where his mouth is and donate all the money that he has inherited to these remedial efforts on global warming? I can't think of an individual in a position of power in this country who has personally benefited more from Big Oil than Jay Rockefeller.

So look at the enemies list: Exxon, Wal-Mart, Halliburton. The Democrats are socialists who seek to destroy our industries and economic system and kill jobs. "Come on, Rush! You're headed over the cliff again." No. These people want the government to be the answer to everything, folks. They want you to have to go to government to get a job; they want you to have to go to the government to get relief on prices. They want government to be where you look with praise and respect and honor. They don't want to you thanking the company for which you work, they want you hating it. They want you to think you're being screwed by the people you work for. They want you to love them.

The dirty little secret here is the left in this country is at war with blue-collar Americans, and blue-collar Americans don't even know it. You look at oil, coal, automobiles, construction, who do they think works for these enterprises they're trying to destroy? You look at Wal-Mart, who do they think the customers of Wal-Mart are? And they're trying to destroy that. There is a war. I don't think it's just because of blue-collar Americans. I think the left in this country is at war with this country. They are doing everything they can to dismantle all of the economic growth and prosperity that Ronald Reagan started in the 1980s. Look, their whole approach to illegal immigration has the effect of driving down wages, especially for minorities. They cover that up by supposedly standing for an increase in the minimum wage, but that's just a sop to the unions. Why do you think they want illegal immigrants in this country? They don't have to pay them diddly-squat, ladies and gentlemen, and that drives down wages for everybody.

Democrats tied to communists

From Joseph Farah:

You've all heard the expression "limousine liberal."

We have lots of them in the U.S. Congress, Hollywood, the corporate boardrooms.

But I want you to know that the woman vying tomorrow to be the next speaker of the House is no "limousine liberal."

The phrase doesn't begin to do justice to the hypocrisy of Nancy Pelosi.

That's why I've dubbed her a "caviar commie."

It's more accurate, and I'll prove it.

First of all, if Democrats win the House tomorrow, Pelosi won't only be the first woman speaker, she will also be the wealthiest.

How much is this unassuming "grandma" worth? The Center for Responsive Politics puts her in the $55 million neighborhood. Pretty nice neighborhood, huh?

Despite her protestations about those "tax cuts for the rich," she has never mentioned returning them to the federal Treasury where they rightfully belong. Go figure.

As I have reported previously in this space, Pelosi, the winner of the 2003 Cesar Chavez award from the United Farm Workers, hires only non-union workers on her $25 million Napa Valley vineyard.

Maybe this explains her firm opposition to any efforts to enhance border security and the flow of illegal cheap labor into the country from Mexico, speculates Investor's Business Daily.

According to Peter Schweizer's account in "Do As I Say (Not As I Do)," the luxury resort and restaurants she partly owns are also strictly non-union. The exclusive country club she partly owns failed to comply with existing environmental regulations for the past eight years – including a failure to protect endangered species.

Those rules are for mere mortals, not the caviar Comintern.

Maybe you're saying, "Farah, I can see why Pelosi would be called a 'limousine liberal' based on what you report, but why do you take it so far as to call her a 'caviar commie'"?

Good question. And here's the rest of the story.

As only WND has reported, Pelosi is a long-time member of the "Progressive Caucus" – or, as I call it, the Congressional Red Army Caucus.

In fact, she has even served on the executive committee of the socialist-leaning Progressive Caucus, a bloc of about 60 votes or nearly 30 percent of the minority vote in the lower chamber. Until 1999, the website of the Progressive Caucus was hosted by the Democratic Socialists of America. Following an expose of the link between the two organizations in WND, the Progressive Caucus established its own website under the auspices of Congress. Another officer of the Progressive Caucus, and one of its guiding lights, is avowed socialist Rep. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent.

The Democratic Socialists of America's chief organizing stated goal is to work within the Democratic Party and remove the stigma attached to "socialism" in the eyes of most Americans.

"Stress our Democratic Party strategy and electoral work," explains an organizing document of the DSA. "The Democratic Party is something the public understands, and association with it takes the edge off. Stressing our Democratic Party work will establish some distance from the radical subculture and help integrate you to the milieu of the young liberals."

Nevertheless, the goal of the Democratic Socialists of America has never been deeply hidden. Prior to the cleanup of its website in 1999, the DSA included a song list featuring "The Internationale," the worldwide anthem of communism and socialism. Another song on the site was "Red Revolution" sung to the tune of "Red Robin." The lyrics went: "When the Red Revolution brings its solution along, along, there'll be no more lootin' when we start shootin' that Wall Street throng. ..." Another song removed after WorldNetDaily's expose was "Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie?" The lyrics went: "Are you sleeping? Are you sleeping? Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie. And when the revolution comes, We'll kill you all with knives and guns, Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie."

In the last six years, the Progressive Caucus has been careful to moderate its image for mainstream consumption.

Now, do I exaggerate when I characterize Nancy Pelosi, not as a "limousine liberal," but as a "caviar commie"?

I think not. But tomorrow is Election Day. You decide for yourself. Cast your vote wisely.

Jack Billion, a communist?

David Kranz does his typical Drive-By today. This time it is Republican Governor Rounds decision to stay the execution of Elijah Page. Here is a quote from Jack Billion:

But Billion also questions Rounds: "Now this governor is passing the responsibility on to the 2007 Legislature. Sadly, that is not leadership."

So now we know the kind of leader Jack Billion wants to be…a tyrant. Instead of a representative republic, Billion wants to turn South Dakota into a communist state run by the Governor. But what should we expect from one who promotes a socialist agenda.

The anti-anti-communists

From Walter E. Williams (read the whole thing):

Grove City College publishes an excellent newsletter titled "Visions and Values." Its July 2006 edition features an interview with Richard Pipes, acclaimed Russian historian and Harvard University professor of Sovietology. The interview was conducted by Grove City College professor of political science Paul Kengor, Ph.D.

Dr. Pipes, who served on the National Security Council during the Reagan administration, explained that there are actually only a few communists among academics. At first glance, that's a puzzling observation, given the leftist bias at most college campuses. Pipes and Kengor explain the puzzle in a way that makes perfect sense.

While academic leftists, and I'd include their media allies, are not communists, they are anti-anti-communists. In other words, they have contempt for right-wingers, conservatives or libertarians who are anti-communists. Why? Academic leftists, and their media allies, are in agreement with many of the stated goals of communism, such as equal distribution of wealth, income equality and other goals spelled out in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' "Manifesto of the Communist Party." Leftist elites love the ideas of communism so much that they are either blind to, or tolerant of, its many shortcomings.

…

At home and abroad, leftists have done a thorough and commendable job documenting and condemning the horrors and crimes of Hitler and his fascist Nazi regime, but when have you heard them direct similar condemnation of Joseph Stalin, his successors and Mao Tse-tung? By and large, they've chosen to overlook the horrors of communism.

The reason for their reluctance to condemn the barbarism of communism is simple. Dr. Pipes says, "Intellectuals, by the very nature of their professions, grant enormous attention to words and ideas. And they are attracted by socialist ideas. They find that the ideas of communism are praiseworthy and attractive; that, to them, is more important than the practice of communism. Now Nazi ideals, on the other hand, were pure barbarism; nothing could be said in favor of them."

Often, when people evaluate capitalism, they evaluate a system that exists on Earth. When they evaluate communism, they are talking about a non-existent Utopia. What exists on Earth, with all of its problems and shortcomings, is always going to fail miserably when compared to a Utopia. The very attempt to achieve the utopian goals of communism requires the ruthless suppression of the individual and an attack on any institution that might compromise the loyalty of the individual to the state. That's why one of the first orders of business for communism, and those who support its ideas, is the attack on religion and the family.

The insane left

From Bert Prelutsky:

Another thing about liberals I can't begin to figure out is their abiding devotion to failed economic theories. The fact that communism hasn't worked anywhere in the world doesn't cool their ardor in the slightest. The fact that Marx's brainstorm invariably metastasizes into a despotic tyranny – be it in the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, Cambodia or Venezuela – doesn't make the slightest impression on them. Neither does the fact that socialism has brought much of Europe to the brink of moral and financial bankruptcy faze them in the least.

In our own country, the most obvious failure of socialism is Social Security, the single largest pyramid scheme ever conceived by the mind of man. When Ponzi did it, he went to jail for fraud; when Roosevelt pulled it off, he was hailed as a savior. As someone or other once observed, if you're going to steal, steal big.

So why is it that leftists continue to promote these half-cocked alternatives to capitalism, the only economic program that's ever motivated people to aspire, to compete, to achieve and to innovate?

Well, I hate to be impolite, but when people keep doing the same thing in spite of getting the same rotten results, we have been told by experts in the field that it's a pretty sure sign of insanity.

No Hollywood in communist countries

From Doug Powers:

The problem, as far as Democrat politicians are concerned, is what to do with the politically active Belafonte going into an election season. How can they not have their picture taken with Harry, while still getting close enough to accept a campaign donation?

Hillary Clinton was trying to figure that out last week.

Harry Belafonte yanked his nose out of Hugo Chavez's behind long enough to go to a fund-raiser in New York City for the "Children's Defense Fund." The event was also attended by Hillary Clinton. It was later reported that Hillary, sensing potential disaster for a presidential run, employed the "just like I do with my husband" strategy – never allowing herself get within 15 feet of Belafonte.

Hillary made sure that her relationship with Harry Belafonte would remain a political Yeti: Rumored to exist, but accompanied by little or no credible photographic evidence.

Harry Belafonte is a member of an elite club of vacuous entertainers, which includes Danny Glover and many others, who think that Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, and other dictators, totalitarian fist-wavers, and tin-pot pinheads represent what is the ultimate in governmental nirvana.

You'll also notice that proponents of these systems of government also have one thing in common: They're never dumb enough to actually live in a place where it's practiced.

Leftist singers, actors, and others, would rather stay in the United States, home of the "greatest terrorist in the world," than get out from under all this violent oppression. Why?

American entertainment industry leftists stay here because good gigs are much harder to come by in socialist or communist countries. They can complain about the horrible United States from a podium in the Foo-Foo Room at the Beverly Hills Hotel, while making millions acting and directing. Or, the Hollywood left could bash the United States from a country dumb enough to practice what they preach, while getting paid two goats a month for headlining at the Lean-To Motel.

Anti-military intolerance

From WorldNetDaily:

When Rebecca Beach, a freshman at Warren Community College in New Jersey e-mailed faculty announcing a campus program yesterday featuring decorated Iraq war hero Lt. Col. Scott Rutter, the response she got from one English professor took her aback.

English professor John Daly replied: "Real freedom will come when soldiers in Iraq turn their guns on their superiors."

Daly added that he would ask his students to boycott the event and also vowed "to expose [her] right-wing, anti-people politics until groups like [Rebecca’s] won’t dare show their face on a college campus."

Besides organizing the event, Beach's offense was hanging up fliers contrasting the number of people killed under communism to those liberated under the late President Ronald Reagan, according to Young America's Foundation, which came to Beach's aid.

In response to the written tirade, Beach is demanding that Warren Community College President William Austin institute seminars on free speech and sensitivity to teach intolerant faculty members to be respectful of differing opinion.

Now I rest my case on my position that the far-left anti-war Democrats are communists:

Daly's e-mail also claimed that "capitalism has killed many more" people than communism and that "poor and working class people" are recruited to "fight and die for EXXON and other corporations."

"John Daly was hired to teach English, not to verbally attack students and lead leftist protests," said Jason Mattera, spokesman for Young America’s Foundation.

These are the people that are calling the Commander of Chief a liar in a middle of a war. Again…it is the Democrats who are dividing America.

And now we have those speaking out against the New York Times for promoting the Stalin communists:

A Ukrainian-American group plans a demonstration in front of the New York Times building today to demand the paper give up the "blood-stained" 1932 Pulitzer Prize to reporter Walter Duranty, who is accused of ignoring Soviet leader Josef Stalin's forced famine.

Volodymyr Kurylo, president of the United Ukrainian American Organizations of Greater New York, told FrontPage Magazine Times Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. should relinquish the prize because it's "the moral thing to do."

As WorldNetDaily reported in 2003, the Pulitzer Prize board concluded in an investigation of the award prompted by Ukrainian groups that "there was not clear and convincing evidence of deliberate deception" on Duranty's part.

Duranty's writing about Stalin and the Soviet Union has received widespread condemnation for covering up the Ukrainian famine of 1932-33, which killed as many as 7 million people, and other Soviet atrocities. His Pulitzer actually was awarded for writing he did in 1931. He covered the Soviet Union for the Times from 1922 to 1941.

There should be little doubt about what ideology that creates poverty and famines. It is Marxism, not capitalism.

They are communists not liberals

From Devvy Kidd:

Bernie Sanders is an open socialist. This "independent" representative for the state of Vermont who serves in the U.S. House of Representatives is also is a member of the "Progressive Caucus" along with dozens of members of Congress. This is just another communist front-group passing itself off as a "choice for the people." What rubbish.

There's no question Hillary Clinton is a Marxist if you understand the subject matter. In the past, both Bill and Hillary have been generous donors to the Institute for Policy Studies, a subversive organization vigorously investigated by the FBI.

The government's indoctrination centers – called public schools – have done a magnificent job of dumbing down America's children for the past 40 years. So few adults today have any concept or understanding of a constitutional republic – most believe our legal form of government is a democracy. The "great programmer" – also known as television – has done more to shape the minds of Americans than any classroom. Sadly, the result is a nation of people who, for the most part, can't recognize socialism or communism because it has been slowly spoon fed to them all their lives.

I have written before about the 45 communist goals entered into the Congressional Record. If you read the ones listed in my previous column, you will see that these communist goals are ardently embraced by both Sanders and Clinton.