(Editor's note: Frequent visitors need to check updates at the bottom of this post)
Sorry…but Tim Johnson did not apologize…he continued to attack Republicans specifically John Thune. Let me explain.
First, Greg Belfrage is in agreement, as far as the lack of sincerity goes, and has found this quote of Tim Johnson’s from 2002:
”Congressman Thune spends a lot of time talking about values. But his use of Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaida terrorists in campaign ads sadly smacks of desperation and reveals, more and more, that what he really values most is winning elections - no matter what the cost.
Here is Johnson’s explanation from today’s David Kranz Argus Leader report:
"This was a flip remark at an informal gathering," Johnson said. "I should have been more precise about who attacked me without causing the confusion. In this case it was the Republican Senate Campaign Committee and their operative who came into South Dakota and ran the same ads against me that they did against Max Cleland."
Now it looks like Johnson is saying he was referring to DC Republicans instead of South Dakota Republican John Thune. But wait…Kranz continues:
Johnson staff members were not able to identify the specific ad to which he was referring.
An ad late in his 2002 Senate campaign against then-Rep. John Thune ran on most state television stations. It included a picture of Johnson and Saddam Hussein.
Ryan Nelson, who was associated with the Thune campaign in the 2002 and is again in 2004, disputed Johnson's contention.
"In no way did we compare Tim Johnson to Saddam Hussein. We questioned his judgment in voting against missile defense systems 29 times," he said.
The ad showed a picture of Saddam and criticized Johnson for votes in Congress against missile defense.
Now Kranz is trying to pin the blame back on John Thune…who just happens to be running against his college buddy Tom Daschle. Note he used someone from the Thune campaign to explain that Johnson’s accusations are false, instead of finding an expert to give that point more credibility (as he often does for Democrats). Kranz also provides Johnson (in his time of regret) an apportunity to attack Larry Diedrich:
"What you are seeing is the last week of politics going on. You've got a candidate out there trying to find some kind of hook," Johnson said, referring to Diedrich.
Johnson made an even sharper attacker against Diedrich and his supporters via a
KELOLAND link from
Greg Belfrage:
And even though protestors want an apology from both Johnson and Stephanie Herseth, Johnson says his remarks aren't part of this year's campaign and shouldn't reflect on Herseth's character. Johnson says, "I think the people who will try and smear her because of this should be ashamed of themselves.”
Remember my sword and shield
analysis on the Democrats strategy regarding negative campaigns. Johnson clearly used the sword Sunday, now he his using the shield by blaming John Thune for something that happened in 2002 (which is a false accusation)...
except now he sometimes refer to National Republicans. Has the spinning confused you yet?
It is now relevant for Tom Daschle to explain his position on this. His opponent is being blamed in Johnson's so-called apology. He too is using the “negative campaigning” card against John Thune. He has also blamed John Thune for ads run by people who he claims support Thune. Now one of Herseth’s supporters clearly used a negative comment during a campaign rally in which Daschle also participated in. The hypocrsiy here smells so bad that it makes me sick. It is up to the media to get to the bottom of this sword and shield hypocrsiy of the Democrats and expose it to the general public. It is free speech and democracy that is at stake. We need an open and honest discussion on this negative campaigning wildcard that the Democrats use. Gee...I am starting to sound like Randell Beck.
UPDATE: Jon Lauck also has analysis on the so-called apology.
Jason Van Beek also has analysis on Herseth's campaign. I believe his analysis supports my premise above.
I also got the phone message that negatively attacked Larry Diedrich. It had no disclaimer.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Hold the presses! The Argus Leader editorial board says Johnson's apology not good enough. WOW! I did say I was starting to sound like Randell Beck...didn't I. (You can't see my tongue in my cheek, because I am hiding behind my computer screen.)
UPDATE Three: Here is analysis describing apology as tepid. DVT seems to be saying maybe more or less tepid regarding Daschle's response.
Recent Comments